Literature DB >> 36262517

TC-325 hemostatic powder in the management of upper gastrointestinal malignant bleeding: a randomized controlled trial.

Bruno Costa Martins1, Andressa Abnader Machado1, Rodrigo Corsato Scomparin1, Gustavo Andrade Paulo1, Adriana Safatle-Ribeiro1, Sebastian Naschold Geiger1, Luciano Lenz1, Marcelo Simas Lima1, Caterina Pennacchi1, Ulysses Ribeiro2, Alan N Barkun3,4, Fauze Maluf-Filho1.   

Abstract

Background and study aims  Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) from malignancy is associated with high rebleeding and mortality rates. Recently, TC-325 powder has shown promising results in the treatment of UGIB, including malignant bleeding. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of TC-325 versus best clinical management. Patients and methods  From August 2016 to February 2020, all patients with evidence of UGIB from malignancy were randomized to receive TC-325 therapy or control group, in which endoscopic treatment was not mandatory. Exclusion criteria were hemoglobin drop without overt bleeding and UGIB from non-tumor origin. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30-day rebleeding, blood transfusion and length of hospital stay. Results  Sixty-two patients were randomized, three were excluded and 59 were included in the final analysis (TC-325 group = 28; control = 31). Groups were similar at baseline. Active bleeding was observed in 22 patients in the TC-325 group and 19 in the control group ( P  = 0.15). Successful initial hemostasis with TC-325 was achieved in all cases. Additional therapy (radiotherapy, surgery or arterial embolization) was equally performed in both groups (42.9 % vs 58.1 %; P  = 0.243). There were no differences in 30-day mortality (28.6 % vs. 19.4 %, P  = 0.406) or 30-day rebleeding rates (32.1 % vs. 19.4 %, P  = 0.26). Logistic regression identified no significant predictors of rebleeding. Age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 3 to 4 and AIMS65 score > 1 predicted greater mortality. Conclusions  TC-325 was effective in achieving immediate hemostasis in malignant gastrointestinal bleeding but did not reduce 30-day mortality, 30-day rebleeding, blood transfusion or length of hospital stay. Age, ECOG 3-4, and AIMS65 > 1 were predictive factors of mortality. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36262517      PMCID: PMC9576337          DOI: 10.1055/a-1906-4769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endosc Int Open        ISSN: 2196-9736


  15 in total

Review 1.  Hemostatic Powders in Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yen-I Chen; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2015-04-18

Review 2.  Analysis of failures and complications of neodymium: YAG laser photocoagulation in gastrointestinal tract tumors. A retrospective survey of 18 years' experience.

Authors:  E M Mathus-Vliegen; G N Tytgat
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Argon plasma coagulation for the endoscopic treatment of gastrointestinal tumor bleeding: A retrospective comparison with a non-treated historical cohort.

Authors:  Bruno Costa Martins; Stephanie Wodak; Carla C Gusmon; Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro; Fabio Shiguehissa Kawaguti; Elisa Ryoka Baba; Caterina Mp Pennacchi; Marcelo Simas Lima; Ulysses Ribeiro; Fauze Maluf-Filho
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Efficacy of Hemospray in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hemant Mutneja; Abhishek Bhurwal; Andrew Go; Gurpartap Singh Sidhu; Shilpa Arora; Bashar M Attar
Journal:  J Gastrointestin Liver Dis       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 2.008

5.  Etiology, endoscopic management and mortality of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Fauze Maluf-Filho; Bruno Costa Martins; Marcelo Simas de Lima; Daniel Valdivia Leonardo; Felipe Alves Retes; Fábio Shiguehissa Kawaguti; Cezar Fabiano Manabu Sato; Fábio Yuji Hondo; Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro; Ulysses Ribeiro
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  Severe upper gastrointestinal tumor bleeding: endoscopic findings, treatment, and outcome.

Authors:  T J Savides; D M Jensen; J Cohen; G M Randall; T O Kovacs; E Pelayo; S Cheng; M E Jensen; H Y Hsieh
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Efficacy of Hemospray in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Aziz; Simcha Weissman; Tej I Mehta; Shafae Hassan; Zubair Khan; Rawish Fatima; Yuriy Tsirlin; Ammar Hassan; Michael Sciarra; Ali Nawras; Amit Rastogi
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01-20

8.  Efficacy of a novel hemostatic adhesive powder in patients with upper gastrointestinal tumor bleeding.

Authors:  Jongbeom Shin; Boram Cha; Jin-Seok Park; Weonjin Ko; Kye Sook Kwon; Jin-Woo Lee; Hyung Kil Kim; Yong Woon Shin
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  The efficacy of Hemospray in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding from tumor.

Authors:  Rapat Pittayanon; Piyapan Prueksapanich; Rungsun Rerknimitr
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-08-31

10.  Hemostatic powder application for control of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with gastric malignancy.

Authors:  Yeong Jin Kim; Jun Chul Park; Eun Hye Kim; Sung Kwan Shin; Sang Kil Lee; Young Chan Lee
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.