Literature DB >> 36266519

Reply to Kuitunen I (2022). More robust methods are warranted.

Jesper M Kivelä1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID： 36266519     DOI： 10.1007/s00431-022-04667-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN： 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.860


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.

Authors:  Dean Langan; Julian P T Higgins; Dan Jackson; Jack Bowden; Areti Angeliki Veroniki; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; Mark Simmonds
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 5.273

2.  Random-effects meta-analysis of inconsistent effects: a time for change.

Authors:  John E Cornell; Cynthia D Mulrow; Russell Localio; Catharine B Stack; Anne R Meibohm; Eliseo Guallar; Steven N Goodman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Reply to Kivelä JM (2022) "Do methods in meta-analyses matter?"

Authors:  Ilari Kuitunen
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2022-11       Impact factor: 3.860

4.  Do methods in meta-analyses matter?

Authors:  Jesper M Kivelä
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.860

5.  The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method.

Authors:  Joanna IntHout; John P A Ioannidis; George F Borm
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.615
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.