Literature DB >> 36258236

Predictors of acarbose therapeutic efficacy in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in China.

Rong Zhang1, Quanxi Zhao2, Rong Li3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acarbose is one of the optimal drugs for patients with the first diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). But what kind of emerging patients has the best therapeutic response to acarbose therapy has never been reported. To this end, we investigated predictors of acarbose therapeutic efficacy in newly diagnosed T2DM patients in China.
METHODS: A total of 346 T2DM patients received acarbose monotherapy for 48 weeks as part of participating in the Study of Acarbose in Newly Diagnosed Patients with T2DM in China (MARCH study) from November 2008 to June 2011. Change in glycated hemoglobin (ΔHbA1c) served as a dependent variable while different baseline variables including sex, age, disease duration, weight, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h postprandial blood glucose (2 h PG), fasting insulin (FINS), 2-h postprandial insulin (2 h INS), early insulin secretion index (IGI), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), homeostasis model assessment of beta cell function (HOMA-B), area under the curve (AUC) of glucagon, insulin and GLP-1 were assessed as independent predictors. Step-wise multiple linear regression was employed for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The results suggested that independent predictors of ΔHbA1c at 12 weeks included baseline body weight (β = - 0.012, P = 0.006), DBP (β = 0.010, P = 0.047), FPG (β = 0.111, P = 0.005) and 2 h PG (β = 0.042, P = 0.043). Independent predictors of ΔHbA1c at 24 weeks included disease duration (β = 0.040, P = 0.019) and FPG (β = 0.117, P = 0.001). Finally, independent predictor of ΔHbA1c at 48 weeks was disease duration (β = 0.038, P = 0.046).
CONCLUSIONS: Acarbose may be more effective in newly diagnosed T2DM patients with low FPG, low 2 h PG and obesity. The earlier T2DM is diagnosed and continuously treated with acarbose, the better the response to therapy.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acarbose; Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus; Predictors; Therapeutic efficacy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36258236      PMCID: PMC9580108          DOI: 10.1186/s40360-022-00621-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol        ISSN: 2050-6511            Impact factor:   2.605


  12 in total

1.  Effect of different dietary patterns on glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review.

Authors:  Gabrielli Barbosa de Carvalho; Natalia Lohayne Dias-Vasconcelos; Ramara Kadija Fonseca Santos; Paula Nascimento Brandão-Lima; Danielle Góes da Silva; Liliane Viana Pires
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2019-06-16       Impact factor: 11.176

Review 2.  Glucolipotoxicity and beta cells in type 2 diabetes mellitus: target for durable therapy?

Authors:  Daniel H van Raalte; Michaela Diamant
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.602

3.  A comparative study of acarbose, vildagliptin and saxagliptin intended for better efficacy and safety on type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment.

Authors:  Zhongchao Wang; Jing Wang; Jianxia Hu; Ying Chen; Bingzi Dong; Yangang Wang
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.037

4.  Analysis of the add-on effect of α-glucosidase inhibitor, acarbose in insulin therapy: A pilot study.

Authors:  Feng-Fei Li; Li-Yuan Fu; Xiao-Hua Xu; Xiao-Fei Su; Jin-Dan Wu; Lei Ye; Jian-Hua Ma
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2016-08-25

5.  Effects of low intensity exercise therapy on early phase insulin secretion in overweight subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Ryoma Michishita; Naoko Shono; Takaki Kasahara; Toshiyuki Tsuruta
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 5.602

6.  Acarbose compared with metformin as initial therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: an open-label, non-inferiority randomised trial.

Authors:  Wenying Yang; Jie Liu; Zhongyan Shan; Haoming Tian; Zhiguang Zhou; Qiuhe Ji; Jianping Weng; Weiping Jia; Juming Lu; Jing Liu; Yuan Xu; Zhaojun Yang; Wei Chen
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 32.069

7.  Pancreatic B-cell function is altered by oxidative stress induced by acute hyperglycaemia.

Authors:  Y Miyazaki; H Kawano; T Yoshida; S Miyamoto; J Hokamaki; Y Nagayoshi; H Yamabe; H Nakamura; J Yodoi; H Ogawa
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.359

8.  Acarbose With Comparable Glucose-Lowering but Superior Weight-Loss Efficacy to Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Fang Zhang; Shishi Xu; Lizhi Tang; Xiaohui Pan; Nanwei Tong
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Method for evaluating the human bioequivalence of acarbose based on pharmacodynamic parameters.

Authors:  Su-Mei Xu; Yu-Ying Xu; Juan Yan; Yi-Fei Zhang; Dai Li; Dan Li; Xiao-Min Li; Jie Guo; Ping-Sheng Xu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.671

10.  Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  Melanie J Davies; David A D'Alessio; Judith Fradkin; Walter N Kernan; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Apostolos Tsapas; Deborah J Wexler; John B Buse
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.