Celia Y Chen1, Megan E Romano2,3, Nathan G Giffard1, Saige A Gitlin1, Marta Rardin4, Jonathan M Petali4. 1. Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. 2. Department of Epidemiology, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. megan.e.romano@dartmouth.edu. 3. One Medical Center Drive, Hinman, Box 7927, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA. megan.e.romano@dartmouth.edu. 4. Environmental Health Program, New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, Concord, NH, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a diverse class of persistent, fluorinated surfactants used widely in industrial and commercial applications with known adverse health effects. Seafood consumption is thought to be an underappreciated source of PFAS exposure in the general population. This review synthesizes the current understanding of PFAS occurrence in shellfish, a term used to describe animals such as mollusk bivalves, certain gastropods (snails), cephalopods (e.g., octopuses and squid), and crustaceans, and highlights scientific gaps relative to bioaccumulation and the protection of shellfish consumers. RECENT FINDINGS: A range of sampling methodologies are used across studies, and the suite of PFAS surveyed across studies is highly variable. Concentrations of PFAS observed in shellfish vary by geographic location, shellfish species, habitat, and across PFAS compounds, and studies informing estimates of bioaccumulation of PFAS in shellfish are extremely limited at this time. This review identifies several important opportunities for researchers to standardize PFAS sampling techniques, sample preparation, and analytical methodologies to allow for better comparison of PFAS analytes both within and across future studies. Increasing the range of geographic locations where samples are collected is also a critical priority to support a greater knowledge of worldwide PFAS contamination. When put into the context of risk to consumer, concentrations of PFAS, especially PFOS, found in shellfish collected from sites containing aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) and industrial contamination may present risks to frequent consumers. Further research is needed to protect shellfish consumers and to inform shellfish advisories and health protective policies.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a diverse class of persistent, fluorinated surfactants used widely in industrial and commercial applications with known adverse health effects. Seafood consumption is thought to be an underappreciated source of PFAS exposure in the general population. This review synthesizes the current understanding of PFAS occurrence in shellfish, a term used to describe animals such as mollusk bivalves, certain gastropods (snails), cephalopods (e.g., octopuses and squid), and crustaceans, and highlights scientific gaps relative to bioaccumulation and the protection of shellfish consumers. RECENT FINDINGS: A range of sampling methodologies are used across studies, and the suite of PFAS surveyed across studies is highly variable. Concentrations of PFAS observed in shellfish vary by geographic location, shellfish species, habitat, and across PFAS compounds, and studies informing estimates of bioaccumulation of PFAS in shellfish are extremely limited at this time. This review identifies several important opportunities for researchers to standardize PFAS sampling techniques, sample preparation, and analytical methodologies to allow for better comparison of PFAS analytes both within and across future studies. Increasing the range of geographic locations where samples are collected is also a critical priority to support a greater knowledge of worldwide PFAS contamination. When put into the context of risk to consumer, concentrations of PFAS, especially PFOS, found in shellfish collected from sites containing aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) and industrial contamination may present risks to frequent consumers. Further research is needed to protect shellfish consumers and to inform shellfish advisories and health protective policies.
Authors: Håkon A Langberg; Hans Peter H Arp; Gijs D Breedveld; Gøril A Slinde; Åse Høiseter; Hege M Grønning; Morten Jartun; Thomas Rundberget; Bjørn M Jenssen; Sarah E Hale Journal: Environ Pollut Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 8.071
Authors: Krista Y Christensen; Michelle Raymond; Michael Blackowicz; Yangyang Liu; Brooke A Thompson; Henry A Anderson; Mary Turyk Journal: Environ Res Date: 2017-01-07 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Anna Gulkowska; Qinting Jiang; Man Ka So; Sachi Taniyasu; Paul K S Lam; Nobuyoshi Yamashita Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2006-06-15 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Philippe Favreau; Chantal Poncioni-Rothlisberger; Benjamin J Place; Harold Bouchex-Bellomie; Andreas Weber; Josef Tremp; Jennifer A Field; Marcel Kohler Journal: Chemosphere Date: 2016-12-28 Impact factor: 7.086
Authors: Heinz Rüdel; Josef Müller; Heinrich Jürling; Martina Bartel-Steinbach; Jan Koschorreck Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Mohamed Abou-Elwafa Abdallah; Nina Wemken; Daniel Simon Drage; Christina Tlustos; Claire Cellarius; Kathy Cleere; John J Morrison; Sean Daly; Marie Ann Coggins; Stuart Harrad Journal: Chemosphere Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 7.086