| Literature DB >> 36262650 |
Kainat Amin Bora1, Saud Hashmi1,2, Faisal Zulfiqar3, Zainul Abideen4, Haibat Ali5, Zamin Shaheed Siddiqui6, Kadambot H M Siddique7.
Abstract
The ever-increasing demand for agricultural food products, medicine, and other commercial sectors requires new technologies for agricultural practices and promoting the optimum utilization of natural resources. The application of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) enhance the biomass production and yield of food crop while resisting harmful environmental stresses. Bio-mediated synthesis of ENMs are time-efficient, low-cost, environmentally friendly, green technology. The precedence of using a bio-mediated route over conventional precursors for ENM synthesis is non-toxic and readily available. It possesses many active agents that can facilitate the reduction and stabilization processes during nanoparticle formation. This review presents recent developments in bio-mediated ENMs and green synthesis techniques using plants, algae, fungi, and bacteria, including significant contributions to identifying major ENM applications in agriculture with potential impacts on sustainability, such as the role of different ENMs in agriculture and their impact on different plant species. The review also covers the advantages and disadvantages of different ENMs and potential future research in this field.Entities:
Keywords: agriculture; bio-mediated; engineered nanomaterials (ENMs); plant growth; seed germination; sustainable
Year: 2022 PMID: 36262650 PMCID: PMC9574372 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.999505
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Figure 1Biosynthesis routes of engineered nonmaterial by different organisms.
Figure 2Green synthesis scheme of engineered nano materials from various resources.
Figure 3Color changes in the plant extract of Salvia spinosa after adding AgNO3 solution (Pirtarighat et al., 2019). (A) Plant leaves soaked in water. (B) Plant extract without AgNO3. (C) Plant extract with the addition of AgNO3. Copyright 2018.
Figure 4TEM images of copper oxide ENMs synthesized by lavender and green tea leaf powders using the solid-state method (Khaldari et al., 2021). Copyright 2021.
Applications of Engineered Nano materials in seed germination.
| Engineered Nanomaterials(ENMs) | Plants | Size (nm) | Shape | Antimicrobial applications | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag-NP | 3–20 | Spherical | ( | ||
| 5.13 | Spherical/ovl | ( | |||
| 34 | Spherical | ( | |||
| 10 ± 2 (synthesized from roots); 5 ± 1.5 (synthesized from stems) | Spherical | – | ( | ||
| 200–300 | Spherical | ( | |||
| Zn-NP | Chamomile ( | 41.0 ± 2.0 ( | Cubic | ( | |
| 21 | Spherical | ( | |||
| 26.57 | Spherical and hexagonal | ( | |||
| 8.35 | Spherical | ( | |||
| 19.57 ± 1.56 | Non-spherical | Pneumococci strains | ( | ||
| 100–150 | Spherical | ( | |||
| 18 | Oval and spherical | ( | |||
| ( | |||||
| Cu-NP | ( | ||||
| 13.07 | Rice-grain-shaped | ( | |||
| Walnut leaf extract | 80 | Spherical and crystalline | ( | ||
| 7–11 | Composite flakes | Candida albicans and the bacteria Klebsiella pneumoniae | ( | ||
| 70 | Spherical | ( | |||
| Herbal tea ( | 20–35 | Spherical | Catalytic activity | ( | |
| 34.76 | Spherical, hexagonal, triangular, cylindrical and irregularly shaped | ( | |||
| 5–10 | Spherical | ( | |||
| Fe-NP | 70 | Face-centered cubic | Synthesis of 1,3-diolein | ( | |
| 21.59 | Non-uniform | ( | |||
| Green tea | 50–80 | Spherical | Removal of hexavalent chromium | ( | |
| 78–80 | Spherical | ( | |||
| Peanut skin extract | 10.6 | Spherical | Chromium removal | ( | |
| 138–475 | Spherical | ( |
Figure 5TEM image of copper ENMs (Engineered Nanomaterials) synthesized from algal extract of Bifurcaria bifurcata (Abboud et al., 2014). Copyright 2013.
