Literature DB >> 36258142

Quitting thresholds in visual search are impacted by target present detection times but not their variability.

Mark W Becker1, Andrew Rodriguez2, Dana Pontious2.   

Abstract

Models of visual search posit that target absent responses occur when the quitting threshold for the trial is reached before a target is detected, and that feedback about missed targets allows the quitting threshold to be adaptively set to the difficulty of the search task. While these models may effectively capture processes in lab-based tasks, in real-world searches feedback is often impossible to provide. Instead, observers have little information about their errors, and may only be aware of when they successfully detect the target. We posit that in the absence of feedback the time required to find a target might influence quitting thresholds. In three experiments, we investigate how manipulating the mean time and the standard deviation of time to detect a target influence quitting thresholds in target absent trials. To vary target detection times while holding the search stimuli constant, we used an eye-movement contingent change to surreptitiously introduce a target near fixation at a particular time. Results show that decreasing the mean time to find a target also decreases the number of items inspected and reaction time in target absent trials, the hallmark of a shift in the quitting threshold. By contrast, varying the standard deviation around a fixed mean had no impact on target absent search times. These findings suggest that people are sensitive to the typical time required to find a target in a given task and use that information to flexibly adjust target absent quitting thresholds, but people are not sensitive to the variability.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Change blindness; Eye movements and visual attention; Visual search

Year:  2022        PMID: 36258142     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02591-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.157


  8 in total

1.  Global transsaccadic change blindness during scene perception.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-09

2.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search.

Authors:  Antonio Torralba; Aude Oliva; Monica S Castelhano; John M Henderson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The ultra-rare-item effect: visual search for exceedingly rare items is highly susceptible to error.

Authors:  Stephen R Mitroff; Adam T Biggs
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-11-22

4.  Just say no: how are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?

Authors:  M M Chun; J M Wolfe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Decision processes in visual search as a function of target prevalence.

Authors:  Chad Peltier; Mark W Becker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Varying target prevalence reveals two dissociable decision criteria in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Michael J Van Wert
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.