| Literature DB >> 36263425 |
Guo Huang1,2,3, Huan Li1,2,3, Shuang Lai1, Jialing Xiao1,2,3, Liang Wang1, Huijuan Xu1, Chuntao Lei4, Jinglan Zhang1, Man Yu4, Ping Shuai1, Yuping Liu1, Yi Shi1, Kaijie Wang5, Bo Gong1,2,3.
Abstract
Purpose: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of vision loss. A Previous study based on the co-localization analysis of the genome-wide association study (GWAS) and eQTL genetic signals have reported that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), including rs760975, rs11528744, rs3761159, rs7212510, rs6965458, rs7559693, rs56108400, rs28495773, rs9928736, rs11777697, rs4381465 are associated with AMD in Americans. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of these SNPs in a Han Chinese population.Entities:
Keywords: B3GLCT; BCRA1; HTRA1; age-related macular degeneration (AMD); case-control study; single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)
Year: 2022 PMID: 36263425 PMCID: PMC9574478 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.997840
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.772
FIGURE 1Comparison of health and AMD human retina. (A) Normal human fundus image of the left eye. (B) Fundus image of a patient with left eye wet AMD, with drusen, exudate, subretinal hemorrhage and scarring at the macular region. (C) OCT image of normal macula. (D) OCT image of wet AMD macula. AMD, age-related macular degeneration; OCT, optical coherence tomography.
Basic Information of the groups.
| Groups | Healthy controls | AMD cases |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age(year, mean ± SD) | 70.57 ± 9.58 | 64.79±8.85 |
| |
| gender | Male | 275 | 398 |
|
| Female | 297 | 178 | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.91 ± 2.58 | 22.80 ± 2.36 |
| |
Basic information and allele frequencies of the 11 selected SNPs.
| SNP (gene name) | Chromosome | Gene locus | Allele | Minor allele frequency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Control | ||||
| rs760975 (BAIAP2L2) | 22q13.1 | 38,071,777 | G/C | 0.181 | 0.174 |
| rs11528744 (HTRA1) | 10q21.2 | 122,534,138 | C/T | 0.500 | 0.418 |
| rs3761159 (SLC12A5-AS1) | 20q11.1 | 46,006,318 | C/T | 0.220 | 0.230 |
| rs7212510 (TMEM199) | 17q21.1 | 28,376,663 | T/A | 0.277 | 0.289 |
| rs6965458 (PILRB) | 7q11.23 | 100,375,779 | A/G | 0.030 | 0.039 |
| rs7559693 (COL4A3) | 2q14.1 | 227,254,233 | G/C | 0.291 | 0.247 |
| rs56108400 (AC009779.3) | 12q14 | 55,819,513 | T/G | 0.343 | 0.306 |
| rs28495773 (PILRB) | 7q11.23 | 100,345,960 | T/A | 0.027 | 0.035 |
| rs9928736 (BCAR1) | 16q11.2 | 75,208,831 | C/T | 0.112 | 0.153 |
| rs11777697 (TNFRSF10A) | 8q13 | 23,231,471 | G/C | 0.354 | 0.318 |
| rs4381465 (B3GLCT) | 13q21.1 | 31,133,338 | A/T | 0.060 | 0.094 |
The SNPs, positions were from the Human Assembly February 2009 (GRCh37/hg19).
The genotype frequencies and association analysis of 11 SNPs in AMD cases and controls.
