Literature DB >> 36266407

Determinable and interpretable network representation for link prediction.

Yue Deng1.   

Abstract

As an intuitive description of complex physical, social, or brain systems, complex networks have fascinated scientists for decades. Recently, to abstract a network's topological and dynamical attributes, network representation has been a prevalent technique, which can map a network or substructures (like nodes) into a low-dimensional vector space. Since its mainstream methods are mostly based on machine learning, a black box of an input-output data fitting mechanism, the learned vector's dimension is indeterminable and the elements are not interpreted. Although massive efforts to cope with this issue have included, say, automated machine learning by computer scientists and learning theory by mathematicians, the root causes still remain unresolved. Consequently, enterprises need to spend enormous computing resources to work out a set of model hyperparameters that can bring good performance, and business personnel still finds difficulties in explaining the learned vector's practical meaning. Given that, from a physical perspective, this article proposes two determinable and interpretable node representation methods. To evaluate their effectiveness and generalization, this article proposes Adaptive and Interpretable ProbS (AIProbS), a network-based model that can utilize node representations for link prediction. Experimental results showed that the AIProbS can reach state-of-the-art precision beyond baseline models on some small data whose distribution of training and test sets is usually not unified enough for machine learning methods to perform well. Besides, it can make a good trade-off with machine learning methods on precision, determinacy (or robustness), and interpretability. In practice, this work contributes to industrial companies without enough computing resources but who pursue good results based on small data during their early stage of development and who require high interpretability to better understand and carry out their business.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36266407      PMCID: PMC9585049          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21607-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  9 in total

Review 1.  Exploring complex networks.

Authors:  S H Strogatz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Rich-club organization of the human connectome.

Authors:  Martijn P van den Heuvel; Olaf Sporns
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

Authors:  J E Hirsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  k-Core organization of complex networks.

Authors:  S N Dorogovtsev; A V Goltsev; J F F Mendes
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  The graph neural network model.

Authors:  Franco Scarselli; Marco Gori; Ah Chung Tsoi; Markus Hagenbuchner; Gabriele Monfardini
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  2008-12-09

6.  The H-index of a network node and its relation to degree and coreness.

Authors:  Linyuan Lü; Tao Zhou; Qian-Ming Zhang; H Eugene Stanley
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  MIGAN: Mutual-Interaction Graph Attention Network for Collaborative Filtering.

Authors:  Ahlem Drif; Hocine Cherifi
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.738

8.  Principled approach to the selection of the embedding dimension of networks.

Authors:  Weiwei Gu; Aditya Tandon; Yong-Yeol Ahn; Filippo Radicchi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.