Literature DB >> 36251054

Bond strength, degree of conversion, and microorganism adhesion using different bracket-to-enamel bonding protocols.

Lorena Marques Ferreira de Sena1, Dayanne Monielle Duarte Moura1,2, Isabelle Helena Gurgel de Carvalho1, Leopoldina de Fatima Dantas de Almeida3, Nathalia Ramos da Silva1, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção E Souza4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of bonding protocols and the type of orthodontic resin on the adhesion of microorganisms, degree of conversion (DC), and shear bond strength (SBS) of metallic brackets to enamel.
METHODS: A total of 60 bovine incisors were prepared and randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 10): "bonding protocol" (A: phosphoric acid; AXT: A+Transbond™ XT primer adhesive [all Transbond™ products from 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA]; and SE: Transbond™ Plus Self Etching Primer) and "orthodontic resin" (XT: Transbond™ XT adhesive paste and CC: Transbond™ Plus Color Change). After bonding, the samples were subjected to thermocycling (5000 cycles) and to the SBS test. Bond failures were classified according to the adhesive remnant index (ARI). Next, 60 enamel blocks were sterilized in ethylene oxide in order to perform the CFU (Streptococcus mutans) assay in vitro to analyze the colony forming units (CFU/mL). Then, 60 discs of each orthodontic resin were made to measure the DC. The SBS (MPa), CFU/mL, and DC (%) data were statistically analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test (5%) was performed for the DC.
RESULTS: CFU and SBS revealed no significance for all factors (P > 0.05). Tukey's test showed that A_XT (acid+Transbond™ XT adhesive paste) presented the highest DC (70.38% ± 10.5), while AXT_XT (acid+Transbond™ XT primer adhesive+Transbond™ XT adhesive paste) showed the lowest (23.47% ± 10.4). An ARI score of 2 was more frequent for the CC resin and an ARI score of 4 for the XT resin.
CONCLUSION: The CC resin does not reduce adhesion of S. mutans around orthodontic brackets and the bonding protocol did not influence the SBS, although the SE and A_XT groups contributed to a better DC.
© 2022. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilms; Dental bonding; Enamel conditioning; Orthodontic brackets; Streptococcus mutans

Year:  2022        PMID: 36251054     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-022-00430-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   2.341


  29 in total

1.  The air-abrasion technique versus the conventional acid-etching technique: A quantification of surface enamel loss and a comparison of shear bond strength.

Authors:  W L van Waveren Hogervorst; A J Feilzer; B Prahl-Andersen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Ask us. White spot lesions: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Sandra Guzmán-Armstrong; Jane Chalmers; John J Warren
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Enamel Quality after Debonding: Evaluation by Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Jorge César Borges Leão Filho; Ana Karla Souza Braz; Renato Evangelista de Araujo; Orlando Motohiro Tanaka; Matheus Melo Pithon
Journal:  Braz Dent J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

4.  Prevention of Enamel Adjacent to Bracket Demineralization Following Carbon Dioxide Laser Radiation and Titanium Tetra Fluoride Solution Treatment: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Mirhashemi; Sina Hakimi; Mohammad Sadegh Ahmad Akhoundi; Nasim Chiniforush
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-18

5.  Effect of antibacterial monomer-containing adhesive on enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets: an in-vivo study.

Authors:  Tancan Uysal; Mihri Amasyali; Suat Ozcan; Alp Erdin Koyuturk; Deniz Sagdic
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Surface morphologic evaluation of orthodontic bonding systems under conditions of cariogenic challenge.

Authors:  Erika Machado Caldeira; Vicente Telles; Claudia Trindade Mattos; Matilde da Cunha Gonçalves Nojima
Journal:  Braz Oral Res       Date:  2019-04-25

7.  Antibacterial activity of various self-etching adhesive systems against oral streptococci.

Authors:  Camila M Esteves; Claudia Ota-Tsuzuki; Andre F Reis; Jose A Rodrigues
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.440

8.  White-spot lesions during multibracket appliance treatment: A challenge for clinical excellence.

Authors:  Mahmoud Enaia; Niko Bock; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients before, during, and after orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  R G Rosenbloom; N Tinanoff
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Comparison of two methods of visual magnification for removal of adhesive flash during bracket placement using two types of orthodontic bonding agents.

Authors:  Estefania Queiroga de Santana E Alencar; Maria de Lourdes Martins Nobrega; Fabio Roberto Dametto; Patrícia Bittencourt Dutra Dos Santos; Fabio Henrique de Sá Leitão Pinheiro
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.