Literature DB >> 36261827

A named GP increases self-reported access to health care services.

Emmi Lautamatti1,2, Kari Mattila3, Sakari Suominen4,5, Lauri Sillanmäki6,7, Markku Sumanen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuity of care strengthens health promotion and decreases mortality, although the mechanisms of these effects are still unclear. In recent decades, continuity of care and accessibility of health care services have both decreased in Finland.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate whether a named and assigned GP representing continuity of care is associated with the use of primary and hospital health care services and to create knowledge on the state of continuity of care in a changing health care system in Finland.
METHODS: The data are part of the Health and Social Support (HeSSup) mail survey based on a random Finnish working age population sample of 64,797 individuals drawn in 1998 and follow-up surveys in 2003 and 2012. The response rate in 1998 was 40% (n = 25,898). Continuity of care was derived from the 2003 and 2012 data sets, other variables from the 2012 survey (n = 11,924). The principal outcome variables were primary health care and hospital service use reported by participants. The association of the explanatory variables (gender, age, education, reported chronic diseases, health status, smoking, obesity, NYHA class of any functional limitation, depressive mood and continuity of care) with the outcome variables was analysed by binomial logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: A named and assigned GP was independently and significantly associated with more frequent use of primary and hospital care in the adjusted logistic regression analysis (ORs 1.53 (95% CI 1.35-1.72) and 1.19 (95% CI 1.08-1.32), p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: A named GPs is associated with an increased use of primary care and hospital services. A named GP assures access to health care services especially to the chronically ill population. The results depict the state of continuity of care in Finland. All benefits of continuity of care are not enabled although it still assures treatment of population in the most vulnerable position.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accessibility; Continuity of care; Health care; Hospital care; Named GP; Primary care; Use of health care services

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36261827      PMCID: PMC9580200          DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08660-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1472-6963            Impact factor:   2.908


  31 in total

Review 1.  Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review.

Authors:  Jeannie L Haggerty; Robert J Reid; George K Freeman; Barbara H Starfield; Carol E Adair; Rachael McKendry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-22

2.  Continuity of care matters.

Authors:  Bruce Guthrie; John W Saultz; George K Freeman; Jeannie L Haggerty
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-08-07

3.  Continuity of care: is it cost effective?

Authors:  M Raddish; S D Horn; P D Sharkey
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 4.  Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: a critical review.

Authors:  John W Saultz; Waleed Albedaiwi
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Identifying Specific Combinations of Multimorbidity that Contribute to Health Care Resource Utilization: An Analytic Approach.

Authors:  Nicholas K Schiltz; David F Warner; Jiayang Sun; Paul M Bakaki; Avi Dor; Charles W Given; Kurt C Stange; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Association of weekend continuity of care with hospital length of stay.

Authors:  Saul Blecker; Daniel Shine; Naeun Park; Keith Goldfeld; R Scott Braithwaite; Martha J Radford; Marc N Gourevitch
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.038

7.  Expanding choice of primary care in Finland: much debate but little change so far.

Authors:  Liina-Kaisa Tynkkynen; Miisa Chydenius; Anna Saloranta; Ilmo Keskimäki
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Non-response in a nationwide follow-up postal survey in Finland: a register-based mortality analysis of respondents and non-respondents of the Health and Social Support (HeSSup) Study.

Authors:  Sakari Suominen; Karoliina Koskenvuo; Lauri Sillanmäki; Jussi Vahtera; Katariina Korkeila; Mika Kivimäki; Kari J Mattila; Pekka Virtanen; Markku Sumanen; Päivi Rautava; Markku Koskenvuo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The epidemiology of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anna Cassell; Duncan Edwards; Amelia Harshfield; Kirsty Rhodes; James Brimicombe; Rupert Payne; Simon Griffin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Continuity in general practice as predictor of mortality, acute hospitalisation, and use of out-of-hours care: a registry-based observational study in Norway.

Authors:  Hogne Sandvik; Øystein Hetlevik; Jesper Blinkenberg; Steinar Hunskaar
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 6.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.