Literature DB >> 36264864

Human knowledge models: Learning applied knowledge from the data.

Egor Dudyrev1, Ilia Semenkov1,2, Sergei O Kuznetsov1, Gleb Gusev2, Andrew Sharp3, Oleg S Pianykh3,4.   

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and machine learning have demonstrated remarkable results in science and applied work. However, present AI models, developed to be run on computers but used in human-driven applications, create a visible disconnect between AI forms of processing and human ways of discovering and using knowledge. In this work, we introduce a new concept of "Human Knowledge Models" (HKMs), designed to reproduce human computational abilities. Departing from a vast body of cognitive research, we formalized the definition of HKMs into a new form of machine learning. Then, by training the models with human processing capabilities, we learned human-like knowledge, that humans can not only understand, but also compute, modify, and apply. We used several datasets from different applied fields to demonstrate the advantages of HKMs, including their high predictive power and resistance to noise and overfitting. Our results proved that HKMs can efficiently mine knowledge directly from the data and can compete with complex AI models in explaining the main data patterns. As a result, our study reveals the great potential of HKMs, particularly in the decision-making applications where "black box" models cannot be accepted. Moreover, this improves our understanding of how well human decision-making, modeled by HKMs, can approach the ideal solutions in real-life problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36264864      PMCID: PMC9584406          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  10 in total

1.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Complex mental arithmetic: the contribution of the number sense.

Authors:  Julie Nys; Alain Content
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2010-09

3.  Capacity limits of information processing in the brain.

Authors:  René Marois; Jason Ivanoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Extraneous factors in judicial decisions.

Authors:  Shai Danziger; Jonathan Levav; Liora Avnaim-Pesso
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Emotion and decision making.

Authors:  Jennifer S Lerner; Ye Li; Piercarlo Valdesolo; Karim S Kassam
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning.

Authors:  W James Murdoch; Chandan Singh; Karl Kumbier; Reza Abbasi-Asl; Bin Yu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  How many variables can humans process?

Authors:  Graeme S Halford; Rosemary Baker; Julie E McCredden; John D Bain
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-01

8.  Neural substrates of cognitive capacity limitations.

Authors:  Timothy J Buschman; Markus Siegel; Jefferson E Roy; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead.

Authors:  Cynthia Rudin
Journal:  Nat Mach Intell       Date:  2019-05-13

10.  A machine learning model with human cognitive biases capable of learning from small and biased datasets.

Authors:  Hidetaka Taniguchi; Hiroshi Sato; Tomohiro Shirakawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.