| Literature DB >> 36254217 |
Enock Enock Rakwa1, Benoît Bargui Koubala2, Bertrand Ndou Mando3, Mathieu Djongra3, Francis Nveikoueing3, Dieudonné Ndjonka3.
Abstract
Onchocerciasis is a major public health problem caused by Onchocerca volvulus parasite and transmitted to humans via black flies (simulium) bites. The control of onchocerciasis relies much on the use of the chemical drug ivermectin, which is only effective against microfilariae and has led to drug resistance. This study was carried out to assess the in vitro antifilarial activity of methanolic extract of Indigofera tinctoria and its most active fractions on adult male O. ochengi worm, the closest model to O. volvulus, after 48 h and 72 h of treatment. Worms' viability was determined biochemically by MTT/formazan colorimetry assay. The promising plant extract's acute and subacute oral toxicity were evaluated on both mice and rats. The result revealed a highest antifilarial activity of the methanolic extract (LC50 = 12.28 μg/mL) compared to ivermectin (LC50 = 26.50 μg/mL) after 72 h of treatment. Out of the eight (08), chromatographic fractions screened, only three (03) fractions (C, F, and G) revealed the highest anti-Onchocerca activity after 72 h of treatment. An oral administration of the plant extract at a single dose of 2000 mg/kg did not produce any toxicity in mice. After repeated daily administration of methanolic extract of I. tinctoria (250 mg/kg, 500 mg/kg, and 1000 mg/kg) for 28 days, no significant changes in body weight, biochemical, and haematological parameters was observed. Histopathological examination of organs did not reveal any sign of alteration. The phytochemical analysis of the methanolic extract of I. tinctoria revealed the presence of various phenolic compounds. Therefore, this study demonstrated the potential antifilarial activity of Indigofera tinctoria and offered an alternative to treating onchocerciasis. Moreover, further studies could be developed in promising new antifilarial sources of the isolated compound and in vivo antifilarial activity of Indigofera tinctoria in the animal model needs to be studied.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36254217 PMCID: PMC9569218 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7828551
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Parasitol Res ISSN: 2090-0023
Extraction yield of Indigofera tinctoria leaves obtained using solvents of increasing polarity.
| Mass of the powder (g) | Solvent | Mass of the extract (g) | Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 680.00 | Hexane | 16.32 | 2.40 |
| 663.68 | Methylene chloride | 13.25 | 2.00 |
| 650.43 | Methanol | 102.30 | 15.73 |
Figure 1Lethal effect of the methanolic extract (a) and Ivermectin (b) concentrations on Onchocerca ochengi after 48 h and 72 h of incubation. Itmeth: Methanolic extract of Indiofera tinctoria; Ivm: ivermectin.
Lethal concentrations values (LC50) of methanolic crude extract and ivermectin.
| Time | Lethal concentrations 50 ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Itmeth | Ivm | |
| 48 h | 28.16 ± 2.68b | 68.237 ± 6.28a |
| 72 h | 12.28 ± 3.13b | 26.50 ± 3.48a |
Values are mean ± SEM. Value sharing any one common superscript in a row does not differ significantly (p > 0.001). Itmeth: methanolic extract of I. tinctoria; Ivm: Ivermectin; and SEM: standard error of the mean.
Figure 2Effect of chromatographic fractions of Indigofera tinctoria on Onchocerca ochengi after 72 h of incubation.
Lethal concentrations values (LC50) of methanolic crude extract and chromatographic fractions.
| Incubation Times | Lethal concentrations 50 ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Itmeth | FC | FF | FG | IVM | |
| 48 h | 28.16 ± 2.68 | 17.56 ± 5.85 | 52.48 ± 7.84 | 34.19 ± 11.91 | 68.24 ± 6.28 |
| 72 h | 12.28 ± 3.13 | 8.17 ± 0.87 | 3.21 ± 1.14 | 2.83 ± 0.53 | 26.50 ± 3.48 |
Values are mean ± SEM. Value sharing any one common superscript in a row does not differ significantly (p > 0.001). Itmeth: methanolic extract of I. tinctoria; FC: fraction C; FF: fraction F; FG: fraction G; Ivm: ivermectin; and SEM: standard error of the mean.
