Literature DB >> 3625340

Spatial scaling of central and peripheral contrast-sensitivity functions.

A Johnston.   

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity was measured as a function of spatial frequency at various eccentricities in the nasal visual field. Eccentricity influenced resolution more for vertical gratings than for horizontal ones, demonstrating a nasal field anisotropy. When grating apertures and spatial frequencies were varied together, by changing viewing distance, peripheral and central contrast-sensitivity functions could not be entirely superimposed by scaling the spatial-frequency stimulus parameter. However, when gratings apertures were designed to project a standard-sized patch on a hypothetical vertical surface at an angle of 9 deg to the line of sight, the superimposition of central and peripheral contrast-sensitivity functions improved. Central and peripheral contrast-sensitivity functions can be superimposed by describing the grating stimulus with reference to this putative surface in terms of cycles per surface distance. The surface-scaling approach leaves a minor effect of eccentricity on contrast sensitivity for vertical gratings but readily accommodates the vertical-horizontal anisotropy in grating resolution. These findings suggest a novel functional role for gradients in the spatial sampling of the visual field, in relation to the internal representation of the structure and geometry of visible surfaces.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3625340     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.4.001583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A        ISSN: 0740-3232            Impact factor:   2.129


  8 in total

1.  Functional evidence for cone-specific connectivity in the human retina.

Authors:  Chara Vakrou; David Whitaker; Paul V McGraw; Declan McKeefry
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Foveal and extra-foveal orientation discrimination.

Authors:  Sharon L Sally; Rick Gurnsey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Gambling in the visual periphery: a conjoint-measurement analysis of human ability to judge visual uncertainty.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; Camille Morvan; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Characterization of field loss based on microperimetry is predictive of face recognition difficulties.

Authors:  Thomas S A Wallis; Christopher Patrick Taylor; Jennifer Wallis; Mary Lou Jackson; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Binocular contrast summation and inhibition depends on spatial frequency, eccentricity and binocular disparity.

Authors:  Concetta F Alberti; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-09-16       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Object size determines the spatial spread of visual time.

Authors:  Corinne Fulcher; Paul V McGraw; Neil W Roach; David Whitaker; James Heron
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The spatial range of peripheral collinear facilitation.

Authors:  Marcello Maniglia; Andrea Pavan; Felipe Aedo-Jury; Yves Trotter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Subcortical Facilitation of Behavioral Responses to Threat.

Authors:  Mark D Vida; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.