Literature DB >> 36258250

Oral arsenic and retinoic acid for high-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Ya-Fang Ma1,2,3, Ying Lu4, Qian Wu5, Yin-Jun Lou1,2,3, Min Yang1,2,3, Jie-Yu Xu1,2,6, Cai-Hong Sun1, Li-Ping Mao1,2,3, Gai-Xiang Xu1,2,3, Li Li1,2,3, Jian Huang1,2,3,7, Huai-Yu Wang8, Li-Jiang Lou9, Hai-Tao Meng1,2,3, Jie-Jing Qian1,2,3, Wen-Juan Yu1,2,3, Ju-Ying Wei1,2,3, Zhen-Yu Li10, Xue-Lu Zhu11, Xiao-Yan Yan11, Su-Ning Chen12, Jie Jin13,14,15, Hong-Hu Zhu16,17,18,19.   

Abstract

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) has become curable over 95% patients under a complete chemo-free treatment with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide in low-risk patients. Minimizing chemotherapy has proven feasible in high-risk patients. We evaluated oral arsenic and ATRA without chemotherapy as an outpatient consolidation therapy and no maintenance for high-risk APL. We conducted a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study with consolidation phases. The consolidation therapy included Realgar-Indigo naturalis formula (60 mg/kg daily in an oral divided dose) in a 4-week-on and 4-week-off regimen for 4 cycles and ATRA (25 mg/m2 daily in an oral divided dose) in a 2-week-on and 2-week-off regimen for 7 cycles. The primary end point was the disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary end points included measurable resident disease, overall survival (OS), and safety. A total of 54 participants were enrolled at seven centers from May 2019. The median age was 40 years. At the median follow-up of 13.8 months (through April 2022), estimated 2-year DFS and OS were 94% and 100% in an intention-to-treat analysis. All the patients achieved complete molecular remission at the end of consolidation phase. Two patients relapsed after consolidation with a cumulative incidence of relapse of 6.2%. The majority of adverse events were grade 1-2, and only three grade 3 adverse events were observed. Oral arsenic plus ATRA without chemotherapy was active as a first-line consolidation therapy for high-risk APL.Trial registration: chictr.org.cn number, ChiCTR1900023309.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consolidation therapy; High-risk APL; Oral arsenic; Phase 2 clinical trial; Realgar–Indigo naturalis formula

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36258250      PMCID: PMC9578225          DOI: 10.1186/s13045-022-01368-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 1756-8722            Impact factor:   23.168


To the editor, Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) has now become a highly curable disease with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) combined treatment. [1, 2] For low-risk patients, defined by a presenting white blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 10 × 109/L, a survival over 95% could be achieved using only ATRA and ATO without chemotherapy in most recent studies. [3-10] For high-risk APL patients (WBC count > 10 × 109/L), two randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies have shown that ATRA + ATO + gemtuzumab ozogamicin/anthracycline as consolidation treatment had a high cure rate and possibly lower relapse rate than ATRA + chemotherapy. [9, 11] One RCT is ongoing to compare ATRA plus ATO vs ATRA plus chemotherapy as consolidation treatment in Europe (registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02688140), and the results have not been reported yet. To further simply the post-remission treatment, we design a protocol using oral arsenic and ATRA without chemotherapy as a first-line consolidation therapy and no maintenance treatment. In our pilot study, the 3-year estimated overall survival (OS) and event-free survival were 100% and 89.4% in 20 high-risk APL patients. [12] From May 2019, we conducted a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study to assess the efficacy and safety of Realgar–Indigo naturalis formula (RIF) plus ATRA as consolidation therapy under an outpatient model for high-risk APL. This trial is ongoing and is registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900023309. The protocol and detailed scheme are shown in supplemental material (Protocol, Additional file 1: Figure S1). Fifty-four eligible patients were enrolled, and an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed. Excluding 15 patients who did not complete the entire consolidation therapy, 39 patients were included in the per-protocol (PP) analysis (Additional file 1: Figure S2). The clinical characteristics of patients in ITT and PP analysis are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. There were 28 males and 26 females, and the median age was 40 years old (17–77 years). The median PML-RARA at enrollment was 0.19% (0–99%). Thirteen patients (24%) received ATRA + ATO/RIF without chemotherapy, and 41 patients (76%) received ATRA + ATO/RIF + chemotherapy as induction regimen. Chemotherapy drugs included anthracycline, cytarabine, and homoharringtonine. RIF and ATO were used in 42 (77.8%) and 12 (22.2%) patients in induction therapy, respectively. Five patients had cerebral hemorrhage in induction therapy, and one of them had brain surgery (Additional file 1: Table S2). With a median follow-up of 13.8 months, the primary end point has been met as estimated 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 93.8% (95% CI: 76.9–98.4%) in ITT analysis. The estimated 2-year OS was 100% in ITT analysis. Estimated 2-year DFS was 93.1% (95% CI: 74.8–98.3%), and estimated 2-year OS was 100% in PP analysis (Fig. 1). These were consistent with the data from clinical trials which just use ATRA and ATO as consolidation therapy, with a DFS of 89% (5 years, n = 52), [3] 89.4% (3 years, n = 20), [12] and 96.4% (2 years, n = 56, Pediatric), [10], respectively. In addition, the survival was also comparable with the data from clinical trials which use ATRA + ATO + chemotherapy as consolidation therapy, with a DFS of 92% (2 years, n = 20), [7] 90.4% (3 years, n = 235), [11].
Fig. 1