| SNP (gene name) | Genotype frequency (%) | HWE | Allele | Corrected | Or (95%CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype | AMD cases | Healthy controls | AMD | Controls | P | P | ||
| rs760975 (BAIAP2L2) | GG | 28(0.049) | 21(0.037) | 0.009 | 0.275 | 0.695 | 7.645 | 1.044 |
| GC | 152(0.274) | 156(0.273) | (0.842–1.294) | |||||
| CC | 396(0.677) | 391(0.684) | ||||||
| rs11528744 (HTRA1) | CC | 151(0.267) | 104(0.182) | 0.243 | 0.443 | 0 | 0 | 1.391 |
| CT | 274(0.444) | 268(0.469) | (1.179–1.640) | |||||
| TT | 151(0.288) | 197(0.344) | ||||||
| rs3761159 (SLC12A5-AS1) | CC | 24(0.045) | 30(0.052) | 0.346 | 0.97 | 0.573 | 6.303 | 0.945 |
| CT | 205(0.351) | 202(0.353) | (0.777–1.150) | |||||
| TT | 345(0.601) | 337(0.589) | ||||||
| rs7212510 (TMEM199) | TT | 47(0.080) | 45(0.079) | 0.527 | 0.602 | 0.504 | 5.544 | 0.940 |
| TA | 224(0.375) | 239(0.418) | (0.783–1.127) | |||||
| AA | 304(0.542) | 285(0.498) | ||||||
| rs6965458 (PILRB) | AA | 2(0.003) | 3(0.005) | 0.038 | 0.015 | 0.277 | 3.047 | 0.779 |
| AG | 31(0.056) | 38(0.066) | (0.496–1.224) | |||||
| GA | 542(0.941) | 527(0.921) | ||||||
| rs7559693 (COL4A3) | GG | 44(0.073) | 27(0.047) | 0.353 | 0.081 | 0.019 | 0.209 | 1.248 |
| GC | 246(0.441) | 227(0.397) | (1.037–1.503) | |||||
| CC | 284(0.483) | 314(0.549) | ||||||
| rs56108400 (AC009779.3) | TT | 65(0.101) | 48(0.084) | 0.615 | 0.304 | 0.058 | 0.638 | 1.185 |
| TG | 265(0.458) | 252(0.441) | (0.994–1.411) | |||||
| GG | 246(0.441) | 269(0.470) | ||||||
| rs28495773 (PILRB) | TT | 1(0) | 1(0.002) | 0.358 | 0.68 | 0.306 | 3.366 | 0.779 |
| TA | 29(0.052) | 37(0.065) | (0.483–1.258) | |||||
| AA | 542(0.941) | 527(0.921) | ||||||
| rs9928736 (BCAR1) | CC | 10(0.010) | 15(0.026) | 0.218 | 0.569 | 0.004 | 0.044 | 0.695 |
| CT | 107(0.188) | 143(0.250) | (0.544–0.888) | |||||
| TT | 452(0.788) | 407(0.712) | ||||||
| rs11777697 (TNFRSF10A) | GG | 55(0.104) | 62(0.108) | 0.002 | 0.393 | 0.07 | 0.77 | 1.174 |
| GC | 297(0.507) | 238(0.416) | (0.987–1.397) | |||||
| CC | 223(0.385) | 269(0.470) | ||||||
| rs4381465 (B3GLCT) | AA | 1(0.003) | 3(0.005) | 0.429 | 0.316 | 0.002 | 0.022 | 0.614 |
| AT | 67(0.125) | 101(0.177) | (0.448–0.841) | |||||
| TT | 507(0.868) | 464(0.811) | ||||||
HWE, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; p < 0.05 was considered significant, Bonferroni multiple comparison.
Association analysis between three SNPs and AMD in four genetic models.
| SNP (gene name) | Homozygote | Heterozygote | Dominant | Recessive | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | OR(95%CI) | P | OR(95%CI) | P | OR(95%CI) | P | OR(95%CI) | |
| rs11528744(C) | 0.000 | 1.894(1.365–2.628) | 0.037 | 1.334(1.017–1.749) | 0.002 | 1.491(1.567–1.807) | 0.001 | 1.589(1.198–1.926) |
| (HTRA1) | ||||||||
| rs9928736(C) | 0.213 | 0.600(0.267–1.351) | 0.006 | 0.674(0.507–0.895) | 0.004 | 0.667(0.507–0.808) | 0.303 | 0.656(0.292–0.795) |
| (BCAR1) | ||||||||
| rs4381465(A) | 0.277 | 0.305(0.0.32–0.943) | 0.003 | 0.607(0.435–0.847) | 0.002 | 0.598(0.430–0.725) | 0.311 | 0.328(0.034–0.398) |
| (B3GLCT) | ||||||||
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; A, minor allele; B, major allele. Genotype (AA/AB/BB) analyses were conducted for the homozygous model (AA, compared with BB), heterozygous model (AB, compared with BB), dominant model (AA + AB, compared with BB), and recessive model (AA, compared with AB + BB). p < 0.0125 was considered significant, Bonferroni multiple comparisons.