| Literature DB >> 36266403 |
Maja Guberina1,2, Ken Herrmann3,4, Christoph Pöttgen5, Nika Guberina5, Hubertus Hautzel3,4, Thomas Gauler5, Till Ploenes6, Lale Umutlu7, Axel Wetter7, Dirk Theegarten8, Clemens Aigner6, Wilfried E E Eberhardt9,10, Martin Metzenmacher9,10, Marcel Wiesweg9,10, Martin Schuler3,9,10, Rüdiger Karpf-Wissel11, Alina Santiago Garcia5, Kaid Darwiche11, Martin Stuschke5,3.
Abstract
Accurate determination of lymph-node (LN) metastases is a prerequisite for high precision radiotherapy. The primary aim is to characterise the performance of PET/CT-based machine-learning classifiers to predict LN-involvement by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in stage-III NSCLC. Prediction models for LN-positivity based on [18F]FDG-PET/CT features were built using logistic regression and machine-learning models random forest (RF) and multilayer perceptron neural network (MLP) for stage-III NSCLC before radiochemotherapy. A total of 675 LN-stations were sampled in 180 patients. The logistic and RF models identified SUVmax, the short-axis LN-diameter and the echelon of the considered LN among the most important parameters for EBUS-positivity. Adjusting the sensitivity of machine-learning classifiers to that of the expert-rater of 94.5%, MLP (P = 0.0061) and RF models (P = 0.038) showed lower misclassification rates (MCR) than the standard-report, weighting false positives and false negatives equally. Increasing the sensitivity of classifiers from 94.5 to 99.3% resulted in increase of MCR from 13.3/14.5 to 29.8/34.2% for MLP/RF, respectively. PET/CT-based machine-learning classifiers can achieve a high sensitivity (94.5%) to detect EBUS-positive LNs at a low misclassification rate. As the specificity decreases rapidly above that level, a combined test of a PET/CT-based MLP/RF classifier and EBUS-TBNA is recommended for radiation target volume definition.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36266403 PMCID: PMC9584941 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21637-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996