Literature DB >> 36260264

Endpoints for geroscience clinical trials: health outcomes, biomarkers, and biologic age.

Steven R Cummings1,2, Stephen B Kritchevsky3.   

Abstract

Treatments that target fundamental processes of aging are expected to delay several aging-related conditions simultaneously. Testing the efficacy of these treatments for potential anti-aging benefits will require clinical trials with endpoints that reflect the potential benefits of slowing processes of aging. There are several potential types of endpoints to capture the benefits of slowing a process of aging, and a consensus is needed to standardize and compare the results of these trials and to guide the analysis of observational data to support trial planning. Using biomarkers instead of clinical outcomes would substantially reduce the size and the duration of clinical trials. This requires validation of surrogate markers showing that treatment induced change in the marker reliably predicts the magnitude of change in the clinical outcome. The surrogate marker must also reflect the biological mechanism for the effect of treatment on the clinical outcome. "Biological age" is a superficially attractive marker for such trials. However, it is essential to establish that treatment induced change in biological age reliably predict the magnitude of benefits in the clinical outcome. Reaching consensus on clinical outcomes for geroscience trials and then validating potential surrogate biomarkers requires time, effort, and coordination that will be worthwhile to develop surrogate outcomes that can be trusted to efficiently test the value of many anti-aging treatments under development.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological age; Clinical trials; Epigenetic age; Geroscience; Surrogate marker

Year:  2022        PMID: 36260264     DOI: 10.1007/s11357-022-00671-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geroscience        ISSN: 2509-2723            Impact factor:   7.581


  13 in total

1.  Composite outcomes in randomized trials: greater precision but with greater uncertainty?

Authors:  Nick Freemantle; Melanie Calvert; John Wood; Joanne Eastaugh; Carl Griffin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  A framework for selection of blood-based biomarkers for geroscience-guided clinical trials: report from the TAME Biomarkers Workgroup.

Authors:  Jamie N Justice; Luigi Ferrucci; Anne B Newman; Vanita R Aroda; Judy L Bahnson; Jasmin Divers; Mark A Espeland; Santica Marcovina; Michael N Pollak; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Nir Barzilai; George A Kuchel
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 7.713

3.  The Design and Rationale of a Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-Blinded, and Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Lomecel-B in Older Adults with Frailty.

Authors:  K Yousefi; K N Ramdas; J G Ruiz; J Walston; H Arai; E Volpi; A B Newman; C Wang; B Hitchinson; L McClain-Moss; L Diaz; G A Green; J M Hare; A A Oliva
Journal:  J Frailty Aging       Date:  2022

4.  A phase IIA randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial to study the efficacy and safety of the selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM), MK-0773 in female participants with sarcopenia.

Authors:  D A Papanicolaou; S N Ather; H Zhu; Y Zhou; J Lutkiewicz; B B Scott; J Chandler
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  Effect of Aspirin on Disability-free Survival in the Healthy Elderly.

Authors:  John J McNeil; Robyn L Woods; Mark R Nelson; Christopher M Reid; Brenda Kirpach; Rory Wolfe; Elsdon Storey; Raj C Shah; Jessica E Lockery; Andrew M Tonkin; Anne B Newman; Jeff D Williamson; Karen L Margolis; Michael E Ernst; Walter P Abhayaratna; Nigel Stocks; Sharyn M Fitzgerald; Suzanne G Orchard; Ruth E Trevaks; Lawrence J Beilin; Geoffrey A Donnan; Peter Gibbs; Colin I Johnston; Joanne Ryan; Barbara Radziszewska; Richard Grimm; Anne M Murray
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Chronic Supplementation With a Mitochondrial Antioxidant (MitoQ) Improves Vascular Function in Healthy Older Adults.

Authors:  Matthew J Rossman; Jessica R Santos-Parker; Chelsea A C Steward; Nina Z Bispham; Lauren M Cuevas; Hannah L Rosenberg; Kayla A Woodward; Michel Chonchol; Rachel A Gioscia-Ryan; Michael P Murphy; Douglas R Seals
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 7.  A critical appraisal of amyloid-β-targeting therapies for Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Francesco Panza; Bruno P Imbimbo; Madia Lozupone; Giancarlo Logroscino
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 42.937

8.  Targeting the biology of ageing with mTOR inhibitors to improve immune function in older adults: phase 2b and phase 3 randomised trials.

Authors:  Joan B Mannick; Grace Teo; Patti Bernardo; Dean Quinn; Kerry Russell; Lloyd Klickstein; William Marshall; Sarb Shergill
Journal:  Lancet Healthy Longev       Date:  2021-05-06

9.  Senolytics in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Results from a first-in-human, open-label, pilot study.

Authors:  Jamie N Justice; Anoop M Nambiar; Tamar Tchkonia; Nathan K LeBrasseur; Rodolfo Pascual; Shahrukh K Hashmi; Larissa Prata; Michal M Masternak; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Nicolas Musi; James L Kirkland
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 8.143

10.  Data mining of human plasma proteins generates a multitude of highly predictive aging clocks that reflect different aspects of aging.

Authors:  Benoit Lehallier; Maxim N Shokhirev; Tony Wyss-Coray; Adiv A Johnson
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 9.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.