Literature DB >> 36266334

Flexible learning of quantum states with generative query neural networks.

Yan Zhu1, Ya-Dong Wu2, Ge Bai1, Dong-Sheng Wang3, Yuexuan Wang1,4, Giulio Chiribella5,6,7.   

Abstract

Deep neural networks are a powerful tool for characterizing quantum states. Existing networks are typically trained with experimental data gathered from the quantum state that needs to be characterized. But is it possible to train a neural network offline, on a different set of states? Here we introduce a network that can be trained with classically simulated data from a fiducial set of states and measurements, and can later be used to characterize quantum states that share structural similarities with the fiducial states. With little guidance of quantum physics, the network builds its own data-driven representation of a quantum state, and then uses it to predict the outcome statistics of quantum measurements that have not been performed yet. The state representations produced by the network can also be used for tasks beyond the prediction of outcome statistics, including clustering of quantum states and identification of different phases of matter.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36266334      PMCID: PMC9584912          DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33928-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   17.694


  18 in total

1.  Practical characterization of quantum devices without tomography.

Authors:  Marcus P da Silva; Olivier Landon-Cardinal; David Poulin
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Onset of a quantum phase transition with a trapped ion quantum simulator.

Authors:  R Islam; E E Edwards; K Kim; S Korenblit; C Noh; H Carmichael; G-D Lin; L-M Duan; C-C Joseph Wang; J K Freericks; C Monroe
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Quantum state tomography via compressed sensing.

Authors:  David Gross; Yi-Kai Liu; Steven T Flammia; Stephen Becker; Jens Eisert
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Permutationally invariant quantum tomography.

Authors:  G Tóth; W Wieczorek; D Gross; R Krischek; C Schwemmer; H Weinfurter
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Neural scene representation and rendering.

Authors:  S M Ali Eslami; Danilo Jimenez Rezende; Frederic Besse; Fabio Viola; Ari S Morcos; Marta Garnelo; Avraham Ruderman; Andrei A Rusu; Ivo Danihelka; Karol Gregor; David P Reichert; Lars Buesing; Theophane Weber; Oriol Vinyals; Dan Rosenbaum; Neil Rabinowitz; Helen King; Chloe Hillier; Matt Botvinick; Daan Wierstra; Koray Kavukcuoglu; Demis Hassabis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Latent Space Purification via Neural Density Operators.

Authors:  Giacomo Torlai; Roger G Melko
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  The box plot: a simple visual method to interpret data.

Authors:  D F Williamson; R A Parker; J S Kendrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Discovering Physical Concepts with Neural Networks.

Authors:  Raban Iten; Tony Metger; Henrik Wilming; Lídia Del Rio; Renato Renner
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 9.161

9.  Cross-Platform Verification of Intermediate Scale Quantum Devices.

Authors:  Andreas Elben; Benoît Vermersch; Rick van Bijnen; Christian Kokail; Tiff Brydges; Christine Maier; Manoj K Joshi; Rainer Blatt; Christian F Roos; Peter Zoller
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 9.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.