Survival among patients in ITT analysis and PP analysis. A DFS in ITT analysis; B DFS in PP analysis; C OS in ITT analysis; D OS in PP analysis; E Cumulative incidence of CMR from the beginning of the consolidation therapy in ITT analysis; and F Cumulative incidence of CMR in PP analysis. The ITT population comprised patients who enrolled and received at least one dose of study medication. The PP population comprised patients of a subgroup of ITT population who had completed the trial and underwent an end-of-therapy evaluation. Abbreviations: ITT: intention-to-treat; PP: per-protocol; DFS: disease-free survival; OS: overall survival; and CMR: complete molecular remission

Survival among patients in ITT analysis and PP analysis. A DFS in ITT analysis; B DFS in PP analysis; C OS in ITT analysis; D OS in PP analysis; E Cumulative incidence of CMR from the beginning of the consolidation therapy in ITT analysis; and F Cumulative incidence of CMR in PP analysis. The ITT population comprised patients who enrolled and received at least one dose of study medication. The PP population comprised patients of a subgroup of ITT population who had completed the trial and underwent an end-of-therapy evaluation. Abbreviations: ITT: intention-to-treat; PP: per-protocol; DFS: disease-free survival; OS: overall survival; and CMR: complete molecular remission Except for 3 patients who were receiving consolidation therapy, the remaining 51 patients all achieved complete molecular remission (CMR), and nearly 90% of them achieved CMR at 4 months from the beginning of induction therapy (Fig. 1). The results of PML-RARA fusion gene test are shown in Additional file 1: Figure S3. Totally, only two patients occurred relapses with a cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years of 6.2%. Detailed information of these two patients is shown in Additional file 1: Table S3. Of the 52 participants who completed at least one cycle of consolidation therapy, 48 completed an adverse event survey. No grade 4–5 adverse events were observed. The most common non-hemopoietic toxic effects were headaches (15%), arthralgia and myalgia (19%), dry (19%), darkened skin (10%), and alopecia (10%). Adverse events such as infection, renal dysfunction, and cardiac toxicity were not observed. The majority of adverse events were grade 1–2, and only three grade 3 adverse events were observed. No patient died in the consolidation phase (Table 1).
Table 1

