Literature DB >> 36254005

Resource utilization and variation among practitioners for evaluating voice hoarseness secondary to suspected reflux disease: A retrospective chart review.

Sydney R A Korsunsky1, Leonel Camejo2, Diep Nguyen1, Rahul Mhaskar1, Khattiya Chharath3, Joy Gaziano4, Joel Richter4, Vic Velanovich3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the variation in resource utilization for the diagnosis and treatment of dysphonia or hoarseness in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPRD) and/or gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). Secondary data was collected from a single-institution database of charts from patients evaluated between October 1, 2011 and March 31, 2020. This study was conducted as a retrospective chart review. Key outcome variables included demographic data, initial specialty visit, date of first symptom evaluation to final follow-up visit, additional procedural evaluation, and final diagnosis as attributed by the diagnosing physician. Inclusion criteria included patients ≥18 older referred to providers for suspected LPRD/GERD with a primary complaint of voice changes or hoarseness and appeared for follow-up. A total of 134 subjects were included for analysis. Data analysis included descriptive and univariate analysis, chi-square test of independence, independent means t test, and 1-way analysis of variance. Most patients (88) received some form of procedural evaluation in addition to clinical evaluation. The most frequent was videostroboscopy (59). Patients who first visited a gastroenterologist were more likely to undergo esophageal pH-monitoring (n = 14, P < .001) and manometry (n = 10, P < .001). Patients referred to speech-language pathology were very likely to undergo videostroboscopic evaluation (n = 7, P < .001). The prevailing final diagnosis as attributed by the diagnosing physician was confirmed to be of non-reflux etiology (49) or due to GERD alone (34). LPRD only was the least frequent diagnosis (10). Our results demonstrate that there is significant variation in the number and type of diagnostic tests based on the type of practitioner initially seen by the patient. Additionally, of patients thought to have voice change or hoarseness because of LPRD and/or GERD, more than a third had a non-reflux cause of their symptoms. Further research should identify beneficial patterns in resource utilization and further diagnostic utility of diagnostic procedures for more accurate diagnosis.
Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36254005      PMCID: PMC9575706          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.817


  24 in total

1.  Gastroesophageal reflux in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients: Clinical features and therapeutic response.

Authors:  Jerome R Lechien; Francois Bobin; Vinciane Muls; Pierre Eisendrath; Mihaela Horoi; Marie-Paule Thill; Didier Dequanter; Jean-Pierre Durdurez; Alexandra Rodriguez; Sven Saussez
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 2.  Are lifestyle measures effective in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease? An evidence-based approach.

Authors:  Tonya Kaltenbach; Seth Crockett; Lauren B Gerson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-05-08

Review 3.  Hoarseness Guidelines Redux: Toward Improved Treatment of Patients with Dysphonia.

Authors:  David O Francis; Libby J Smith
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Rethinking the laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment algorithm: Evaluating an alternate empiric dosing regimen and considering up-front, pH-impedance, and manometry testing to minimize cost in treating suspect laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.

Authors:  Thomas L Carroll; Astrid Werner; Kael Nahikian; Aaron Dezube; Douglas F Roth
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  High economic burden of caring for patients with suspected extraesophageal reflux.

Authors:  David O Francis; Jennifer A Rymer; James C Slaughter; Yash Choksi; Pawina Jiramongkolchai; Evbu Ogbeide; Christopher Tran; Marion Goutte; C Gaelyn Garrett; David Hagaman; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Otolaryngology utilization of speech-language pathology services for voice disorders.

Authors:  Seth M Cohen; Michaela A Dinan; Jaewhan Kim; Nelson Roy
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 7.  Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Atypical Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Caroline M Barrett; Dhyanesh Patel; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2020-01-22

Review 8.  Voice outcomes of laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: a systematic review of 1483 patients.

Authors:  Jérôme R Lechien; Camille Finck; Pedro Costa de Araujo; Kathy Huet; Véronique Delvaux; Myriam Piccaluga; Bernard Harmegnies; Sven Saussez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease treated with laparoscopic fundoplication.

Authors:  Eeva Sala; Paulina Salminen; Susanna Simberg; Juha Koskenvuo; Jari Ovaska
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 10.  Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A State-of-the-Art Algorithm Management for Primary Care Physicians.

Authors:  Jerome R Lechien; Sven Saussez; Vinciane Muls; Maria R Barillari; Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba; Stéphane Hans; Petros D Karkos
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.