| Literature DB >> 36258696 |
Nadina Roth1,2, Christiane Sophie Rösch1, Axel Krause1, Manfred Kalteis1, Wolfgang Enkner3, Maria Haller3, Daniel Cejka3, Reinhold Függer1, Matthias Biebl1.
Abstract
Due to immunosuppressive therapy, transplant patients are more susceptible to viral and bacterial infections. A potentially deadly new virus haunted us in 2020: SARS-CoV‑2, causing coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). We analyzed the consequences of this previously unknown risk for our living-donor transplant program in the first year of the pandemic. After the complete lockdown in spring 2020, our transplant center in Linz resumed the living-donor kidney transplantation program from June to September 2020, between the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Austria. We compared the outcomes of these living-donor kidney transplantations with the transplant outcomes of the corresponding periods of the three previous years. From June 4 to September 9, 2020, five living-donor kidney transplantations were performed. All donors and recipients were screened for COVID 19 infection by PCR testing the day before surgery. Kidney transplant recipients remained isolated in single rooms until discharge from hospital. All recipients and donors remained SARS-CoV‑2 negative during the follow-up of 10 months and have been fully vaccinated to date. The number of living transplants in the studied period of 2020 was constant compared to the same months of 2017, 2018, and 2019. Living-donor kidney transplantation can be continued using testing for SARS-CoV‑2 and meticulous hygienic precautions in epidemiologically favorable phases of the SARS-CoV‑2 pandemic. Donors and recipients should be carefully selected and informed about risks and benefits.Entities:
Keywords: Laparoscopic versus open living kidney transplantation; Pandemic; Protective measures; SARS-CoV-2; Single-center-study
Year: 2022 PMID: 36258696 PMCID: PMC9562069 DOI: 10.1007/s10353-022-00781-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Surg ISSN: 1682-1769 Impact factor: 0.796
Donor and recipient demographics June–September 2020
| Recipients | Donors | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years, median | 47 | 58 |
| Sex, female/male | 1/4 | 4/1 |
| Genetically related/genetically unrelated | 4/1 | 4/1 |
| Median eGFR at donation | – | 92.4 ml/min |
| Mild hypertonia | – | 2/5 |
| Hospital stay, median | – | 6 |
| BMI median | – | 28.2 kg/m2 |
Donor and recipient demographics June–September 2017, 2018, 2019,2020; P-value (2020 vs. 2017–2019)
| 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years, donors | 53 | 51 | 52 | 58 | 0.720 |
| Age, years, recipients | 45 | 51 | 32 | 47 | 0.689 |
| Related/unrelated | 2/2 | 2/3 | 4/2 | 4/1 | – |
| Median GFR donors | 99.3 | 114.8 | 103.2 | 92.4 | 0.652 |
| Mild hypertonia | – | – | – | 2/5 | – |
| Hospital stay, days | 7.3 | 6 | 6.8 | 6 | 0.586 |
| BMI median, kg/m2 | 28.7 | 27.1 | 27.6 | 28.2 | 0.733 |
Intra- and postoperative data of donors and recipients June–September 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020; P-value (2020 vs. 2017–2019)
| 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operation time | 173 | 179 | 166 | 165 | 0.659 |
| Warm ischemia | 127 | 142 | 132 | 117 | 0.636 |
| Anastomosis time | 36 | 24 | 25 | 25 | 0.391 |
| Arterial reconstruction | – | 1 | – | 1 | – |
| Cold ischemia | 60 | 54 | 61 | 74 | 0.679 |
| ABO incompatible | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – |
| 2nd transplantation | 1 | – | 1 | 1 | – |
| 1a-3a follow-up creatine mg/dl, donor | 1.23 | 1.24 | 1.28 | 1.22 | 0.621 |
| Complications, donor | – | – | 2 | – | – |
| Graft loss, recipient | 1 | – | – | 1 | – |