Examples of synthesis of engineered nanomaterials using algae/bacteria/yeast.
| Nanoparticle (NP) | Plant species | Size (nm) | Shape | Applications | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag-NP | 49.58–86.37 | Spherical, triangular, rectangular, polyhedral, and hexagonal | – | ( | |
| 26.5 | Cubic | ( | |||
| 5–25 | Face-centered cubic | ( | |||
| 40–100 | Face-centered cubic | ( | |||
| 5–25 | Face-centered cubic | ( | |||
| 3.30–17.97 | Quasi-spherical | ( | |||
| 20.2-94.9 | Spherical | ( | |||
| Pd-NP | 50–150 | Spherical | Electrocatalytic activities toward hydrogen peroxide | ( | |
| 10–20 | Spherical | Tested as adsorbent | ( | ||
| Cu-NP | 2–50 | Spherical | ( | ||
| <40 | Spherical | ( | |||
| Zn-NP | 20 ± 2.2 | Hexagonal | Photodegradation of Dibenzothiophene (DBT) aqueous solution | ( | |
| 12–17 | Spherical and round | Antibacterial, antifungal, and anticancer applications | ( |
Figure 6Application of engineered nanomaterials in agricultural productivity.
Applications of Engineered Nano materials in seed germination.
| Nanoparticle (NP) | Plant Species | Parameters analyzed | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ag-NP | Seed germination, seedling growth, and chlorophyll studies | ( | |
| Lentil seeds | Germination index, root and shoot lengths, and fresh and dry weights | ( | |
| Seedling weight and length and germination rate | ( | ||
| Fenugreek seeds | Germination rate, root and shoot length, fresh and dry mass | ( | |
| Zn-NP | Lettuce seeds | Germination rate and biomass | ( |
| Seed germination and seedling growth | ( | ||
| Peanut seeds | Seed germination rate, seedling vigor, plant growth rate, and chlorophyll content | ( | |
| Onion | Number of seeded fruits and seed yield per umbel | ( | |
| Chickpea seedlings | Shoot dry weight | ( | |
| Si-NP | Seed germination, early growth traits, percent and rate of germination, root and shoot lengths, seedling fresh and dry weights, and seed vigor index | ( | |
| Seed germination, vigor index, and biomass | ( | ||
| Germination and seed growth | ( | ||
| Germination rate and seed growth | ( | ||
| Carbon nanotubes | Germination percentage and rate, seedling length, seedling fresh and dry weights, and average germination time | ( | |
| Germination rate, seedling length, and seedling fresh and dry weights | ( | ||
| Germination rate, mean germination time, root and shoot lengths, and plant fresh and dry weights | ( | ||
| Tomato | Germination rate, seedling growth | ( |
Figure 7Soybean plant growth 15 weeks after germination under different fertilizer treatments (left to right) Hydroxyapatite ENMs (Engineered Nanomaterials), fertilizer plus normal phosphorous, fertilizer without phosphorous, and water (Liu and Lal, 2014). Copyright 2014.
Application of engineered nano materials to enhance plant growth and other eco- physiological parameters. .
| Nanoparticle (NP) | Plant species | Parameters analyzed | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zn-NP | Plant growth parameters, photosynthesis, antioxidant activity under cadmium stress | ( | |
| Translocation and deposition of ENMs and their effect on growth | ( | ||
| Safflower | Change in antioxidant enzyme concentrations | ( | |
| Fenugreek ( | Plant growth parameters, including shoot length and dry weight, leaf quantity, nutrient percentage, chlorophyll content, and yield | ( | |
| Root and shoot growth | ( | ||
| Percentage of nutrients and antioxidant enzymes | ( | ||
| Number of somatic embryos | ( | ||
| Ti-NP | Coriander | Plant height, fruit yield, and branch number | ( |
| Canola ( | Seed germination and seedling vigor | ( | |
| Seedling germination rate, gas exchange rate and root length | ( | ||
| Si-NP | Marigold ( | Plant height, branch number, and root length | ( |
| Plant growth parameters, including height, stem diameter, plant dry weight, leaf quantity and surface area | ( | ||
| Basil ( | Chlorophyll and plant biomass | ( | |
| Maize ( | Enzyme characteristics of soil, soil physical attributes, nutrient intake, and crop yield | ( |
Figure 8Effect of Se nano-fertilizers on (A) eggplant (B) cucumber (C) tomato, and (D) chili pepper (Gudkov et al., 2020). Copyright 2020.
