Elizabeth J de Koster1, Adriana C H van Engen-van Grunsven2, Johan Bussink3, Cathelijne Frielink4, Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei4,5,6, Benno Kusters2, Hans Peters3, Wim J G Oyen4,7,8, Dennis Vriens5. 1. Department of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Lisanne.deKoster@radboudumc.nl. 2. Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapy & OncoImmunology Laboratory, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands. 4. Department of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 5. Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. 6. Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. 7. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands. 8. Department of Biomedical Sciences and Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The current study explored the association between 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) uptake and the quantitative expression of immunohistochemical markers related to glucose metabolism, hypoxia, and cell proliferation in benign and malignant thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology. PROCEDURES: Using a case-control design, 24 patients were selected from participants of a randomized controlled multicenter trial (NCT02208544) in which [18F]FDG-PET/CT and thyroid surgery were performed for Bethesda III and IV nodules. Three equally sized groups of [18F]FDG-positive malignant, [18F]FDG-positive benign, and [18F]FDG-negative benign nodules were included. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for glucose transporters (GLUT) 1, 3, and 4; hexokinases (HK) 1 and 2; hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF1α; monocarboxylate transporter 4 (MCT4); carbonic anhydrase IX (CA-IX); vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); sodium-iodide symporter (NIS); and Ki-67. Marker expression was scored using an immunoreactive score. Unsupervised cluster analysis was performed. The immunoreactive score was correlated to the maximum and peak standardized uptake values (SUVmax, SUVpeak) and SUVmax ratio (SUVmax of nodule/background SUVmax of contralateral, normal thyroid) of the [18F]FDG-PET/CT using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and compared between the three groups using Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: The expression of GLUT1, GLUT3, HK2, and MCT4 was strongly positively correlated with the SUVmax, SUVpeak, and SUVmax ratio. The expression of GLUT1 (p = 0.009), HK2 (p = 0.02), MCT4 (p = 0.01), and VEGF (p = 0.007) was statistically significantly different between [18F]FDG-positive benign nodules, [18F]FDG-positive thyroid carcinomas, and [18F]FDG-negative benign nodules. In both [18F]FDG-positive benign nodules and [18F]FDG-positive thyroid carcinomas, the expression of GLUT1, HK2, and MCT4 was increased as compared to [18F]FDG-negative benign nodules. VEGF expression was higher in [18F]FDG-positive thyroid carcinomas as compared to [18F]FDG-negative and [18F]FDG-positive benign nodules. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that [18F]FDG-positive benign thyroid nodules undergo changes in protein expression similar to those in thyroid carcinomas. To expand the understanding of the metabolic changes in benign and malignant thyroid nodules, further research is required, including correlation with underlying genetic alterations.
PURPOSE: The current study explored the association between 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) uptake and the quantitative expression of immunohistochemical markers related to glucose metabolism, hypoxia, and cell proliferation in benign and malignant thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology. PROCEDURES: Using a case-control design, 24 patients were selected from participants of a randomized controlled multicenter trial (NCT02208544) in which [18F]FDG-PET/CT and thyroid surgery were performed for Bethesda III and IV nodules. Three equally sized groups of [18F]FDG-positive malignant, [18F]FDG-positive benign, and [18F]FDG-negative benign nodules were included. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for glucose transporters (GLUT) 1, 3, and 4; hexokinases (HK) 1 and 2; hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF1α; monocarboxylate transporter 4 (MCT4); carbonic anhydrase IX (CA-IX); vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); sodium-iodide symporter (NIS); and Ki-67. Marker expression was scored using an immunoreactive score. Unsupervised cluster analysis was performed. The immunoreactive score was correlated to the maximum and peak standardized uptake values (SUVmax, SUVpeak) and SUVmax ratio (SUVmax of nodule/background SUVmax of contralateral, normal thyroid) of the [18F]FDG-PET/CT using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and compared between the three groups using Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: The expression of GLUT1, GLUT3, HK2, and MCT4 was strongly positively correlated with the SUVmax, SUVpeak, and SUVmax ratio. The expression of GLUT1 (p = 0.009), HK2 (p = 0.02), MCT4 (p = 0.01), and VEGF (p = 0.007) was statistically significantly different between [18F]FDG-positive benign nodules, [18F]FDG-positive thyroid carcinomas, and [18F]FDG-negative benign nodules. In both [18F]FDG-positive benign nodules and [18F]FDG-positive thyroid carcinomas, the expression of GLUT1, HK2, and MCT4 was increased as compared to [18F]FDG-negative benign nodules. VEGF expression was higher in [18F]FDG-positive thyroid carcinomas as compared to [18F]FDG-negative and [18F]FDG-positive benign nodules. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that [18F]FDG-positive benign thyroid nodules undergo changes in protein expression similar to those in thyroid carcinomas. To expand the understanding of the metabolic changes in benign and malignant thyroid nodules, further research is required, including correlation with underlying genetic alterations.
Authors: Anouk van Berkel; Jyotsna U Rao; Benno Kusters; Tuna Demir; Eric Visser; Arjen R Mensenkamp; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Egbert Oosterwijk; Jacques W M Lenders; Fred C G J Sweep; Ron A Wevers; Ad R Hermus; Johan F Langenhuijsen; Dirk P M Kunst; Karel Pacak; Martin Gotthardt; Henri J L M Timmers Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ronald Boellaard; Roberto Delgado-Bolton; Wim J G Oyen; Francesco Giammarile; Klaus Tatsch; Wolfgang Eschner; Fred J Verzijlbergen; Sally F Barrington; Lucy C Pike; Wolfgang A Weber; Sigrid Stroobants; Dominique Delbeke; Kevin J Donohoe; Scott Holbrook; Michael M Graham; Giorgio Testanera; Otto S Hoekstra; Josee Zijlstra; Eric Visser; Corneline J Hoekstra; Jan Pruim; Antoon Willemsen; Bertjan Arends; Jörg Kotzerke; Andreas Bockisch; Thomas Beyer; Arturo Chiti; Bernd J Krause Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Elizabeth J de Koster; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Adrienne H Brouwers; Eveline W C M van Dam; Lioe-Ting Dijkhorst-Oei; Adriana C H van Engen-van Grunsven; Wilbert B van den Hout; Tamira K Klooker; Romana T Netea-Maier; Marieke Snel; Wim J G Oyen; Dennis Vriens Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 10.057