Literature DB >> 36262788

Use of Uncertainty of Measurement for Traceability of Test Results and Setting up of own Quality Goal for Methods having Lower Stability- A Tertiary Care Hospital study.

Ranjna Chawla1, Manju Subberwal2, Ankush Singhal3.   

Abstract

Uncertainty of measurement (UM) provides a quantitative estimate for traceability of test results. The Nordtest guide was applied for calculating UM of 26 analytes. For this, internal and external quality control data from July 2019 to April 2020 was used. UM of test results were compared to %TEa values of CLIA '2019, RiliBÄK, and Ricos. It was observed that UM for all analytes were below %TEa values of RiliBÄK. UM value of Albumin, Calcium and Sodium could not meet CLIA '2019 and Ricos guidelines. For results of Albumin, Calcium and Sodium to be traceable, more frequent quality control protocols resulted in decrease in bias. Quality goals were set for these three parameters. This helped in reduction of quality control cycles and optimum utilization of resources.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Association of Clinical Biochemists of India 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CLIA; Ricos; RiliBÄK; Total allowable error (TEa); Uncertainty of measurement (UM)

Year:  2021        PMID: 36262788      PMCID: PMC9573843          DOI: 10.1007/s12291-021-01016-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0970-1915


  11 in total

1.  Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress.

Authors:  C Ricós; V Alvarez; F Cava; J V García-Lario; A Hernández; C V Jiménez; J Minchinela; C Perich; M Simón
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.713

2.  The quality of veterinary in-clinic and reference laboratory biochemical testing.

Authors:  Mark Rishniw; Paul D Pion; Tammy Maher
Journal:  Vet Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 1.180

3.  Analytical quality--what should we be aiming for?

Authors:  Ken Sikaris
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2008-08

4.  Using MOOCs for teaching analytical chemistry: experience at University of Tartu.

Authors:  Ivo Leito; Irja Helm; Lauri Jalukse
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Uncertainty in measurement and total error - are they so incompatible?

Authors:  Ian Farrance; Tony Badrick; Kenneth A Sikaris
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Routine internal- and external-quality control data in clinical laboratories for estimating measurement and diagnostic uncertainty using GUM principles.

Authors:  Bertil Magnusson; Haakan Ossowicki; Olaf Rienitz; Elvar Theodorsson
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 1.713

7.  Quality specifications of routine clinical chemistry methods based on sigma metrics in performance evaluation.

Authors:  Jun Xia; Su-Feng Chen; Fei Xu; Yong-Lie Zhou
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Application of sigma metrics for the assessment of quality control in clinical chemistry laboratory in Ghana: A pilot study.

Authors:  Justice Afrifa; Seth A Gyekye; William K B A Owiredu; Richard K D Ephraim; Samuel Essien-Baidoo; Samuel Amoah; David L Simpong; Aaron R Arthur
Journal:  Niger Med J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

9.  Practical application of Six Sigma management in analytical biochemistry processes in clinical settings.

Authors:  Bingfei Zhou; Yi Wu; Hanlin He; Cunyan Li; Liming Tan; Youde Cao
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 10.  The top-down approach to measurement uncertainty: which formula should we use in laboratory medicine?

Authors:  Flávia Martinello; Nada Snoj; Milan Skitek; Aleš Jerin
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.