Literature DB >> 36258869

Diagnostic value and prognostic significance of MRI findings in sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

Jelena Todic1,2, Nils Guinand1, Vincent Lenoir3, Pascal Senn1, Minerva Becker3.   

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and their prognostic value for initial hearing loss and recovery in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). Materials and
Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive adult patients with unilateral SSNHL, contrast-enhanced MRI and audiometric testing evaluated in our institution between 2005 and 2017. MRI reports, patient data, treatment, and audiometric tests were reviewed, with the relationship between MRI findings and hearing loss/recovery analyzed.
Results: Overall, 266 patients were included. Additional symptoms comprised tinnitus (114/266; 43%), vertigo (45/266; 17%), ear pain (26/266; 10%), and ear pressure (6/266; 2%). At least one cardiovascular risk factor (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, cardiopathy, and active smoking) existed in 167/266 (63%) patients. Corticosteroid treatment was followed by 198/266 (74%) patients while contraindications/refusal/compliance precluded treatment in 68/266(26%). Complete, partial or slight hearing recovery occurred in 167/266 (63%) patients. Three MRI patient groups were identified: a group with normal MRI examinations or incidentalomas (128/266; 48%), a group with peripheral auditory system (PAS) lesions (95/266; 36%), and a group with central nervous system (CNS) lesions (43/266; 16%). PAS lesions included lesions from the cochlea to the brain stem (e.g., schwannoma, meningioma, labyrinthitis, intracochlear hemorrhage, vestibulocochlear neuritis), whereas CNS lesions corresponded in 42/43(98%) of cases to leukoaraiosis and other vascular lesions (e.g., stroke, hemorrhage, aneurysm, venous sinus thrombosis, and cavernoma). Belonging to one of the three MRI groups did not influence the degree of initial hearing loss, affected frequencies or treatment, p > .05. Gender and cardiovascular risk factors did neither affect initial hearing loss nor recovery. However, age > 70 years negatively affected initial hearing loss in all frequencies, as well as recovery in all frequencies except 1000 Hz. Also, poor recovery of initial high-frequency hearing loss (>1000 Hz) was significantly associated with CNS lesions.
Conclusion: Age > 70 years and CNS lesions depicted by MRI independently predicted poor auditory recovery, albeit in different frequencies. Lay Summary: In patients with sudden hearing loss, older age (above 70 years) predicts poorer hearing recovery than in younger patients in most hearing frequencies. In addition, abnormalities of brain tissue revealed by MRI predict poorer hearing recovery at high frequencies. Level of Evidence: Level III.
© 2022 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hearing loss; hearing recovery; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); prognosis; sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL)

Year:  2022        PMID: 36258869      PMCID: PMC9575048          DOI: 10.1002/lio2.922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol        ISSN: 2378-8038


  50 in total

1.  The treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  L G Siegel
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 2.  Auditory dysfunction in stroke.

Authors:  R Häusler; R A Levine
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  Three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Makoto Sugiura; Shinji Naganawa; Masaaki Teranishi; Tsutomu Nakashima
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  [Evolution of sudden deafness without treatment].

Authors:  J P Guyot; K Thielen
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr Suppl       Date:  2000

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk factors for sudden sensorineural hearing loss in adults.

Authors:  Rui Jun Lin; Randall Krall; Brian D Westerberg; Neil K Chadha; Justin K Chau
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Analysis of the 3-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (3D-FLAIR) sequence in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Stefano Berrettini; Veronica Seccia; Susanna Fortunato; Francesca Forli; Luca Bruschini; Paolo Piaggi; Raffaello Canapicchi
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.223

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging findings in the auditory pathway of patients with sudden deafness.

Authors:  Antti A Aarnisalo; Hannu Suoranta; Jukka Ylikoski
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Sudden hearing loss: frequency of abnormal findings on contrast-enhanced MR studies.

Authors:  D C Fitzgerald; A S Mark
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  MR imaging of 495 consecutive cases with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  W Wu; K A Thuomas
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.990

10.  Outcomes of unilateral idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: Two decades of experience.

Authors:  Yanjun Xie; Norman A Orabi; Terry A Zwolan; Gregory J Basura
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.