Literature DB >> 36261839

Association of stress hyperglycemia ratio and in-hospital mortality in patients with coronary artery disease: insights from a large cohort study.

Wei Xu1, Qirui Song2, Xiang Wang3,4, Zinan Zhao5, Xuyang Meng3,4, Chenxi Xia3, Yibo Xie6, Chenguang Yang3, Ying Guo3, Yatong Zhang7, Fang Wang8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stress hyperglycemia is strongly associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Recently, the stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) has been proposed to represent relative hyperglycemia. Studies regarding the relationship between SHR and mortality in coronary artery disease (CAD) are limited. This study aimed to clarify the association between SHR and in-hospital mortality in patients with CAD.
METHODS: A total of 19,929 patients with CAD who were hospitalized in Beijing Hospital were enrolled in this study. Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min, cancer, or missing blood glucose/HbA1c data were excluded; therefore, 8,196 patients were included in the final analysis. The patients were divided into three groups based on tertiles of SHR: T1 group (SHR < 0.725, n = 2,732), T2 group (0.725 ≤ SHR < 0.832, n = 2,730), and T3 group (SHR ≥ 0.832, n = 2,734). The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 0.91% (n = 74). After adjusting for covariates, SHR was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with CAD [odds ratio (OR) = 17.038; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 9.668-30.027; P < 0.001], and the T3 group had a higher risk of in-hospital mortality (OR = 4.901; 95% CI = 2.583-9.297; P < 0.001) compared with T1 group. In the subgroup analysis, the T3 group had an increased risk of mortality among patients with pre-diabetes mellitus (pre-DM) (OR = 9.670; 95% CI = 1.886-49.571; P = 0.007) and diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR = 5.023; 95% CI = 2.371-10.640; P < 0.001) after adjustments for covariates. The relationship between SHR and in-hospital mortality among patients with ACS and chronic coronary syndrome was consistent with the main finding. SHR and in-hospital mortality exhibited a dose-response relationship, and the risk of in-hospital mortality increased when the SHR index was above 1.20. Moreover, the area under the curve of SHR for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with CAD was 0.741.
CONCLUSION: SHR is significantly associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with CAD. SHR may be an effective predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with CAD, especially for those with pre-DM and DM.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery disease; Diabetes; Mortality; Stress hyperglycemia; Stress hyperglycemia ratio

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36261839      PMCID: PMC9580448          DOI: 10.1186/s12933-022-01645-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol        ISSN: 1475-2840            Impact factor:   8.949


  30 in total

1.  Acute hyperglycemia is associated with adverse outcome after acute myocardial infarction in the coronary intervention era.

Authors:  Masaharu Ishihara; Sunao Kojima; Tomohiro Sakamoto; Yujiro Asada; Chuwa Tei; Kazuo Kimura; Shunichi Miyazaki; Masahiro Sonoda; Kazufumi Tsuchihashi; Masakazu Yamagishi; Yoshihiko Ikeda; Mutsunori Shirai; Hisatoyo Hiraoka; Takeshi Inoue; Fumio Saito; Hisao Ogawa
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Relative Hyperglycemia, a Marker of Critical Illness: Introducing the Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio.

Authors:  Gregory W Roberts; Stephen J Quinn; Nyoli Valentine; Tariq Alhawassi; Hazel O'Dea; Stephen N Stranks; Morton G Burt; Matthew P Doogue
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Stress hyperglycaemia and increased risk of death after myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes: a systematic overview.

Authors:  S E Capes; D Hunt; K Malmberg; H C Gerstein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Prognostic Value of the Acute-to-Chronic Glycemic Ratio at Admission in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Giancarlo Marenzi; Nicola Cosentino; Valentina Milazzo; Monica De Metrio; Milena Cecere; Susanna Mosca; Mara Rubino; Jeness Campodonico; Marco Moltrasio; Ivana Marana; Marco Grazi; Gianfranco Lauri; Alice Bonomi; Fabrizio Veglia; Roberto Manfrini; Antonio L Bartorelli
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Epidemiology and the Magnitude of Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  U Ralapanawa; R Sivakanesan
Journal:  J Epidemiol Glob Health       Date:  2021-01-07

6.  The Impact of the Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio on Short-term and Long-term Poor Prognosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insight From a Large Cohort Study in Asia.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Yitian Zheng; Chen Li; Jun Gao; Xiangbin Meng; Kuo Zhang; Wenyao Wang; Chunli Shao; Yi-Da Tang
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Predictive value of the stress hyperglycemia ratio in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insights from a multi-center observational study.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Yan-Min Yang; Jun Zhu; Shuang Wu; Juan Wang; Han Zhang; Xing-Hui Shao
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 9.951

8.  International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes: response to the International Expert Committee.

Authors:  Eric S Kilpatrick; Zachary T Bloomgarden; Paul Z Zimmet
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 9.  Stress hyperglycemia: an essential survival response!

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Impact of admission hyperglycemia on short and long-term prognosis in acute myocardial infarction: MINOCA versus MIOCA.

Authors:  Pasquale Paolisso; Alberto Foà; Luca Bergamaschi; Francesco Angeli; Michele Fabrizio; Francesco Donati; Sebastiano Toniolo; Chiara Chiti; Andrea Rinaldi; Andrea Stefanizzi; Matteo Armillotta; Angelo Sansonetti; Ilenia Magnani; Gianmarco Iannopollo; Paola Rucci; Gianni Casella; Nazzareno Galiè; Carmine Pizzi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 9.951

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.