Jaffer Okiring1,2, Samuel Gonahasa3, Martha Nassali3, Jane F Namuganga3, Irene Bagala3, Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi3,4, Jimmy Opigo4, Isaiah Nabende3, Joanita Nangendo5, Jane Kabami5,3, Isaac Ssewanyana3, Steven M Kiwuwa6, Joaniter I Nankabirwa5,3, Grant Dorsey7, Jessica Briggs7, Moses R Kamya3,8, Sarah G Staedke3,9. 1. Clinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda. okjaffer@gmail.com. 2. Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda. okjaffer@gmail.com. 3. Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, PO Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda. 4. National Malaria Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda. 5. Clinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda. 6. Department of Child Health and Development Centre, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda. 7. Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA. 8. Department of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. 9. Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2020-2021, long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) were distributed nationwide in Uganda during the COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 12 districts to evaluate the impact of the campaign 1-5 months after LLIN distribution. METHODS: During April-May 2021, households were randomly selected from target areas (1-7 villages) surrounding 12 government-run health facilities established as Malaria Reference Centres; at least 50 households were enrolled per cluster. Outcomes included household ownership of LLINs distributed through the universal coverage campaign (UCC) (at least one UCC LLIN), adequate coverage of UCC LLINs (at least one UCC LLIN per 2 residents), and use of LLINs (resident slept under a LLIN the previous night). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify household- and individual-level factors associated with outcomes, controlling for clustering around health facilities. RESULTS: In total, 634 households, with 3342 residents and 1631 bed-nets, were included. Most households (93.4%) owned at least 1 UCC LLIN, but only 56.8% were adequately covered by UCC LLINs. In an adjusted analysis, the factor most strongly associated with adequate coverage by UCC LLINs was fewer household residents (1-4 vs 7-14; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 12.96, 95% CI 4.76-35.26, p < 0.001; 5-6 vs 7-14 residents; aOR 2.99, 95% CI 1.21-7.42, p = 0.018). Of the 3166 residents of households that owned at least one UCC LLIN, only 1684 (53.2%) lived in adequately covered households; 89.9% of these used an LLIN the previous night, compared to 1034 (69.8%) of 1482 residents living in inadequately covered households. In an adjusted analysis, restricted to residents of inadequately covered households, LLIN use was higher in children under-five than those aged 5-15 years (aOR 3.04, 95% CI 2.08-4.46, p < 0.001), and higher in household heads than distantly-related residents (aOR 3.94, 95% CI 2.38-6.51, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Uganda's 2021-21 campaign was successful, despite the COVID-19 pandemic. In future campaigns, strategies should be adopted to ensure high LLIN coverage, particularly for larger households. A better understanding of the drivers of LLIN use within households is needed to guide future interventions, educational messages, and behaviour change communication strategies; school-aged children and distantly-related residents appear vulnerable and could be targeted.
BACKGROUND: In 2020-2021, long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) were distributed nationwide in Uganda during the COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 12 districts to evaluate the impact of the campaign 1-5 months after LLIN distribution. METHODS: During April-May 2021, households were randomly selected from target areas (1-7 villages) surrounding 12 government-run health facilities established as Malaria Reference Centres; at least 50 households were enrolled per cluster. Outcomes included household ownership of LLINs distributed through the universal coverage campaign (UCC) (at least one UCC LLIN), adequate coverage of UCC LLINs (at least one UCC LLIN per 2 residents), and use of LLINs (resident slept under a LLIN the previous night). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify household- and individual-level factors associated with outcomes, controlling for clustering around health facilities. RESULTS: In total, 634 households, with 3342 residents and 1631 bed-nets, were included. Most households (93.4%) owned at least 1 UCC LLIN, but only 56.8% were adequately covered by UCC LLINs. In an adjusted analysis, the factor most strongly associated with adequate coverage by UCC LLINs was fewer household residents (1-4 vs 7-14; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 12.96, 95% CI 4.76-35.26, p < 0.001; 5-6 vs 7-14 residents; aOR 2.99, 95% CI 1.21-7.42, p = 0.018). Of the 3166 residents of households that owned at least one UCC LLIN, only 1684 (53.2%) lived in adequately covered households; 89.9% of these used an LLIN the previous night, compared to 1034 (69.8%) of 1482 residents living in inadequately covered households. In an adjusted analysis, restricted to residents of inadequately covered households, LLIN use was higher in children under-five than those aged 5-15 years (aOR 3.04, 95% CI 2.08-4.46, p < 0.001), and higher in household heads than distantly-related residents (aOR 3.94, 95% CI 2.38-6.51, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Uganda's 2021-21 campaign was successful, despite the COVID-19 pandemic. In future campaigns, strategies should be adopted to ensure high LLIN coverage, particularly for larger households. A better understanding of the drivers of LLIN use within households is needed to guide future interventions, educational messages, and behaviour change communication strategies; school-aged children and distantly-related residents appear vulnerable and could be targeted.
Authors: Joaniter Nankabirwa; Simon J Brooker; Sian E Clarke; Deepika Fernando; Caroline W Gitonga; David Schellenberg; Brian Greenwood Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Lucy S Tusting; Christian Bottomley; Harry Gibson; Immo Kleinschmidt; Andrew J Tatem; Steve W Lindsay; Peter W Gething Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Sarah G Staedke; Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi; Andrea M Rehman; Simon P Kigozi; Samuel Gonahasa; Jaffer Okiring; Steve W Lindsay; Moses R Kamya; Clare I R Chandler; Grant Dorsey; Chris Drakeley Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Andrea M Rehman; Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi; Samuel Gonahasa; Jaffer Okiring; Simon P Kigozi; Clare I R Chandler; Chris Drakeley; Grant Dorsey; Moses R Kamya; Sarah G Staedke Journal: Malar J Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Sarah G Staedke; Samuel Gonahasa; Grant Dorsey; Moses R Kamya; Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi; Amy Lynd; Agaba Katureebe; Mary Kyohere; Peter Mutungi; Simon P Kigozi; Jimmy Opigo; Janet Hemingway; Martin J Donnelly Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-04-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Chiara Andolina; John C Rek; Jessica Briggs; Joseph Okoth; Alex Musiime; Jordache Ramjith; Noam Teyssier; Melissa Conrad; Joaniter I Nankabirwa; Kjerstin Lanke; Isabel Rodriguez-Barraquer; Lisette Meerstein-Kessel; Emmanuel Arinaitwe; Peter Olwoch; Philip J Rosenthal; Moses R Kamya; Grant Dorsey; Bryan Greenhouse; Chris Drakeley; Sarah G Staedke; Teun Bousema Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 71.421