| Literature DB >> 36262996 |
Abstract
Currently, the prevalence of dwarfism in children in China is about 3%, which is a very large percentage compared with the large population base. With the increase of influencing factors, the prevalence of dwarfism is on the increase. However, there is a lack of awareness of dwarfism among parents and a lack of in-depth analysis of the causes of dwarfism and a low level of treatment among doctors. Early expert system knowledge base relies on manual editing, which is a traditional, semi-intelligent auxiliary diagnostic system, and is unable to perform disease diagnosis and clinical treatment monitoring well. Many studies have turned to the combination of IoT for bone age determination and its role in the diagnosis and monitoring of clinical treatment of dwarfism. In this study, 15 children with short stature who underwent health checkups at a hospital were enrolled in the study, and a G-P spectrum method was used to determine the bone age of all the enrolled subjects, and the results obtained in the process of bone age determination were systematically analyzed. The results showed that the bone age measurement technique has sufficient reference value for evaluating the quality and diagnosing diseases, and the research and development of this technique is of great significance for the development of modern clinical medicine.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36262996 PMCID: PMC9546694 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7247932
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Figure 1Development history of medical IoT system in China.
Figure 2Overall framework of medical IoT system based on IoT technology.
Figure 3Clinical thought diagram for diagnosis.
Figure 4Laboratory thought diagram for diagnosis.
Description of attributes.
| Serial number | Property name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sex | Depending on the gender of the child, the doctor will perform different tests. Gender is divided into male and female |
| 2 | Growth rate | The number of centimeters of growth per year is used to determine whether the child is growing slowly or normally. In general, children between the ages of 1 and 18 grow 1–8 cm per year. |
| 3 | Body mass | We can determine whether the growth is uniform or deformed by looking at the size of the child. |
| 4 | Bone age | Bone age is examined and compared with the true age. The values are normal bone age and lagging bone age. |
| 5 | Father's height | To determine whether the father is short by checking the father's height. |
| 6 | Mother's height | The height of the mother was examined to determine whether the mother was short. |
| 7 | Family history | To determine whether the height of close relatives in the family is hereditary or not. The values are yes and no. |
| 8 | Maternal smoking during pregnancy | To check whether the mother smoked during pregnancy and the age of smoking. The range of values is 0–30. |
| 9 | Maternal hypertension during pregnancy | To check whether the mother had high blood pressure during pregnancy. The values were yes and no. |
| 10 | Maternal pregnancy hypertension | To check whether the mother has hyperemesis during pregnancy. The values were yes and no. |
| 11 | Adolescence | To find out the time of puberty. Values are normal, early. |
| 12 | Thyroid function | The values of FT3 and FT4 in laboratory tests are normal and abnormal. The values are normal and abnormal. |
| 13 | Chromosome karyotype | In special cases, the karyotype of the chromosome is examined. The values are normal and variable. |
| 14 | CT/MRI | The size of the pituitary gland and the presence of occupational lesions are observed. The values are normal and abnormal. |
Partial data after numerical attribute value.
| Sex | Bone age | Body mass | Growth rate | Adolescence | Maternal pregnancy symptoms | … | LH/PSH | GH | Thyroid function | IGF-1 | Chromosomes | CT/MRI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | … | 0.45 | 0.88 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.4 | 0 | 1 | … | 0.31 | 4.33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 4.3 | 0 | 0 | … | 0.88 | 1.22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | … | 0.24 | 3.67 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | … | 1.76 | 12.67 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 3.6 | 0 | 1 | … | 0.53 | 4.36 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | … | 0.54 | 10.08 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | … | 1.24 | 3.69 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | … | 10.20 | 10.22 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | … | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Figure 5Change curve of height and weight of male children.
Figure 6Change curve of height and weight of girls in China in 2005.
Figure 7Diagnostic process of dwarfism.
Distribution of the number of cases and number of cases at different ages for the etiology of 103 children with dwarfism.
| Etiology | Number of cases [ | <6 years old | Undeveloped over 6 years old | Developed over 6 years old |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete GHD | 3 (4.3) | 1 | 8 | 5 |
| Partial GHD | 5 (18.1) | 8 | 38 | 9 |
| ISS | 39 (45.5) | 36 | 77 | 26 |
| Familial dwarfism | 13 (3.7) | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| SGA | 9 (9.0) | 7 | 19 | 3 |
| Thyroid function | 9 (3.4) | 1 | 7 | 1 |
| Somatic delayed puberty | 7 (5.8) | 0 | 5 | 11 |
| Turner syndrome | 11 (3.2) | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| Precocious puberty | 7 (2.4) | 0 | 10 | 7 |
| MPHD | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Chondrodysplasia | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0 |
Comparison between age and bone age development of children with different etiologies of dwarfism ().
| Etiology | Number of cases | Age | Bone age | Age difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete GHD | 3 | 10.85 ± 3.11 | 8.39 ± 2.81 | 1.463 ± 0.68 |
| Partial GHD | 4 | 9.3 ± 2.93 | 6.97 ± 2.72 | 2.263 ± 0.56 |
| ISS | 39 | 8.31 ± 2.95 | 7.35 ± 2.87 | 0.955 ± 0.75 |
| Familial dwarfism | 13 | 9.92 ± 3.52 | 9.29 ± 3.57 | 0.584 ± 0.49 |
| SGA | 9 | 7.62 ± 2.69 | 6.55 ± 2.47 | 1.06 ± 0.53 |
| Thyroid function | 9 | 10.51 ± 1.99 | 6.13 ± 2.11 | 4.31 ± 1.79 |
| Somatic delayed puberty | 7 | 14.88 ± 0.75 | 10.64 ± 0.79 | 4.15 ± 0.69 |
| Turner syndrome | 11 | 9.35 ± 2.82 | 7.25 ± 2.33 | 4.19 ± 0.62 |
| MPHD | 9 | 9.32 ± 2.89 | 7.25 ± 2.53 | 2.03 ± 0.81 |
|
| 12.506 | 5.686 | 86.682 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |