Literature DB >> 36261467

Sizes of atmospheric particulate matters determine the outcomes of their interactions with rainfall processes.

Relotilwe Maboa1, Kowiyou Yessoufou2, Solomon Tesfamichael1, Yegnanew A Shiferaw3.   

Abstract

Environmental sustainability remains at risk, given the coupled trends of economic development with air pollution. The risk is even greater in the water-stressed world, given the potential suppression effects of air pollutants on rain formation. Here, since these suppression effects remain debated, we tested the hypothesis that air pollutants suppress rainfall in the water-stressed South Africa. This was done by fitting generalized linear models to a 21-year historical dataset of rainfall and air pollutants. We found that some gaseous pollutants and PM10 show a significant negative correlation with rainfall, perhaps due to the temperature inversion they cause, which might prevent the upward rise of humid air and convective clouds to grow high enough to produce rain. Surprisingly, as opposed to PM10, we found a rather positive significant effect of PM2.5. Altogether, our study supports the hypothesis of rain prevention by pollutants but provides some nuances that are dependent on the size of air particle matters. To achieve environmental sustainability while growing the economy, we can only rely on emission purification technologies to strike this trade-off.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36261467      PMCID: PMC9581900          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22558-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  9 in total

1.  Suppression of rain and snow by urban and industrial air pollution

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Climate change and changes in global precipitation patterns: what do we know?

Authors:  Mohammed H I Dore
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Effects of gaseous sulphuric acid on diesel exhaust nanoparticle formation and characteristics.

Authors:  Topi Rönkkö; Tero Lähde; Juha Heikkilä; Liisa Pirjola; Ulrike Bauschke; Frank Arnold; Hans Schlager; Dieter Rothe; Jaakko Yli-Ojanperä; Jorma Keskinen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Emissions of sulfur trioxide from coal-fired power plants.

Authors:  R K Srivastava; C A Miller; C Erickson; R Jambhekar
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  Water scarcity assessments in the past, present and future.

Authors:  Junguo Liu; Hong Yang; Simon N Gosling; Matti Kummu; Martina Flörke; Stephan Pfister; Naota Hanasaki; Yoshihide Wada; Xinxin Zhang; Chunmiao Zheng; Joseph Alcamo; Taikan Oki
Journal:  Earths Future       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 7.495

6.  Diversity and determinants of traditional water conservation technologies in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa.

Authors:  Buntu Fanteso; Kowiyou Yessoufou
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Global agricultural economic water scarcity.

Authors:  Lorenzo Rosa; Davide Danilo Chiarelli; Maria Cristina Rulli; Jampel Dell'Angelo; Paolo D'Odorico
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Four billion people facing severe water scarcity.

Authors:  Mesfin M Mekonnen; Arjen Y Hoekstra
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Future global urban water scarcity and potential solutions.

Authors:  Chunyang He; Zhifeng Liu; Jianguo Wu; Xinhao Pan; Zihang Fang; Jingwei Li; Brett A Bryan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.