Emily R Mackler1, Michelle K Azar2, Emily Johengen3, Karen B Farris4,5, Amy N Thompson5. 1. Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium (MOQC) and Michigan Institute for Care Management and Transformation (MICMT), 4251 Plymouth Road Arbor Lakes, Building 3, Floor 3, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA. estunteb@med.umich.edu. 2. Johns Hopkins Department of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Trinity Health IHA Medical Group Hematology Oncology, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium (MOQC) and Michigan Institute for Care Management and Transformation (MICMT), 4251 Plymouth Road Arbor Lakes, Building 3, Floor 3, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA. 5. College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A focus on oral medications for patients receiving care from both oncologists and primary care providers elicits an opportunity for improvement in patient outcomes. The purpose of this pilot study was to explore the feasibility and appropriateness of a comprehensive medication review (CMR) by a primary care pharmacist in a population of patients with cancer and chronic conditions. METHODS: Adult patients who received both cancer and primary care at Michigan Medicine, received active systemic cancer treatment, and had a comorbid condition of diabetes, hypertension, chronic heart failure, depression, and/or anxiety were eligible to receive a CMR by the primary care clinical pharmacist. Data collected included number eligible for the CMR (feasibility), patient demographics, medication-related problems (MRPs) and medication interventions (appropriate), number of patients requiring follow-up with the clinical pharmacist or physician, and pre/post-intervention changes in A1c and BP, as applicable. RESULTS: Of the 96 patients that met inclusion criteria, 55 patients (57%) received a CMR. Pharmacists provided 66 instances of patient education and identified 22 medication-related problems (MRPs) in 15 (27%) of patients. After CMRs were completed, 22 patients (40%) were referred to primary care pharmacists or physician providers for ongoing care. CONCLUSION: A CMR was feasible and appropriate for patients with chronic conditions receiving treatment for cancer.
PURPOSE: A focus on oral medications for patients receiving care from both oncologists and primary care providers elicits an opportunity for improvement in patient outcomes. The purpose of this pilot study was to explore the feasibility and appropriateness of a comprehensive medication review (CMR) by a primary care pharmacist in a population of patients with cancer and chronic conditions. METHODS: Adult patients who received both cancer and primary care at Michigan Medicine, received active systemic cancer treatment, and had a comorbid condition of diabetes, hypertension, chronic heart failure, depression, and/or anxiety were eligible to receive a CMR by the primary care clinical pharmacist. Data collected included number eligible for the CMR (feasibility), patient demographics, medication-related problems (MRPs) and medication interventions (appropriate), number of patients requiring follow-up with the clinical pharmacist or physician, and pre/post-intervention changes in A1c and BP, as applicable. RESULTS: Of the 96 patients that met inclusion criteria, 55 patients (57%) received a CMR. Pharmacists provided 66 instances of patient education and identified 22 medication-related problems (MRPs) in 15 (27%) of patients. After CMRs were completed, 22 patients (40%) were referred to primary care pharmacists or physician providers for ongoing care. CONCLUSION: A CMR was feasible and appropriate for patients with chronic conditions receiving treatment for cancer.
Authors: M E Stegmann; T M Homburg; J M Meijer; J Nuver; K Havenga; T J N Hiltermann; J H Maduro; J Schuling; D Brandenbarg; A J Berendsen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 3.603