| Literature DB >> 36266452 |
Nicholas A Coles1, David S March2, Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos3, Jeff T Larsen4, Nwadiogo C Arinze5, Izuchukwu L G Ndukaihe5, Megan L Willis6, Francesco Foroni6, Niv Reggev7,8, Aviv Mokady7, Patrick S Forscher9, John F Hunter10, Gwenaël Kaminski11, Elif Yüvrük12, Aycan Kapucu12, Tamás Nagy13, Nandor Hajdu13, Julian Tejada14, Raquel M K Freitag15, Danilo Zambrano16, Bidisha Som17, Balazs Aczel13, Krystian Barzykowski18, Sylwia Adamus18, Katarzyna Filip18, Yuki Yamada19, Ayumi Ikeda20, Daniel L Eaves21,22, Carmel A Levitan23, Sydney Leiweke23, Michal Parzuchowski24, Natalie Butcher25, Gerit Pfuhl26, Dana M Basnight-Brown27, José A Hinojosa28,29, Pedro R Montoro30, Lady G Javela D31, Kevin Vezirian32, Hans IJzerman32,33, Natalia Trujillo34, Sarah D Pressman35, Pascal M Gygax36, Asil A Özdoğru37, Susana Ruiz-Fernandez38,39, Phoebe C Ellsworth40, Lowell Gaertner4, Fritz Strack41, Marco Marozzi42, Marco Tullio Liuzza43.
Abstract
Following theories of emotional embodiment, the facial feedback hypothesis suggests that individuals' subjective experiences of emotion are influenced by their facial expressions. However, evidence for this hypothesis has been mixed. We thus formed a global adversarial collaboration and carried out a preregistered, multicentre study designed to specify and test the conditions that should most reliably produce facial feedback effects. Data from n = 3,878 participants spanning 19 countries indicated that a facial mimicry and voluntary facial action task could both amplify and initiate feelings of happiness. However, evidence of facial feedback effects was less conclusive when facial feedback was manipulated unobtrusively via a pen-in-mouth task.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID： 36266452 DOI： 10.1038/s41562-022-01458-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Hum Behav ISSN： 2397-3374