| Literature DB >> 36254306 |
Jinliang Wang1, Yang Zhang2, Haijiao Shi3, Ying Yang3, Shuai Wang3, Fengrong Wang3.
Abstract
The localization of a protein's submitochondrial structure is important for therapeutic design of associated disorders caused by mitochondrial abnormalities because many human diseases are directly tied to mitochondria. When Lon protease expression changes, glycolysis replaces respiratory metabolism in the cell, which is a common occurrence in cancer cells. The fact that protein formation is a dynamic research object makes it impossible to reproduce the unique living environment of proteins in an experimental setting, which surely makes it more challenging to determine protein function through experiments. This research suggests a model of Lon protease-based mitochondrial protection under myocardial ischemia based on ML (machine learning). To ensure the balance of all submitochondrial proteins, the data set is processed using a random oversampling method, each overlapping fixed-length subsequence that is created from the protein sequence functions as a channel in the convolution layer. The results demonstrate that applying the oversampling strategy increases the ROC value by 17.6%-21.3%. Our prediction method is successful as evidenced by the fact that ML prediction outperforms the predictions of other conventional classifiers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36254306 PMCID: PMC9569194 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4805009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Figure 1RF classification.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of protection model construction.
Results of different feature extraction algorithms in M317 data set.
| Evaluating indicator | Our | Ref [ | Ref [ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average accuracy | 0.9622 | 0.857 | 0.921 |
| Overall positioning accuracy | 0.9571 | 0.8553 | 0.9249 |
| Overall accuracy rate | 0.911 | 0.8533 | 0.8945 |
Results of different feature extraction algorithms in M495 data set.
| Evaluating indicator | Our | Ref [ | Ref [ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average accuracy | 0.973 | 0.8426 | 0.8768 |
| Overall positioning accuracy | 0.9553 | 0.871 | 0.9003 |
| Overall accuracy rate | 0.9553 | 0.864 | 0.879 |
Figure 3Distance and mutual information diagram of conformational change of residues.
Figure 4Distance of conformational change of residues and distribution of mutual information.
Figure 5Prediction accuracy of different layers.
Figure 6ROC curve of predictor in balanced data set.
Figure 7Contrast result.