Literature DB >> 36258833

Single versus multiple video-assisted thoracocopic lung biopsy for suspected interstitial lung disease: a perspective on diagnostic efficacy and length of hospital stay.

Şevki Mustafa Demiröz1, Göktürk Fındık1, İlteriş Türk1, Koray Aydoğdu1, Funda İncekara1, Funda Demirağ2, Selim Şakir Erkmen Gülhan1, Sadi Kaya1.   

Abstract

Background: Nearly one-third of the patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) require surgical biopsy for a definite diagnosis. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical (VATS) biopsy has replaced open lung biopsy, but the number of biopsy required to achieve an accurate diagnose is controversial.
Objectives: Our study aims to show that a well-planned single VATS biopsy is as effective as multiple biopsies for the accurate diagnosis of ILD by reduced days of hospital stay.
Methods: We included 111 patients with suspected ILD who underwent VATS biopsy in our study. Patients were separated into three groups according to the number of biopsies obtained. The differences between groups for diagnostic yield, mean time for chest tube removal, perioperative complications, and approximate volume per biopsy were analyzed statistically.
Results: Eighteen single, 74 double, and 19 triple biopsies were made. Mean times of chest tube removal and hospital stay for single, double, and triple biopsy were 3.5, 4.8, and 6.1 days respectively. The number of biopsy and length of hospital stay was strongly related (p = 0.02), but there was no difference for diagnostic yield between single and multiple biopsy groups (p > 0.05). There was no intraoperative complication or perioperative mortality. In postoperative period, eight patients with multiple biopsies had prolonged air leak.
Conclusion: Although classical knowledge suggests multiple biopsies from different locations of the lung are essential, recent reports have shown that the site and the number of biopsy are not as effective as previously thought in achieving the diagnosis for ILD. Our results show that a "single" biopsy, decided with multidisciplinary evaluation, is an effective and safe diagnostic tool, with lesser days of hospital stay. Main novel aspects: 1. The classical knowledge that multiple biopsies should be taken from different regions of the lung in the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases has changed over time.2. Diagnostic concordance between multiple biopsy specimens is above 85%.3. A "single" biopsy, decided with multidisciplinary evaluation, is an effective and safe diagnostic tool with lower days of hospital stay. © Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Interstitial lung disease; Surgical diagnostic technique; Usual interstitial pneumonia; Video-assisted thoracic surgery

Year:  2022        PMID: 36258833      PMCID: PMC9569271          DOI: 10.1007/s12055-022-01408-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0970-9134


  16 in total

1.  A randomized, controlled trial comparing thoracoscopy and limited thoracotomy for lung biopsy in interstitial lung disease.

Authors:  J D Miller; J D Urschel; G Cox; J Olak; J E Young; J M Kay; E McDonald
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Single versus multiple lung biopsies for suspected interstitial lung disease.

Authors:  Mohammed Khalil; Michael Cowen; Mubarak Chaudhry; Mahmoud Loubani
Journal:  Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann       Date:  2016-08-17

Review 3.  Safety and Diagnostic Yield of Transbronchial Lung Cryobiopsy in Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Diseases: A Comparative Study versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Biopsy and a Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Claudia Ravaglia; Martina Bonifazi; Athol U Wells; Sara Tomassetti; Carlo Gurioli; Sara Piciucchi; Alessandra Dubini; Paola Tantalocco; Stefano Sanna; Eva Negri; Irene Tramacere; Valentina Anna Ventura; Alberto Cavazza; Andrea Rossi; Marco Chilosi; Carlo La Vecchia; Stefano Gasparini; Venerino Poletti
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.580

4.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic lung biopsy in the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease: a prospective, multi-center study in 224 patients.

Authors:  Juan J Fibla; Laureano Molins; Ana Blanco; Iñigo Royo; Primitivo Martínez Vallina; Néstor Martínez; Santiago García Barajas; Ana Gomez; Miriam Estors; Milagros Moldes; Esther Fernández; Antoni Xaubet
Journal:  Arch Bronconeumol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Diagnostic thoracoscopic lung biopsy: an outpatient experience.

Authors:  Andrew C Chang; John Yee; Mark B Orringer; Mark D Iannettoni
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Elective video-assisted thoracoscopic lung biopsy for interstitial lung disease.

Authors:  Masafumi Yamaguchi; Ichiro Yoshino; Ryuichi Suemitsu; Atsushi Osoegawa; Toshifumi Kameyama; Tetsuzo Tagawa; Seiichi Fukuyama; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann       Date:  2004-03

7.  Operative indications for lung cancer with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Authors:  K Kushibe; T Kawaguchi; M Takahama; M Kimura; T Tojo; S Taniguchi
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Videothoracoscopic lung biopsy in diffuse infiltrative lung diseases: a 5-year surgical experience.

Authors:  R Zegdi; J Azorin; B Tremblay; M D Destable; P S Lajos; D Valeyre
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Comparison of video thoracoscopic lung biopsy to open lung biopsy in the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease.

Authors:  D D Bensard; R C McIntyre; B J Waring; J S Simon
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: Update of the international multidisciplinary classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias.

Authors:  William D Travis; Ulrich Costabel; David M Hansell; Talmadge E King; David A Lynch; Andrew G Nicholson; Christopher J Ryerson; Jay H Ryu; Moisés Selman; Athol U Wells; Jurgen Behr; Demosthenes Bouros; Kevin K Brown; Thomas V Colby; Harold R Collard; Carlos Robalo Cordeiro; Vincent Cottin; Bruno Crestani; Marjolein Drent; Rosalind F Dudden; Jim Egan; Kevin Flaherty; Cory Hogaboam; Yoshikazu Inoue; Takeshi Johkoh; Dong Soon Kim; Masanori Kitaichi; James Loyd; Fernando J Martinez; Jeffrey Myers; Shandra Protzko; Ganesh Raghu; Luca Richeldi; Nicola Sverzellati; Jeffrey Swigris; Dominique Valeyre
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 21.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.