| Literature DB >> 36250079 |
Xueju Wang1, Luyao Li1, Pengbo Yuan1, Yangyu Zhao1, Yuan Wei1.
Abstract
Objective: This study explored the effect of fetoscopic laser surgery on the placental structure and birth-weight discordance of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS).Entities:
Keywords: anastomoses; birth-weight; fetoscopic laser surgery; placental territory; twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome
Year: 2022 PMID: 36250079 PMCID: PMC9556886 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.942816
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
FIGURE 1An image of the placenta after dye injection (A) placenta without laser surgery, red arrow, artery-artery anastomosis, black arrow, artery-vein anastomosis, blue curve, placental separate line; (B) placental with laser surgery, orange arrow, laser coagulation line.
FIGURE 2Flowcharts depicting the patient inclusion criteria.
The clinical features of TTTS patients between the two study groups.
| Category | Laser treatment ( | Control ( | |
| Age [Year, | 27 (24–38) | 29 (23–40) | 0.382 |
| Application of assisted reproductive technology [Case (%)] | 4 (12.5) | 1 (4.0) | 0.372 |
| Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy [Case (%)] | 2 (6.3) | 1 (4.0) | 1.000 |
| Gestational diabetes [Case (%)] | 4 (12.5) | 2 (8.0) | 0.686 |
| The gestational age at the first diagnosis of TTTS (± | 21.6 ± 2.8 | 27.7 ± 3.0 | < 0.001 |
|
| |||
| Stage I | 3 (9.4) | 16 (64.0) | < 0.001 |
| Stage II | 12 (37.5) | 2 (8.0) | 0.052 |
| Stage III | 10 (31.3) | 1 (4.0) | 0.064 |
| Stage IV | 7 (21.9) | 6 (24.0) | 1.000 |
| Gestational age of delivery | 33.6 ± 2.1 | 31.4 ± 2.5 | 0.001 |
| The birth weight of the recipient fetus (g) | 2076 ± 438 | 1792 ± 599 | 0.044 |
| Neonatal asphyxia [Case (%)] | 5 (15.6) | 6 (24.0) | 0.508 |
| The birth weight of the donor fetus (g) | 1645 ± 477 | 1334 ± 393 | 0.011 |
| Neonatal asphyxia [Case (%)] | 4 (12.5) | 9 (36.0) | 0.056 |
| Birth weight discordance ratio | 0.23 (0.01, 0.61) | 0.24 (0.01, 0.57) | 0.426 |
M (min–max) represent the median (minimum–maximum).
The placental characteristics of TTTS patients between the two study groups.
| Category | Laser treatment ( | Control ( | |
|
| |||
| The prevalence rate [Case (%)] | 7 (21.9) | 8 (32.0) | 0.546 |
| The total number [Count, | 1 (1,1) | 1 (1,1) | 1.000 |
| The total diameter [mm, | 3.6 (0.7,5.1) | 2.0 (0.5,5.3) | 0.094 |
|
| |||
| The prevalence rate [Case (%)] | 9 (28.1) | 24 (96.0) | < 0.001 |
| The total number [Count, | 4 (1,9) | 5 (1,13) | 0.207 |
| The total diameter [mm, | 2.1 (1.1,7.4) | 5.5 (1.3,15.3) | 0.018 |
|
| |||
| The prevalence rate [Case (%)] | 9 (28.1) | 6 (24.0) | 0.771 |
| The total number [Count, | 1 (1, 1) | 1 (1,2) | 0.607 |
| The total diameter [mm, | 3.0 (0.7,6.4) | 1.6 (1.0,6.5) | 0.955 |
| The total number of all types of anastomoses | 0 (0,11) | 6 (2,14) | < 0.001 |
| The total diameter of all types of anastomoses | 0 (0,16.8) | 6.1 (1.7,18.6) | < 0.001 |
| Placental territory discordance ratio [ | 0.39 (0.02,0.67) | 0.25 (0.02,0.75) | 0.236 |
| Velamentous umbilical insertion [Case (%)] | 6 (18.8) | 3 (12.0) | 0.717 |
| Umbilical cord insertion ratio | 0.61 ± 0.20 | 0.66 ± 0.17 | 0.377 |
| Birth weight discordant ratio/placental territory ratio | 1.55 (0.17,17.29) | 1.26 (0.03,15.17) | 0.074 |
M (min–max) represent the median (minimum–maximum), *Residual vascular anastomosis for laser-treatment group.
Correlation between birth-weight discordance ratio and the placental structure characteristics in the two study groups.
| The total diameter of AA anastomoses [mm, | The total diameter of AV anastomoses [mm, | The total diameter of VV anastomoses [mm, | Placental territory discordance ratio | Distance ratio of umbilical cordattachment points | |||
| Laser treatment group 0.23 (0.01,0.61) | Figures | 3.6 (0.7,5.1) | 2.1 (1.1,7.4) | 3.0 (0.7,6.4) | 0.39 (0.02,0.67) | 0.62 (0.15,1.00) | |
| Birth weight discordance ratio | Spearman coefficient | −0.468 | 0.248 | −0.067 | 0.556 | −0.250 | |
| 0.289 | 0.171 | 0.865 | 0.001 | 0.167 | |||
| Control group 0.24 (0.01,0.57) | Figures | 2.0 (0.5,5.3) | 5.5 (1.3,15.3) | 1.6 (1.0,6.5) | 0.25 (0.02,0.75) | 0.65 (0.38,1.00) | |
| Spearman coefficient | 0.551 | −0.085 | 0.314 | 0.329 | 0.099 | ||
| 0.157 | 0.686 | 0.544 | 0.108 | 0.638 |
M (min–max) represent the median (minimum–maximum).