Adverse events

Adverse eventGrade 1Grade 2Grade3Grade4Grade5
Gastrointestinal reaction
 Nausea and vomiting3 (6%)01 (2%)00
 Diarrhea2 (4%)2 (4%)000
 Hematochezia01 (2%)2 (4%)00
Pain
 Abdominal pain1 (2%)0000
 Headache6 (13%)1 (2%)000
 Arthralgia and Myalgia7 (15%)2 (4%)000
 Chest pain2 (4%)0000
Skin and mucosa
 Dry9 (19%)0000
 Darkened skin5 (10%)0000
 Alopecia5 (10%)0000
 Rash1 (2%)3 (6%)000
Other symptoms
 Fatigue3 (6%)1 (2%)000
 Tinnitus1 (2%)0000
 Epistaxis2 (4%)0000
Laboratory test
 Leukocytopenia1 (2%)1 (2%)000
 Thrombocytopenia1 (2%)0000
 Hepatic dysfunction1 (2%)0000

Data are n (%)

Three grade 3 adverse events were observed. One patient stopped treatment for 2 months due to grade 3 gastrointestinal reaction and then returned to regular treatment. The other one had abdominal pain and hematochezia at diagnosis, and grade 3 hematochezia occurred again during consolidation therapy. Her enteroscopy suggested ischemic bowel disease. Her consolidation therapy was subsequently changed to chemotherapy and followed by ATRA for maintenance therapy. The last one also had grade 3 hematochezia in the third cycle of consolidation therapy. His abdominal CT scan and enteroscopy suggested intussusception and ischemic bowel disease

Adverse events Data are n (%) Three grade 3 adverse events were observed. One patient stopped treatment for 2 months due to grade 3 gastrointestinal reaction and then returned to regular treatment. The other one had abdominal pain and hematochezia at diagnosis, and grade 3 hematochezia occurred again during consolidation therapy. Her enteroscopy suggested ischemic bowel disease. Her consolidation therapy was subsequently changed to chemotherapy and followed by ATRA for maintenance therapy. The last one also had grade 3 hematochezia in the third cycle of consolidation therapy. His abdominal CT scan and enteroscopy suggested intussusception and ischemic bowel disease In summary, this trial found that adult patients with high-risk APL could be successfully and safely treated with oral arsenic plus ATRA as consolidation therapy. A completely oral and chemo-free post-remission treatment without maintenance under an outpatient model will benefit more APL patients. Additional file 1. Figure S1. The treatment schema. The consolidation therapy included RIF (60 mg/kg daily in an oral divided dose) in a 4-week-on and 4-week-off regimen for 4 cycles and ATRA (25 mg/m2 daily in an oral divided dose) in a 2-week-on and 2-week-off regimen for 7 cycles. Of note, treatment cycles were counted according to the cycles of ATRA. Figure S2. Flow chart of participants enrollment, treatment and follow-up. 54 patients were enrolled in the clinical trial and an intention-to-treat analysis were performed. Seven patients had major protocol violation. Four of them suffered cerebral hemorrhage in induction therapy, so their physicians advised two cycles of chemotherapy for consolidation therapy and continued with RIF plus ATRA for 7 cycles. One of them changed protocol for a grade 3 hematochezia. One patient returned to his hometown hospital and changed his treatment plan. The last one did not give a specific reason for the change in treatment. Another seven patients were in consolidation process. Two patients were lost to follow-up and one of them had not completed the trial. Thus 39 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis. Figure S3. PML-RARA tested at 3, 5 and 7 months from the beginning of the induction therapy in ITT analysis.Table S1. Characteristics of the Patients. Table S2. Clinical characteristics and treatment of five patients with cerebral hemorrhage. Table S3. Treatment and outcomes of two relapsed patients. Patient No.1 had cerebral hemorrhage at the time of diagnosis. She had a molecular relapse at 11 months after remission and a central nervous system relapse at 13 months. Patient No.2 had a hematologic relapse at 13 months and achieved remission again after RIF plus ATRA reinduction and alive until last follow-up.
  12 in total

1.  Oral arsenic and retinoic acid for non-high-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Hong-Hu Zhu; Xiao-Jun Huang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  The simpler, the better: oral arsenic for acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Hong-Hu Zhu; Jiong Hu; Francesco Lo-Coco; Jie Jin
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Long-term outcome of acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with all-trans-retinoic acid, arsenic trioxide, and gemtuzumab.

