Literature DB >> 3625231

Monoclonal antibody therapy in malignant melanoma: factors effecting in vivo localization.

R W Schroff, A C Morgan, C S Woodhouse, P G Abrams, M M Farrell, B E Carpenter, R K Oldham, K A Foon.   

Abstract

Thirteen patients with metastatic malignant melanoma received intravenous therapy with the murine antimelanoma monoclonal antibody 9.2.27. Five patients were entered on a dose escalation protocol with twice weekly escalating doses of 10-500 mg, in an extension of a previously reported trial. These patients demonstrated near saturation of available antibody binding sites in vivo following the 500 mg dose, with minimal toxicity. The remaining patients were entered onto a dose schedule comparison study, with a 500 mg dose administered either in a single 2 h infusion or as five daily 2 h infusions of 100 mg to examine the effects of different dose schedules and of an interrupted schedule on subsequent therapy with the same antibody. Intratumor localization of the monoclonal antibody did not appear to vary with respect to the dose schedule; however, interruption in therapy for 4 weeks was accompanied by somewhat poorer localization of antibody. This effect appeared to be primarily attributable to development of human antimurine antiglobulin in 25-30% of patients with resultant decrease in intratumor localization of antibody and more rapid clearance of the 9.2.27 antibody from the circulation. Earlier reports with other antibodies notwithstanding, initial infusions of 500 mg of 9.2.27 did not induce tolerance to the murine immunoglobulin. This study confirms and extends the findings of our initial trial of the 9.2.27 antibody by demonstrating that, although clinical responses were not observed, the antibody can be safely administered at doses up to 500 mg, with good intratumor localization of antibody. The diminished localization of antibody associated with antiglobulin responses indicates the importance of monitoring antiglobulin levels during therapy, and the necessity of controlling or preventing this phenomenon when monoclonal antibodies are administered in multiple doses as drug, toxin, or radionuclide immunoconjugates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3625231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Response Mod        ISSN: 0732-6580


  6 in total

1.  A mechanistic compartmental model for total antibody uptake in tumors.

Authors:  Greg M Thurber; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Antibody Coadministration as a Strategy to Overcome Binding-Site Barrier for ADCs: a Quantitative Investigation.

Authors:  Aman P Singh; Leiming Guo; Ashwni Verma; Gloria Gao-Li Wong; Greg M Thurber; Dhaval K Shah
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 3.  Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies in metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  T A Steffens; D F Bajorin; A N Houghton
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Key metrics to expanding the pipeline of successful antibody-drug conjugates.

Authors:  Ian Nessler; Bruna Menezes; Greg M Thurber
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 17.638

5.  Multiscale Modeling of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Connecting Tissue and Cellular Distribution to Whole Animal Pharmacokinetics and Potential Implications for Efficacy.

Authors:  Cornelius Cilliers; Hans Guo; Jianshan Liao; Nikolas Christodolu; Greg M Thurber
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Immunohistochemical phenotyping of human solid tumors with monoclonal antibodies in devising biotherapeutic strategies.

Authors:  S K Liao; C Meranda; B P Avner; T Romano; S Husseini; B Kimbro; R K Oldham
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.968

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.