Literature DB >> 36263397

Age, sex, race, BMI, and duration of diabetes differences in cardiovascular outcomes with glucose lowering drugs in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Alhassane Diallo1, Miguel Carlos-Bolumbu2, Florence Galtier1.   

Abstract

Background: Summarized data of cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have shown a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), whether these benefits are extended in certain risk groups (elderly or obese patients or those with a longer duration of diabetes) or certain minorities (Black participants) are not clearly established. We aimed to provide overall hazard ratios (HRs) estimates for MACE of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs stratified by age (< 65 years vs. ≥ 65 years and < 75 years vs. ≥ 75 years), sex (male vs. female), race (Black vs. White, Black vs. Asian, and White vs. Asian), body mass index (BMI: < 30 kg/m2 vs. ≥ 30 kg/m2), and duration of diabetes (< 10 years vs. ≥ 10 years).
Methods: We performed a MEDLINE database search from inception up to July 31, 2022 to identify all placebo-controlled phase 3 CVOTs that evaluated the efficacy of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs on vascular events at least 1-year after randomisation in participants with type 2 diabetes, and we selected those reporting hazard ratios (HRs) for the specific risk groups for MACE. Differences on MACE in risk groups were examined using a random-effect meta-analysis. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022347901). Findings: A total of 11 studies fulfilled the prespecified criteria, comprising 96,580 patients with T2D were included. Of these patients, 61,975 (64.2%) were male, 34,605 (35.8%) were female, and race groups included 74,982 (77.6%) White, 7760 (8.0%) Asian, and 4023 (4.2%) Black. In two SGLT2i trials, the HR (95% CI) for long-term diabetes duration more than10 years versus short duration was 0.84 (0.77-0.93) vs. 1.02 (0.89-1.16), respectively (P interaction = 0.03). In four SGLT2i trials, the MACE benefit was similar by sex (P interaction = 0.13), age (P interaction = 0.36), BMI (P interaction = 0.69), and race groups (P interaction = 0.86 between Black and White, P interaction = 0.98 between Black and Asian, and P interaction = 0.69 between White and Asian). For GLP-1 RAs, the MACE benefit from the seven trials tended to be greater for Asian (0.71, [0.58-0.87]) than for White (0.87, [0.81-0.94]), (P interaction = 0.07). In two GLP-1 RAs trials, the MACE outcome was reduced by 22% (0.78, 0.63-0.95) in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) while no difference was observed in those < 75 years (0.87; 0.75-1.01), (P interaction = 0.37). In the remaining risk groups, the MACE benefit was similar by sex (P interaction = 0.37), age < 65 years (P interaction = 0.80), duration of diabetes (P interaction = 0.70), and race (P interaction = 0.57 between Black and White, and P interaction = 0.15 between Black and Asian), BMI (P interaction = 0.78). Risk of bias was lower, and overall heterogeneity was high for sex with SGLT2i, and moderate to low for the remaining comparisons, with a I2 values ranging from 0% to 54%. Interpretation: In patients with type 2 diabetes at highest risk of cardiovascular disease or established cardiovascular disease, a greater benefit on MACE was found for elderly patients and for Asian individuals compared with White individuals with GLP-1 RAs, and those with a long duration of diabetes with SGLT2i. These findings could help in providing guidance for treatment prescription and facilitate selection and stratification of patients for future CVOTs. Furthermore, pooled individual patient-level data are urgently needed to support our conclusions, and to derive definitive evidence. Funding: None.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CVOTs; MACE; Meta-analysis; Risk group differences

Year:  2022        PMID: 36263397      PMCID: PMC9574412          DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EClinicalMedicine        ISSN: 2589-5370


  28 in total

1.  Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Steven P Marso; Stephen C Bain; Agostino Consoli; Freddy G Eliaschewitz; Esteban Jódar; Lawrence A Leiter; Ildiko Lingvay; Julio Rosenstock; Jochen Seufert; Mark L Warren; Vincent Woo; Oluf Hansen; Anders G Holst; Jonas Pettersson; Tina Vilsbøll
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Oral Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Mansoor Husain; Andreas L Birkenfeld; Morten Donsmark; Kathleen Dungan; Freddy G Eliaschewitz; Denise R Franco; Ole K Jeppesen; Ildiko Lingvay; Ofri Mosenzon; Sue D Pedersen; Cees J Tack; Mette Thomsen; Tina Vilsbøll; Mark L Warren; Stephen C Bain
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Effect of BMI on lifetime risk for diabetes in the U.S.

Authors:  K M V Narayan; James P Boyle; Theodore J Thompson; Edward W Gregg; David F Williamson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Stephen D Wiviott; Itamar Raz; Marc P Bonaca; Ofri Mosenzon; Eri T Kato; Avivit Cahn; Michael G Silverman; Thomas A Zelniker; Julia F Kuder; Sabina A Murphy; Deepak L Bhatt; Lawrence A Leiter; Darren K McGuire; John P H Wilding; Christian T Ruff; Ingrid A M Gause-Nilsson; Martin Fredriksson; Peter A Johansson; Anna-Maria Langkilde; Marc S Sabatine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Bernard Zinman; Christoph Wanner; John M Lachin; David Fitchett; Erich Bluhmki; Stefan Hantel; Michaela Mattheus; Theresa Devins; Odd Erik Johansen; Hans J Woerle; Uli C Broedl; Silvio E Inzucchi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Bruce Neal; Vlado Perkovic; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Dick de Zeeuw; Greg Fulcher; Ngozi Erondu; Wayne Shaw; Gordon Law; Mehul Desai; David R Matthews
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Adrian F Hernandez; Jennifer B Green; Salim Janmohamed; Ralph B D'Agostino; Christopher B Granger; Nigel P Jones; Lawrence A Leiter; Anne E Rosenberg; Kristina N Sigmon; Matthew C Somerville; Karl M Thorpe; John J V McMurray; Stefano Del Prato
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Meta-analyses of Results From Randomized Outcome Trials Comparing Cardiovascular Effects of SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs in Asian Versus White Patients With and Without Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Matthew M Y Lee; Nazim Ghouri; Darren K McGuire; Martin K Rutter; Naveed Sattar
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Gender difference in response predictors after 1-year exenatide therapy twice daily in type 2 diabetic patients: a real world experience.

Authors:  Roberto Anichini; Sabrina Cosimi; Alberto Di Carlo; Paola Orsini; Alessandra De Bellis; Giuseppe Seghieri; Flavia Franconi; Fabio Baccetti
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.168

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.