Literature DB >> 36264999

Circular bioeconomy in African food systems: What is the status quo? Insights from Rwanda, DRC, and Ethiopia.

Haruna Sekabira1, Elke Nijman1, Leonhard Späth2,3, Pius Krütli3, Marc Schut1,4, Bernard Vanlauwe5, Benjamin Wilde2, Kokou Kintche6, Speciose Kantengwa1, Abayneh Feyso7, Byamungu Kigangu6, Johan Six2.   

Abstract

Increasing global food insecurity amidst a growing population and diminishing production resources renders the currently dominant linear production model insufficient to combat such challenges. Hence, a circular bioeconomy (CBE) model that ensures more conservative use of resources has become essential. Specifically, a CBE model that focuses on recycling and reusing organic waste is essential to close nutrient loops and establish more resilient rural-urban nexus food systems. However, the CBE status quo in many African food systems is not established. Moreover, scientific evidence on CBE in Africa is almost inexistent, thus limiting policy guidance to achieving circular food systems. Using a sample of about 2,100 farmers and consumers from key food value chains (cassava in Rwanda, coffee in DRC, and bananas in Ethiopia), we explored existing CBE practices; awareness, knowledge, and support for CBE practices; consumers' opinions on eating foods grown on processed organic waste (CBE fertilizers), and determinants of such opinions. We analysed data in Stata, first descriptively, and then econometrically using the ordered logistic regression, whose proportional odds assumption was violated, thus resorting to the generalized ordered logistic regression. Results show that communities practice aspects of CBE, mainly composting, and are broadly aware, knowledgeable, supportive of CBE practices, and would broadly accept eating foods grown CBE fertilizers. Households with heads that used mobile phones, or whose heads were older, or married, or had a better education and agricultural incomes were more likely to strongly agree that they were knowledgeable and supportive of CBE practices and would eat CBE foods (foods grown on processed organic waste). However, the reverse was true for households that were severely food insecure or lived farther from towns. Rwandan and Ethiopian households compared to DRC were less likely to eat CB foods. Policies to stimulate CBE investments in all three countries were largely absent, and quality scientific evidence to guide their development and implementation is currently insufficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36264999      PMCID: PMC9584527          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  14 in total

1.  Low use of rural maternity services in Uganda: impact of women's status, traditional beliefs and limited resources.

Authors:  Grace Bantebya Kyomuhendo
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2003-05

Review 2.  A systematic review of fast food access studies.

Authors:  S E Fleischhacker; K R Evenson; D A Rodriguez; A S Ammerman
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 9.213

3.  Policy: Five cornerstones of a global bioeconomy.

Authors:  Beate El-Chichakli; Joachim von Braun; Christine Lang; Daniel Barben; Jim Philp
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Can sub-Saharan Africa feed itself?

Authors:  Martin K van Ittersum; Lenny G J van Bussel; Joost Wolf; Patricio Grassini; Justin van Wart; Nicolas Guilpart; Lieven Claessens; Hugo de Groot; Keith Wiebe; Daniel Mason-D'Croz; Haishun Yang; Hendrik Boogaard; Pepijn A J van Oort; Marloes P van Loon; Kazuki Saito; Ochieng Adimo; Samuel Adjei-Nsiah; Alhassane Agali; Abdullahi Bala; Regis Chikowo; Kayuki Kaizzi; Mamoutou Kouressy; Joachim H J R Makoi; Korodjouma Ouattara; Kindie Tesfaye; Kenneth G Cassman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A Parental Health Education Model of Children's Food Consumption: Influence on Children's Attitudes, Intention, and Consumption of Healthy and Unhealthy Foods.

Authors:  May O Lwin; Wonsun Shin; Andrew Z H Yee; Reidinar Juliane Wardoyo
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2017-03-31

6.  Adopt or Adapt: Sanitation Technology Choices in Urbanizing Malawi.

Authors:  Richard M Chunga; Jeroen H J Ensink; Marion W Jenkins; Joe Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Is increasing inorganic fertilizer use for maize production in SSA a profitable proposition? Evidence from Nigeria.

Authors:  Lenis Saweda O Liverpool-Tasie; Bolarin T Omonona; Awa Sanou; Wale O Ogunleye
Journal:  Food Policy       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Inventory and composting of yard waste in Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

Authors:  Mohammad Hariz Abdul Rahman; Tosiah Sadi; Aimi Athirah Ahmad; Intan Nadhirah Masri; Masnira Mohammad Yusoff; Hasliana Kamaruddin; Nur Alyani Shakri; Mohamad Abhar Akmal Hamid; Rashidah Ab Malek
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-07-17

9.  Nutrition quality of food purchases varies by household income: the SHoPPER study.

Authors:  Simone A French; Christy C Tangney; Melissa M Crane; Yamin Wang; Bradley M Appelhans
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Bioeconomy from experts' perspectives - Results of a global expert survey.

Authors:  Irwa Issa; Sebastian Delbrück; Ulrich Hamm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.