Authors:  Yasmin Abaza; Hagop Kantarjian; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Elihu Estey; Gautam Borthakur; Elias Jabbour; Stefan Faderl; Susan O'Brien; William Wierda; Sherry Pierce; Mark Brandt; Deborah McCue; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Keyur Patel; Steven Kornblau; Tapan Kadia; Naval Daver; Courtney DiNardo; Nitin Jain; Srdan Verstovsek; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Michael Andreeff; Marina Konopleva; Zeev Estrov; Maria Foudray; David McCue; Jorge Cortes; Farhad Ravandi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Oral arsenic and all-trans retinoic acid for high-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Hong-Hu Zhu; Yan-Rong Liu; Jin-Song Jia; Ya-Zhen Qin; Xiao-Su Zhao; Yue-Yun Lai
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Modern approaches to treating acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Miguel A Sanz; Francesco Lo-Coco
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Use of arsenic trioxide in remission induction and consolidation therapy for acute promyelocytic leukaemia in the Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) APML4 study: a non-randomised phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Harry J Iland; Marnie Collins; Ken Bradstock; Shane G Supple; Alberto Catalano; Mark Hertzberg; Peter Browett; Andrew Grigg; Frank Firkin; Lynda J Campbell; Amanda Hugman; John Reynolds; Juliana Di Iulio; Campbell Tiley; Kerry Taylor; Robin Filshie; Michael Seldon; John Taper; Jeff Szer; John Moore; John Bashford; John F Seymour
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 18.959

7.  All-trans-retinoic acid, idarubicin, and IV arsenic trioxide as initial therapy in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML4).

Authors:  Harry J Iland; Ken Bradstock; Shane G Supple; Alberto Catalano; Marnie Collins; Mark Hertzberg; Peter Browett; Andrew Grigg; Frank Firkin; Amanda Hugman; John Reynolds; Juliana Di Iulio; Campbell Tiley; Kerry Taylor; Robin Filshie; Michael Seldon; John Taper; Jeff Szer; John Moore; John Bashford; John F Seymour
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Arsenic trioxide replacing or reducing chemotherapy in consolidation therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL2012 trial).

Authors:  Li Chen; Hong-Ming Zhu; Yan Li; Qi-Fa Liu; Yu Hu; Jian-Feng Zhou; Jie Jin; Jian-Da Hu; Ting Liu; De-Pei Wu; Jie-Ping Chen; Yong-Rong Lai; Jian-Xiang Wang; Juan Li; Jian-Yong Li; Xin Du; Xin Wang; Ming-Zhen Yang; Jin-Song Yan; Gui-Fang Ouyang; Li Liu; Ming Hou; Xiao-Jun Huang; Xiao-Jing Yan; Dan Xu; Wei-Ming Li; Deng-Ju Li; Yin-Jun Lou; Zheng-Jun Wu; Ting Niu; Ying Wang; Xiao-Yang Li; Jian-Hua You; Hui-Jin Zhao; Yú Chen; Yang Shen; Qiu-Sheng Chen; Yù Chen; Jian Li; Bing-Shun Wang; Wei-Li Zhao; Jian-Qing Mi; Kan-Kan Wang; Jiong Hu; Zhu Chen; Sai-Juan Chen; Jun-Min Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Assessment of Arsenic Trioxide and All-trans Retinoic Acid for the Treatment of Pediatric Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group AAML1331 Trial.

Authors:  Matthew A Kutny; Todd A Alonzo; Oussama Abla; Madhvi Rajpurkar; Robert B Gerbing; Yi-Cheng Wang; Betsy A Hirsch; Susana Raimondi; Samir Kahwash; Kristina K Hardy; Steven Hardy; Soheil Meshinchi; Alan S Gamis; Edward A Kolb; James H Feusner; John Gregory
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  Arsenic trioxide and all-trans retinoic acid treatment for acute promyelocytic leukaemia in all risk groups (AML17): results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Alan K Burnett; Nigel H Russell; Robert K Hills; David Bowen; Jonathan Kell; Steve Knapper; Yvonne G Morgan; Jennie Lok; Angela Grech; Gail Jones; Asim Khwaja; Lone Friis; Mary Frances McMullin; Ann Hunter; Richard E Clark; David Grimwade
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 41.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.