Anthony Nguyen1, Samir Mirza2, Nismat Javed3, Hamza Hanif4, Moon Ryu1, Rida Tariq Mirza3, Abu Baker Sheikh1. 1. University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Allbuquerque, NM, USA. 2. Dow Medical School, Department of Internal Medicine, Karachi, Pakistan. 3. Shifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan. 4. University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Department of General Surgery, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Abstract
Introduction: Acute liver failure is a cause of major mortality in the United States. Although the liver possesses regenerative capabilities, liver transplantation is the mainstay of treating acute liver failure. This modality is associated with many financial and logistic challenges. In this regard, Extracorporeal Liver Support (ECLS) might help in reducing mortality as well as bridge a patient to liver transplant. In some cases, the sequelae of liver failure such as hepatic encephalopathy and multi-organ failure can be postponed long enough for the native liver to self-recover function. With this rationale, we sought to describe the mechanism of various ECLS modalities, provide an overview of the current evidence regarding its use and to highlight future advancements that could overcome hindrances in its use. Methods: A scoping review was performed using PubMed and other databases from 1990 to 2020 with the keywords: 'extracorporeal liver support', 'acute liver failure', 'acute on chronic liver failure', 'albumin dialysis', 'artificial' and 'bioartificial'. Results and conclusions: ECLS has shown significant improvements in bilirubin and urea levels. Various forms of ECLS might also reduce mortality due to liver failure. However, many complications, such as hypotension, anemia, bleeding issues, sepsis, can be anticipated. There are a few barriers to mainstream use of ECLS, such as specific design requirements and high cost that reduce the overall utility of this modality in a small group of liver transplant candidates. Furthermore, a multidisciplinary team approach is required to supervise ECLS, a luxury only available at major academic hospitals. Some advancements for overcoming these barriers include investigation of new scaffolding systems. In order to expand the usage of ECLS, clinical trials focusing on a comparison of different modalities of ECLS with renal replacement therapy in patients with liver failure should be promoted.
Introduction: Acute liver failure is a cause of major mortality in the United States. Although the liver possesses regenerative capabilities, liver transplantation is the mainstay of treating acute liver failure. This modality is associated with many financial and logistic challenges. In this regard, Extracorporeal Liver Support (ECLS) might help in reducing mortality as well as bridge a patient to liver transplant. In some cases, the sequelae of liver failure such as hepatic encephalopathy and multi-organ failure can be postponed long enough for the native liver to self-recover function. With this rationale, we sought to describe the mechanism of various ECLS modalities, provide an overview of the current evidence regarding its use and to highlight future advancements that could overcome hindrances in its use. Methods: A scoping review was performed using PubMed and other databases from 1990 to 2020 with the keywords: 'extracorporeal liver support', 'acute liver failure', 'acute on chronic liver failure', 'albumin dialysis', 'artificial' and 'bioartificial'. Results and conclusions: ECLS has shown significant improvements in bilirubin and urea levels. Various forms of ECLS might also reduce mortality due to liver failure. However, many complications, such as hypotension, anemia, bleeding issues, sepsis, can be anticipated. There are a few barriers to mainstream use of ECLS, such as specific design requirements and high cost that reduce the overall utility of this modality in a small group of liver transplant candidates. Furthermore, a multidisciplinary team approach is required to supervise ECLS, a luxury only available at major academic hospitals. Some advancements for overcoming these barriers include investigation of new scaffolding systems. In order to expand the usage of ECLS, clinical trials focusing on a comparison of different modalities of ECLS with renal replacement therapy in patients with liver failure should be promoted.
Authors: A J Ellis; R D Hughes; J A Wendon; J Dunne; P G Langley; J H Kelly; G T Gislason; N L Sussman; R Williams Journal: Hepatology Date: 1996-12 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Achilles A Demetriou; Robert S Brown; Ronald W Busuttil; Jeffrey Fair; Brendan M McGuire; Philip Rosenthal; Jan Schulte Am Esch; Jan Lerut; Scott L Nyberg; Mauro Salizzoni; Elizabeth A Fagan; Bernard de Hemptinne; Christoph E Broelsch; Maurizio Muraca; Joan Manuel Salmeron; John M Rabkin; Herold J Metselaar; Daniel Pratt; Manuel De La Mata; Lawrence P McChesney; Gregory T Everson; Philip T Lavin; Anthony C Stevens; Zorina Pitkin; Barry A Solomon Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: A Kwong; W R Kim; J R Lake; J M Smith; D P Schladt; M A Skeans; S M Noreen; J Foutz; E Miller; J J Snyder; A K Israni; B L Kasiske Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: William A Bower; Matthew Johns; Harold S Margolis; Ian T Williams; Beth P Bell Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2007-06-29 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Vanessa Stadlbauer; Peter Krisper; Reingard Aigner; Bernd Haditsch; Aleksandra Jung; Carolin Lackner; Rudolf E Stauber Journal: Crit Care Date: 2006 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Christoph Sponholz; Katja Matthes; Dina Rupp; Wolf Backaus; Sebastian Klammt; Diana Karailieva; Astrid Bauschke; Utz Settmacher; Matthias Kohl; Mark G Clemens; Steffen Mitzner; Michael Bauer; Andreas Kortgen Journal: Crit Care Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 9.097