| Literature DB >> 36266430 |
Shinya Hayashi1, Tsukasa Matsubara2, Toshihisa Maeda3, Koji Fukuda2, Keiko Funahashi2, Marowa Hashimoto4, Ken Tsumiyama2, Tomoyuki Kamenaga3, Yoshinori Takashima3, Tomoyuki Matsumoto3, Shotaro Tachibana3, Ryosuke Kuroda3.
Abstract
We compared the efficacy of tocilizumab and etanercept in inhibiting radiographic progression of joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Overall, 187 patients treated with etanercept or tocilizumab were selected. To adjust for baseline patient characteristics between the tocilizumab and etanercept treatment groups, a propensity score matching was performed. Radiographic progression of joint destruction was compared between patients treated with tocilizumab or etanercept. Clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and modified health assessment questionnaire (mHAQ) scores at the administration of biologic treatment and after 12 months of tocilizumab and etanercept therapy were measured and compared to radiographical parameters between the groups. Levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), CDAI, and mHAQ scores improved after 12 months of treatment in the two groups. Proportion of patients with no Sharp erosion score progression was significantly higher with tocilizumab treatment than with etanercept treatment (p = 0.032). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Sharp erosion score was significantly associated with baseline CDAI (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.003-1.099, p = 0.037). Tocilizumab treatment suppressed joint erosion progression compared to etanercept, and the progression correlated with baseline CDAI.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36266430 PMCID: PMC9585052 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22152-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996