Literature DB >> 36262803

Study protocol: Randomized, open-label, non-inferiority clinical trial for evaluating the clinical and pathological response rates to neoadjuvant hormone therapy and chemotherapy in patients with luminal-subtype breast tumors.

Maria Carolina Gouveia1, Candice Amorim de Araújo Lima Santos1, Ariani Impieri Souza1.   

Abstract

Background: Despite neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) is being underused, it is an effective treatment for luminal tumors at a lower cost and with fewer side effects compared to those associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). The lack of robust comparative data between NHT and NCT is a factor that limits its use in clinical practice.
Methods: This study will be a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority clinical trial. Patients diagnosed with HER2-negative luminal-subtype breast cancer will be identified at the time of diagnosis. Menopausal patients randomized for NHT should receive anastrozole for at least six months. Premenopausal women should receive anastrozole associated with subcutaneous goserelin acetate every 12 weeks for at least six months. Patients randomized for NCT will receive a standard institutional regimen based on anthracyclines and taxanes. Sample size was calculated considering the CPS + EG as a method for evaluating response and prognosis, where a score <3 was defined as good. The non-inferiority margin for NHT was set at 15%. The study considered a power of 80%, a significance level of 5%, and an outcome proportion in each group of 69%, resulting in 118 patients in each group. We estimated at 10% of losses, resulting in a sample of 130 patients in each group.
Conclusion: The non-inferiority of NHT in relation to NCT will provide further evidence that replacing NCT with NHT is safe and effective in eligible patients, which is particularly relevant for populations with limited access to health services and for institutions with few available resources.
© 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Neoadjuvant hormone therapy; Preoperative endocrine prognostic index; Presurgical treatment; Radiotherapy

Year:  2022        PMID: 36262803      PMCID: PMC9574413          DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.101013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun        ISSN: 2451-8654


  34 in total

1.  Identification of Patients With Documented Pathologic Complete Response in the Breast After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Omission of Axillary Surgery.

Authors:  Audree B Tadros; Wei T Yang; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Gaiane M Rauch; Benjamin D Smith; Vicente Valero; Dalliah M Black; Anthony Lucci; Abigail S Caudle; Sarah M DeSnyder; Mediget Teshome; Carlos H Barcenas; Makesha Miggins; Beatriz E Adrada; Tanya Moseley; Rosa F Hwang; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Lessons in precision oncology from neoadjuvant endocrine therapy trials in ER+ breast cancer.

Authors:  Matthew J Ellis
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after primary chemotherapy in relation to hormone receptor status and other factors.

Authors:  Valentina Guarneri; Kristine Broglio; Shu-Wan Kau; Massimo Cristofanilli; Aman U Buzdar; Vicente Valero; Thomas Buchholz; Funda Meric; Lavinia Middleton; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18.

Authors:  N Wolmark; J Wang; E Mamounas; J Bryant; B Fisher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2001

5.  Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: Patient selection, treatment duration and surrogate endpoints.

Authors:  Belinda Yeo; Mitch Dowsett
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 6.  Primary chemotherapy for early and advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  G N Hortobagyi; A U Buzdar; E A Strom; F C Ames; S E Singletary
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  1995-03-23       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  Prognostic value of the Residual Cancer Burden index according to breast cancer subtype: Validation on a cohort of BC patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Hamy; Lauren Darrigues; Enora Laas; Diane De Croze; Lucian Topciu; Giang-Thanh Lam; Clemence Evrevin; Sonia Rozette; Lucie Laot; Florence Lerebours; Jean-Yves Pierga; Marie Osdoit; Matthieu Faron; Jean-Guillaume Feron; Marick Laé; Fabien Reyal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Outcome prediction for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer based on postneoadjuvant endocrine therapy tumor characteristics.

Authors:  Matthew J Ellis; Yu Tao; Jingqin Luo; Roger A'Hern; Dean B Evans; Ajay S Bhatnagar; Hilary A Chaudri Ross; Alexander von Kameke; William R Miller; Ian Smith; Wolfgang Eiermann; Mitch Dowsett
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: retrospective comparative evaluation of clinically axillary lymph node positive and negative patients, including those with axillary lymph node metastases confirmed by fine needle aspiration.

Authors:  Yue Yu; Ning Cui; Heng-Yu Li; Yan-Mei Wu; Lu Xu; Min Fang; Yuan Sheng
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 41.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.