Literature DB >> 36259120

Does plantar skin abrasion affect cutaneous mechanosensation?

Bert Wynands1, Claudio Zippenfennig1, Nicholas B Holowka2, Daniel E Lieberman3, Thomas L Milani1.   

Abstract

In humans, plantar cutaneous mechanoreceptors provide critical input signals for postural control during walking and running. Because these receptors are located within the dermis, the mechanical properties of the overlying epidermis likely affect the transmission of external stimuli. Epidermal layers are highly adaptable and can form hard and thick protective calluses, but their effects on plantar sensitivity are currently disputed. Some research has shown no effect of epidermal properties on sensitivity to vibrations, whereas other research suggests that vibration and touch sensitivity diminishes with a thicker and harder epidermis. To address this conflict, we conducted an intervention study where 26 participants underwent a callus abrasion while an age-matched control group (n = 16) received no treatment. Skin hardness and thickness as well as vibration perception thresholds and touch sensitivity thresholds were collected before and after the intervention. The Callus abrasion significantly decreased skin properties. The intervention group exhibited no change in vibration sensitivity but had significantly better touch sensitivity. We argue that touch sensitivity was impeded by calluses because hard skin disperses the monofilament's standardized pressure used to stimulate the mechanoreceptors over a larger area, decreasing indentation depth and therefore stimulus intensity. However, vibration sensitivity was unaffected because the vibrating probe was adjusted to reach specific indentation depths, and thus stimulus intensity was not affected by skin properties. Since objects underfoot necessarily indent plantar skin during weight-bearing, calluses should not affect mechanosensation during standing, walking, or running.
© 2022 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  callus; cutaneous mechanoreceptors; monofilaments; plantar sensitivity; skin properties; vibration thresholds

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36259120      PMCID: PMC9579735          DOI: 10.14814/phy2.15479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Rep        ISSN: 2051-817X


  54 in total

1.  Reflex responses in active muscles elicited by stimulation of low-threshold afferents from the human foot.

Authors:  A M Aniss; S C Gandevia; D Burke
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  ANCOVA versus change from baseline: more power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies [corrected].

Authors:  Gerard J P Van Breukelen
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Differential hypertrophy and atrophy among all types of cutaneous innervation in the glabrous skin of the monkey hand during aging and naturally occurring type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Michel Paré; Phillip J Albrecht; Christopher J Noto; Noni L Bodkin; Gary L Pittenger; David J Schreyer; Xenia T Tigno; Barbara C Hansen; Frank L Rice
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 4.  Cutaneous afferent innervation of the human foot sole: what can we learn from single-unit recordings?

Authors:  Nicholas D J Strzalkowski; Ryan M Peters; J Timothy Inglis; Leah R Bent
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Aged skin: a study by light, transmission electron, and scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  R M Lavker; P S Zheng; G Dong
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 8.551

6.  Modified pressure distribution patterns in walking following reduction of plantar sensation.

Authors:  Eric Eils; Stefan Nolte; Markus Tewes; Lothar Thorwesten; Klaus Völker; Dieter Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Foot callus thickness does not trade off protection for tactile sensitivity during walking.

Authors:  Nicholas B Holowka; Bert Wynands; Tina J Drechsel; Andrew K Yegian; Victoria A Tobolsky; Paul Okutoyi; Robert Mang'eni Ojiambo; Diresibachew W Haile; Timothy K Sigei; Claudio Zippenfennig; Thomas L Milani; Daniel E Lieberman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The role of enhanced plantar-surface sensory feedback on lower limb EMG during planned gait termination.

Authors:  Kelly A Robb; Jordan D Hyde; Stephen D Perry
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 1.111

9.  Vibration Perception Thresholds of Skin Mechanoreceptors Are Influenced by Different Contact Forces.

Authors:  Claudio Zippenfennig; Bert Wynands; Thomas L Milani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  The Mechanoreceptor's Role in Plantar Skin Changes in Individuals with Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Claudio Zippenfennig; Tina J Drechsel; Renan L Monteiro; Isabel C N Sacco; Thomas L Milani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.