| Literature DB >> 36262979 |
Abstract
Objective: To formulate corresponding nursing humanistic care measures according to the needs of patients, evaluate the intervention effect of patients, and provide reference for nursing staff to better provide nursing humanistic care for patients with schizophrenia in convalescence.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36262979 PMCID: PMC9553477 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4705107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Figure 1The dropout of patients.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of comparison of general information of patients.
Comparison of general data of patients (n = 104).
| Project | Classification | Test ( | Control ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 39 | 40 | 0.051 | 0.825 |
| Female | 15 | 14 | |||
|
| |||||
| Age (years) | ∼31 | 10 | 10 | 0.515 | 0.917 |
| 32∼46 | 20 | 21 | |||
| 47∼61 | 18 | 17 | |||
| Over 61 years old | 8 | 5 | |||
|
| |||||
| Educational level | Elementary school and below | 12 | 11 | 0.209 | 0.993 |
| Junior high school | 25 | 24 | |||
| High school or secondary school | 12 | 13 | |||
| College | 7 | 6 | |||
| Undergraduate and above | 3 | 3 | |||
|
| |||||
| Marital status | Unmarried | 12 | 11 | 0.655 | 0.723 |
| Married | 20 | 23 | |||
| Widowhood/Divorce | 25 | 22 | |||
|
| |||||
| Primary caregiver | Parent | 10 | 8 | 0.818 | 0.938 |
| Children | 15 | 16 | |||
| Spouse | 15 | 17 | |||
| Brothers and sisters | 10 | 7 | |||
| Other | 5 | 5 | |||
|
| |||||
| Number of hospitalizations | 1 time | 9 | 11 | 0.412 | 0.816 |
| 2 times | 13 | 14 | |||
| 3 times or more | 34 | 30 | |||
|
| |||||
| Years of illness | Within 1 year | 7 | 9 | 0.481 | 0.785 |
| 1∼3 years | 19 | 20 | |||
| Over 3 years | 27 | 25 | |||
|
| |||||
| Monthly household income (yuan) | Below 2000 | 11 | 9 | 0.531 | 0.764 |
| 2000∼5000 | 27 | 25 | |||
| More than 5000 | 13 | 16 | |||
|
| |||||
| Family attention | Difference | 9 | 8 | 0.163 | 0.921 |
| Generally | 25 | 27 | |||
| Better | 19 | 17 | |||
|
| |||||
| Nursing satisfaction | Dissatisfied | 10 | 9 | 0.088 | 0.956 |
| Basically satisfied | 24 | 24 | |||
| Very satisfied | 20 | 19 | |||
Comparison of nursing satisfaction of patients before and after intervention.
| Group | Before intervention | After intervention | U |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very satisfied | Basically satisfied | Dissatisfied | Total satisfaction rate (%) | Very satisfied | Basically satisfied | Dissatisfied | Total satisfaction rate (%) | |||
| Test ( | 20 | 26 | 9 | 84.5 | 38 | 15 | 3 | 96.3 | 857.1 | 0.001 |
| Control ( | 19 | 26 | 10 | 82.9 | 19 | 36 | 8 | 86.6 | 1318.1 | 0.809 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 1313.6 | 839.4 | ||||||||
|
| 0.786 | 0.001 | ||||||||
Comparison of insight and treatment attitude before and after intervention ().
| Group | Before intervention | After intervention |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test ( | 8.76 ± 2.67 | 13.36 ± 2.09 | −9.85 | 0.001 |
| Control ( | 8.65 ± 2.16 | 9.39 ± 2.02 | −1.737 | 0.081 |
|
| 0.169 | 10.022 | ||
|
| 0.866 | 0.001 |
Comparison of rehabilitation efficacy evaluation scores of patients before intervention ().
| Group | Occupational therapy | Living ability | Social skills | Pay attention to hygiene ability | Care and interest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test ( | 12.34±2.20 | 9.88±2.64 | 8.06±1.94 | 6.14±1.75 | 9.27±1.67 |
| Control ( | 12.81±2.90 | 10.16±2.46 | 7.83±1.74 | 6.01±0.58 | 8.91±1.52 |
|
| −0.937 | −0.555 | 0.526 | 0.350 | 1.051 |
|
| 0.351 | 0.577 | 0.601 | 0.726 | 0.295 |
Comparison of rehabilitation efficacy evaluation scores before and after intervention ().
| Group | Test ( |
|
| Control ( |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | |||||
| Occupational therapy | 12.35±2.19 | 8.04±1.92 | 10.721 | 0.001 | 12.81±2.89 | 11.85±2.55 | 1.823 | 0.072 |
| Living ability | 9.88±2.64 | 6.52±1.71 | 7.653 | 0.001 | 10.14±2.46 | 9.55±1.67 | 1.422 | 0.157 |
| Social skills | 8.06±1.95 | 5.17±1.04 | 9.353 | 0.001 | 7.84±1.73 | 7.65±1.02 | 0.788 | 0.432 |
| Pay attention to hygiene ability | 6.14±1.75 | 3.07±0.57 | 11.789 | 0.001 | 6.05±0.54 | 5.89±0.50 | 1.455 | 0.147 |
| Care and interest | 9.23±1.71 | 6.13±1.36 | 10.376 | 0.001 | 8.94±1.49 | 8.75±1.41 | 0.661 | 0.511 |
Comparison of rehabilitation efficacy evaluation scores of patients after intervention ().
| Group | Occupational therapy | Living ability | Social skills | Pay attention to hygiene ability | Care and interest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test ( | 11.85±2.55 | 9.57±1.67 | 7.61±1.06 | 5.86±0.51 | 8.75±1.40 |
| Control ( | 8.03±1.95 | 6.52±1.72 | 5.13±1.08 | 3.06±0.58 | 6.12±1.37 |
|
| 8.665 | 9.121 | 12.041 | 26.862 | 9.540 |
|
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Comparison of negative emotions before intervention ().
| Group | SDS | SAS |
|---|---|---|
| Test ( | 55.25±5.92 | 51.43±5.45 |
| Control ( | 54.88±5.73 | 50.02±5.52 |
|
| 0.325 | 1.293 |
|
| 0.745 | 0.197 |
Comparison of negative emotions before and after intervention ().
| Group | Test ( |
|
| Control ( |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | |||||
| SDS | 55.25±5.90 | 42.51±4.84 | 12.017 | 0.001 | 54.88±5.75 | 53.65±5.51 | 1.112 | 0.265 |
| SAS | 51.43±5.45 | 38.47±4.36 | 13.362 | 0.001 | 50.01±5.53 | 48.27±5.35 | 1.631 | 0.105 |
Comparison of negative emotions after intervention ().
| Group | SDS | SAS |
|---|---|---|
| Test ( | 53.66±5.50 | 48.27±5.39 |
| Control ( | 42.55±4.80 | 38.44±4.39 |
|
| 10.931 | 10.238 |
|
| 0.001 | 0.001 |