Phytochemical qualities of the crude extract of Indigofera tinctoria leaves.
| Chemical compound | Hexane extract | Methylene chloride extract | Methanol extract |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polyphenols | — | + | ++ |
| Flavonoids | — | — | + |
| Tanins | — | + | ++ |
| Anthraquinon | — | — | + |
| Alkaloids | + | + | — |
| Triterpenes | + | + | +++ |
| Sterols | + | + | + |
| Saponin | + | + | + |
-: absent; +: present; ++: abundant; and +++: very abundant.
Effect of the methanolic extract of Indigofera tinctoria on body organ weight after 28 days of treatment.
| Treatment group | Relative organ weight | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heart | Liver | Kidney | Lung | ||
| Male | Control | 0.760 ± 0.13a | 7.121 ± 1.58b | 1.463 ± 0.06c | 2.193 ± 0.87d |
| 250 mg/kg | 0.763 ± 0.11a | 6.550 ± 1.98b | 1.455 ± 0.40c | 1.787 ± 0.52d | |
| 500 mg/kg | 0.657 ± 0.04a | 6.804 ± 0.23b | 1.387 ± 0.09c | 2.034 ± 0.16d | |
| 1000 mg/kg | 0.746 ± 0.02a | 7.616 ± 1.05b | 1.712 ± 0.10c | 2.608 ± 0.77d | |
|
| |||||
| Female | Control | 0.687 ± 0.12a | 6.250 ± 0.93b | 1.300 ± 0.23c | 2.162 ± 0.18d |
| 250 mg/kg | 0.639 ± 0.13a | 5.283 ± 0.96b | 1.127 ± 0.05c | 1.822 ± 0.46d | |
| 500 mg/kg | 0.676 ± 0.04a | 5.372 ± 2.69b | 1.283 ± 0.22c | 1.750 ± 0.09d | |
| 1000 mg/kg | 0.575 ± 0.07a | 5.220 ± 0.69b | 1.076 ± 0.04c | 1.542 ± 0.07d | |
Values are mean ± standard deviation of three replicates (n = 3). In the same column, values followed by different superscript letters are different (p < 0.05).
Effect of the methanolic extract of Indigofera tinctoria on haematological parameter after 28 days treatment.
| Haematological parameter | Sex | Treatment group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 250 mg/kg | 500 mg/kg | 1000 mg/kg | ||
| WBC count (x103/ | Males ( | 7.88 ± 0.90a | 11.25 ± 2.75a | 12.26 ± 5.20a | 12.06 ± 5.48a |
| Females ( | 14.75 ± 4.56a | 9.26 ± 0.21a | 10.55 ± 4.17a | 8.42 ± 1.27a | |
|
| |||||
| RBC count (x106/ | Males ( | 7.40 ± 1.07a | 9.24 ± 0.76a | 9.12 ± 0.65a | 8.66 ± 1.04a |
| Females ( | 9.10 ± 0.98a | 7.22 ± 0.01a | 8.97 ± 0.86a | 8.29 ± 2.01a | |
|
| |||||
| Haemoglobin (g/dL) | Males ( | 12.73 ± 1.72a | 15.03 ± 1.40a | 14.89 ± 0.72a | 14.79 ± 2.03a |
| Females ( | 14.71 ± 2.02a | 12.88 ± 0.35a | 14.41 ± 0.57a | 13.75 ± 3.55a | |
|
| |||||
| Haematocrit (%) | Males ( | 38.090 ± 4.79a | 46.398 ± 6.55a | 44.79 ± 3.96a | 44.714 ± 6.81a |
| Females ( | 44.53 ± 5.43a | 38.33 ± 0.21a | 43.59 ± 4.95a | 40.82 ± 9.04a | |
|
| |||||
| Platelet count (x103/ | Males ( | 513.50 ± 20.00a | 514.21 ± 21.37a | 685.21 ± 18.14a | 542.72 ± 15.10a |
| Females ( | 675.07 ± 12.01a | 491.51 ± 21.82a | 406.20 ± 28.79a | 684.47 ± 20.50a | |
|
| |||||
