| Literature DB >> 36260237 |
Naomi Hayashi1,2, Ippei Fukada3,4, Akihiro Ohmoto5, Masumi Yamazaki3,6, Xiaofei Wang5, Mari Hosonaga4, Shunji Takahashi3,5,6.
Abstract
Performance status (PS) is widely used as an assessment of general condition in patients before performing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). However, PS scoring is dependent on each physician, and there is no objective and universal indicator to identify appropriate patients for CGP. Overall, 263 patients were scored using the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) from 0 to 2 based on the combination of serum albumin and c-reactive protein (CRP): 0, albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dl and CRP ≤ 0.5 mg/dl; 1, albumin < 3.5 g/dl or CRP > 0.5 mg/dl; and 2, albumin < 3.5 g/dl and CRP > 0.5 mg/dl. Overall survival was compared between mGPS 0-1 and mGPS 2 groups. The prognosis of patients with PS 0-1 and mGPS 2 was also evaluated. Thirty-nine patients (14.8%) were mGPS 2. Patients with mGPS 2 had significant shorter survival (14.7 months vs 4.6 months, p < 0.01). Twenty-eight patients were PS 0-1 and mGPS 2, and their survival was also short (5.6 months). Evaluation of mGPS is a simple and useful method for identifying patients with adequate prognosis using CGP.Entities:
Keywords: Comprehensive genomic profiling; Prognosis; mGPS
Year: 2022 PMID: 36260237 PMCID: PMC9582079 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-022-00574-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Discov Oncol ISSN: 2730-6011