Literature DB >> 36266298

Technology readiness levels for machine learning systems.

Alexander Lavin1,2, Ciarán M Gilligan-Lee3,4, Alessya Visnjic5, Siddha Ganju6,7, Dava Newman8, Sujoy Ganguly9, Danny Lange9, Atílím Güneş Baydin10, Amit Sharma11, Adam Gibson12, Stephan Zheng13, Eric P Xing14,15, Chris Mattmann16, James Parr6, Yarin Gal17.   

Abstract

The development and deployment of machine learning systems can be executed easily with modern tools, but the process is typically rushed and means-to-an-end. Lack of diligence can lead to technical debt, scope creep and misaligned objectives, model misuse and failures, and expensive consequences. Engineering systems, on the other hand, follow well-defined processes and testing standards to streamline development for high-quality, reliable results. The extreme is spacecraft systems, with mission critical measures and robustness throughout the process. Drawing on experience in both spacecraft engineering and machine learning (research through product across domain areas), we've developed a proven systems engineering approach for machine learning and artificial intelligence: the Machine Learning Technology Readiness Levels framework defines a principled process to ensure robust, reliable, and responsible systems while being streamlined for machine learning workflows, including key distinctions from traditional software engineering, and a lingua franca for people across teams and organizations to work collaboratively on machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies. Here we describe the framework and elucidate with use-cases from physics research to computer vision apps to medical diagnostics.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36266298      PMCID: PMC9585100          DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33128-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   17.694


  14 in total

1.  Towards trustable machine learning.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 25.671

2.  The frontier of simulation-based inference.

Authors:  Kyle Cranmer; Johann Brehmer; Gilles Louppe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Diagnosing bias in data-driven algorithms for healthcare.

Authors:  Jenna Wiens; W Nicholson Price; Michael W Sjoding
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  The use of misclassification costs to learn rule-based decision support models for cost-effective hospital admission strategies.

Authors:  R Ambrosino; B G Buchanan; G F Cooper; M J Fine
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

5.  Double-adjustment in propensity score matching analysis: choosing a threshold for considering residual imbalance.

Authors:  Tri-Long Nguyen; Gary S Collins; Jessica Spence; Jean-Pierre Daurès; P J Devereaux; Paul Landais; Yannick Le Manach
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety.

Authors:  Robert Challen; Joshua Denny; Martin Pitt; Luke Gompels; Tom Edwards; Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  Collider bias undermines our understanding of COVID-19 disease risk and severity.

Authors:  Gareth J Griffith; Tim T Morris; Matthew J Tudball; Annie Herbert; Giulia Mancano; Lindsey Pike; Gemma C Sharp; Jonathan Sterne; Tom M Palmer; George Davey Smith; Kate Tilling; Luisa Zuccolo; Neil M Davies; Gibran Hemani
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 8.  Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension.

Authors:  Samantha Cruz Rivera; Xiaoxuan Liu; An-Wen Chan; Alastair K Denniston; Melanie J Calvert
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Harnessing the Power of Real-World Evidence (RWE): A Checklist to Ensure Regulatory-Grade Data Quality.

Authors:  Rebecca A Miksad; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Regulatory Frameworks for Development and Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnostic Imaging Algorithms: Summary and Recommendations.

Authors:  David B Larson; Hugh Harvey; Daniel L Rubin; Neville Irani; Justin R Tse; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.532

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.