| Lymphocytes (%) | Males ( | 4.43 ± 0.65a | 7.07 ± 1.88a | 7.16 ± 2.84a | 6.68 ± 3.63a |
| Females ( | 7.40 ± 2.05a | 5.83 ± 0.35a | 6.27 ± 3.46a | 4.36 ± 1.16a | |
|
| |||||
| Monocytes (%) | Males ( | 0.40 ± 0.10a | 0.56 ± 0.15a | 0.50 ± 0.26a | 0.73 ± 0.49a |
| Females ( | 0.74 ± 0.06a | 0.54 ± 0.07a | 0.51 ± 0.28a | 0.35 ± 0.06a | |
|
| |||||
| Granulocytes (%) | Males ( | 3.03 ± 1.50a | 3.62 ± 0.80a | 4.60 ± 2.13a | 4.64 ± 1.91a |
| Females ( | 6.60 ± 2.96a | 2.88 ± 0.64a | 3.76 ± 0.42a | 3.71 ± 0.97a | |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. n = 3 females, n = 3 males. In each sex, the haematological parameters of the treated groups are compared to the control (ANOVA followed by multiple comparison test of Dunnett). The values sharing any one common superscript in the same row do not differ (p > 0.05). WBC: White Blood Cell Count, RBC: Red blood cell count.
Effect of the methanolic extract of Indigofera tinctoria on biochemical parameters after 28 days of treatment.
| Treatment group | Biochemical parameters | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urea (mg/L) | Creatine (mg/L) | AST (U/L) | ALT (U/L) | Albumin (g/L) | Total protein (g/DL) | ||
| Male | Control | 3.41 ± 0.08a | 5.23 ± 1.78a | 250.08 ± 93.47a | 117.34 ± 12.38a | 36.24 ± 2.44a | 2.77 ± 0.23a |
| 250 mg/kg | 4.27 ± 1.20a | 5.42 ± 0.98a | 197.60 ± 34.53a | 77.24 ± 17.24a | 40.60 ± 9.08a | 3.44 ± 0.21a | |
| 500 mg/kg | 3.26 ± 0.15a | 4.89 ± 0.29a | 192.00 ± 46.36a | 104.08 ± 24.73a | 36.86 ± 0.97a | 3.10 ± 0.35a | |
| 1000 mg/kg | 3.26 ± 0.43a | 5.85 ± 0.95a | 299.27 ± 201.73a | 83.33 ± 53.21a | 39.00 ± 4.66a | 3.33 ± 1.11a | |
|
| |||||||
| Female | Control | 3.14 ± 1.53a | 6.23 ± 0.58a | 258.31 ± 150.57a | 83.88 ± 42.31a | 38.88 ± 2.86a | 2.87 ± 0.70a |
| 250 mg/kg | 3.96 ± 0.46a | 5.77 ± 0.99a | 244.16 ± 70.13a | 69.08 ± 10.34a | 37.17 ± 2.9a | 4.39 ± 0.64a | |
| 500 mg/kg | 3.56 ± 0.10a | 6.31 ± 0.64a | 154.70 ± 5.90a | 71.59 ± 6.65a | 36.94 ± 5.97a | 3.25 ± 0.14a | |
| 1000 mg/kg | 3.46 ± 0.48a | 4.81 ± 0.67a | 244.65 ± 18.61a | 104.72 ± 58.84a | 33.22 ± 5.05a | 4.69 ± 9.19a | |
Values are mean ± standard deviation of three replicates (n = 3). In each sex, biochemical parameters of the treated groups are compared to the control (ANOVA followed to multiple comparison test of Dunnett). The values followed by the same superscript letters in the same column are not different (p > 0.05).
Figure 3Photomicrographs of rats' liver (H&E, X200) and kidney (H&E, X200). Liver (a)1: control group; (a)2: treated group at 1000 mg/kg); kidney histology (b)1: control group, (b)2: treated group at 1000 mg/kg) of male albino Wistar rats showing relatively normal architecture. A slight liver inflammation has been noted, characterised by a slight leucocyte infiltration and vascular congestion.