| Literature DB >> 36258891 |
Jing Yuan1, Yan Wang1, Zejun Liu2.
Abstract
Chronic diseases are associated with depressive symptoms in older adults. However, the mechanism of this relation is not clear. In this study, we explored the mediating role of instrumental activities of daily living and the moderating role of area of residence in the relationship between chronic diseases and depression. The data was from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Study. Results showed that chronic diseases were positively correlated with depression, and negatively associated with instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). Moreover, IADLs mediated the relationship between chronic diseases and depression. In addition, area of residence (rural/urban) moderated the relation between IADLs and depression, such that this negative relation was stronger for old adults lived in rural area than for urban area. These results have important significance for prevention and intervention of depression in the elderly.Entities:
Keywords: Area of residence; Chronic disease; Depression; Instrumental activities of daily living; Older adults
Year: 2022 PMID: 36258891 PMCID: PMC9561327 DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-03782-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Psychol ISSN: 1046-1310
Fig. 1Moderated mediation model
Means, standard deviations, and correlations among study variables
|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Chronic diseases | 4.04 ± 3.30 | 1 | ||
| 2 IADLs | 19.35 ± 5.60 | − 0.167** | 1 | |
| 3 Depression | 22.42 ± 5.96 | 0.139** | − 0.192** | 1 |
** p < .01
Testing the moderated mediation effect
| Dependent variable | Independent variables | R | LLCI | ULCI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IADLs | 0.63 *** | ||||
| Sex | − 0.09 (0.22) *** | -1.397 | − 0.525 | ||
| Age | − 0.60 (0.01) *** | − 0.339 | − 0.298 | ||
| Co-residence | 0.06 (0.24) ** | 0.204 | 1.158 | ||
| Chronic diseases | − 0.15 (0.03) *** | − 0.319 | − 0.188 | ||
| Depression | 0.19 *** | ||||
| Sex | 0.08 (0.30) ** | 0.310 | 1.487 | ||
| Age | 0.06 (0.01) * | 0.008 | 0.064 | ||
| Co-residence | 0.06 (0.33) * | 0.175 | 1.463 | ||
| Chronic diseases | 0.14 (0.05) *** | 0.156 | 0.333 | ||
| Depression | 0.24 *** | ||||
| Sex | 0.06 (0.30) * | 0.109 | 1.278 | ||
| Age | − 0.06 (0.02) | − 0.067 | 0.003 | ||
| Co-residence | 0.07 (0.33) ** | 0.326 | 1.603 | ||
| Chronic diseases | 0.11 (0.05) *** | 0.102 | 0.280 | ||
| IADLs | − 0.20 (0.03) *** | − 0.280 | − 0.147 | ||
| Depression | 0.34 *** | ||||
| Sex | 0.53 (0.29) | − 0.040 | 1.098 | ||
| Age | − 0.04 (02) * | − 0.068 | − 0.001 | ||
| Co-residence | 0.93 (0.32) ** | 0.304 | 1.545 | ||
| Chronic diseases | 0.24 (0.04) *** | 0.156 | 0.330 | ||
| IADLs | − 0.01 (0.09) | − 0.201 | 0.175 | ||
| Area of residence | 3.05 (0.33) *** | 2.399 | 3.691 | ||
| Int | − 0.14 (0.05) * | − 0.243 | − 0.029 | ||
| Conditional indirect effect of IADLs on Depression at Area of residence | BootLLCI | BootULCI | |||
| urban | − 0.15 (0.048) ** | − 0.244 | − 0.054 | ||
| rural | − 0.28 (0.038) *** | − 0.359 | − 0.210 | ||
*p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001. Standardized regression coefficients appear above. Int = Area of residence×IADLs.
Fig. 2Area of residence as a moderator between IADLs and depression