Application of engineered nano-materials to enhance fruit yield and control disease in plants.
| Nanoparticle (NP) | Plant species | Parameters | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu-NP | Watermelon | Root and shoot length, fruit quantity, and leaf area | ( |
| Tomato ( | Fruit quantity and quality and antioxidant activity | ( | |
| Ti-NP | Tomato | ( | |
| Tomato | Plant height, root length, seed germination, flower quantity, and fruit yield | ( | |
| Effect against | ( | ||
| Se-NP | Eggplant, cucumber, tomato, chili pepper | Effect as fertilizer (see | ( |
| Strawberry ( | Salinity tolerance, H2O2 content | ( | |
| Pomegranate | Level of photosynthetic pigments, nutrient status, physical parameters (fruit cracking), phenolic content, osmolytes, antioxidant enzymes, abscisic acid, lipid peroxidation, and H2O2 content | ( | |
| Bitter melon ( | Nutrient content, leaf composition; effect on salt and temperature stresses | ( | |
| Faba bean | Antifungal activity against | ( | |
| C-NP | Bitter melon ( | Number of produced flowers, time of fructifying | ( |
Limitation and pitfalls of using engineered nanomaterials on plants.
| Engineered nanomaterials | Concentration | Plant species | Adverse effects | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) and oxidized-MWCNT | 46×10–3 mg mL–1 | Mustard ( | Reduced germination rate and plant growth | ( |
| Carboxy fullerenes (C70(C(COOH)2)2−4) | 0−0.144 mg mL–1 | Tobacco | Reduced plant growth | ( |
| Water-soluble graphene | 500–2000 mg L–1 | cabbage ( | Reduced growth (Plant height and biomass) | ( |
| Single-bilayer graphene oxide | 0, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600 mg L−1 | Beans ( | Reduced plant growth and enzymatic activity | ( |
| Coated (humic acid) and uncoated zinc oxide (ZnO) ENMs | 0, 10, 100, 1000 mg kg–1 soil | Cucumber plants | Reduced plant growth (root and shoot biomass) | ( |
| Core-shell iron/iron oxide (Fe/Fe3O4) and copper-/copper oxide (Cu/CuO) ENMs | 10, 20 mg L–1 | Lettuce ( | Decreased plant growth, water potential, dry weight, and the concentration of several nutrients | ( |
| Cu/CuO and Zn/ZnO ENMs | 0, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000 mg L–1 | Cucumber | Decrease seedling biomass at higher nanoparticle concentrations | ( |
| Cu/CuO ENMs | 0, 20, 80 mg kg–1 | Cilantro ( | Reduced germination, water content, and relative chlorophyll content | ( |
| Cerium oxide (CeO2) and ZnO ENMs | 400–800 mg kg–1 | Cucumber ( | Decreased non-reducing sugars, affecting albumin and prolamin fractions | ( |
| CuO ENMs | 0, 50, 100, 200, 400, 500 mg L–1 | Green pea ( | Reduced plant growth (shoot and root lengths) | ( |
| Titanium dioxide (TiO2) (rutile) ENMs | 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 4.0, 6.0% | Spinach ( | Reduced plant growth rate and crop yield | ( |
| CuO, aluminum oxide (Al2O3), and TiO2 ENMs | 0, 20, 200, 2000 μg mL−1 | Onion ( | Reduced root length | ( |
| Fe₃O₄ and TiO₂ ENMs | (0, 100, 200 mg kg–1 soil) | Soybean ( | Decreased plant growth | ( |
| Titanium dioxide (TiO₂) ENMs | 0, 10, 50, 100, 200, 1000, 2000 mg L–1 | Growth inhibited above 200 mg L–1 | ( | |
| Silver (Ag) and TiO2 ENMs | 10, 20, 40 ppm Ag-NP and 31, 50, 100 ppm TiO2-NP | Decreased growth rate | ( |