| Literature DB >> 36249745 |
Zhuo Xu1, Xiang Xiang1,2, Shulan Su1, Yue Zhu1, Hui Yan1, Sheng Guo1, Jianming Guo1, Er-Xin Shang1, Dawei Qian1, Jin-Ao Duan1.
Abstract
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a common diabetic complication. Salvia miltiorrhiza has significant therapeutic effects on diabetes complications, although the mechanism remains unclear. Here, biochemical indicators and pathological changes were used to screen out the optimal Salvia miltiorrhiza multi-bioactive compounds combination. Metabolomics, transcriptomics and proteomics were used to explore the pathogenesis of DKD. RT-PCR and parallel reaction monitoring targeted quantitative proteome analysis were utilized to investigate treatment mechanisms of the optimal Salvia miltiorrhiza multi-bioactive compounds combination. The db/db mice showed biochemical abnormalities and renal lesions. The possible metabolic pathways were steroid hormone biosynthesis and sphingolipid metabolism. The 727 differential genes found in transcriptomics were associated with biochemical indicators via gene network to finally screen 11 differential genes, which were mainly key genes of TGF-β/Smad and PI3K/Akt/FoxO signaling pathways. Salvia miltiorrhiza multi-bioactive compounds combination could significantly regulate the Egr1, Pik3r3 and Col1a1 genes. 11 differentially expressed proteins involved in the two pathways were selected, of which 9 were significantly altered in db/db mice compared to db/m mice. Salvia miltiorrhiza multi-bioactive compounds combination could callback Q9DBM2, S4R1W1, Q91Y97, P47738, A8DUK4, and A2ARV4. In summary, Salvia miltiorrhiza multi-bioactive compounds combination may ameliorate kidney injury in diabetes through regulation of TGF-β/Smad and PI3K/Akt/FoxO signaling pathways.Entities:
Keywords: PI3K/Akt/FoxO signaling pathways; Salvia miltiorrhiza; diabetic kidney disease; multi-bioactive compounds combination; multi-omics
Year: 2022 PMID: 36249745 PMCID: PMC9557128 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.987668
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
FIGURE 1(A). Multi-week weight change curve (n = 10); (B). Blood glucose change curve (n = 10); (C). Determination of biochemical indicators among control group, model group and administration groups; (# p < 0.05; ## p < 0.01; ### p < 0.001: models vs. control; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001: treatment groups vs. models).
FIGURE 2(A). Pathological section of kidney tissue revealed by HE staining (×200); (B). Pathological section score; (C). Pathological section of kidney tissue revealed by PAS staining (×400); (D). Average optical (# p < 0.05; ## p < 0.01; ### p < 0.001: models vs control; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001: treatment groups vs models) (Black arrow: the cell nucleus was deep-stained or fragmented and dissolved. Red arrow: necrosis, structural disorder in the glomerular cells. Green arrow: a small amount of kidney tubular necrosis calcification. Yellow arrow: inflammatory cells in the tubulointerstitial).
FIGURE 3(A). Summary of pathway analysis with MetPA of potential metabolites in serum (S) and urine (U); (B). PLS-DA scores plots for serum (S) and urine (U) samples from models, controls and treatment group in positive and negative ion mode.
FIGURE 4The differentially expressed genes in the control and model groups of MA map (A), volcano map (B) and heat map (C). Analysis result of GO (D) between the control and model groups. KEGG enrichment (E) of the control and model groups.
FIGURE 5(A,B). Power value filtering based on network; (C). Genetic module classification; (D). Heat map of correlation between module and biochemical index (”***”: p < 0.001; “**”: 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01; “*”: 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05; “.”: 0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.1; P>0.1, it will not be displayed); (E). Relative expression of candidate genes different groups of samples (# p < 0.05; ## p < 0.01; ### p < 0.001: models vs control; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001: treatment groups vs. models). Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR validation of candidate genes.
Candidate genes.
| gene_id | baseMean | baseMean_control_Control | baseMean_case_Model | Fold change | log2FoldChange | P val | P adj | Up/Down | Control | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egr1 | 629.8171 | 231.0385 | 1028.596 | 4.452053 | 2.154471 | 0.040332 | 0.240131 | Up | 4.06 ± 1.43 | 19.32 ± 13.64 |
| Foxo3 | 2129.619 | 1566.554 | 2692.684 | 1.718859 | 0.781451 | 4.47E−07 | 2.89E−05 | Up | 11.74 ± 1.62 | 21.17 ± 3.1 |
| Pik3r3 | 422.1827 | 270.857 | 573.5083 | 2.117384 | 1.082283 | 1.33E−09 | 1.62E−07 | Up | 2.14 ± 0.24 | 4.73 ± 0.67 |
| Fgf1 | 3978.509 | 5919.504 | 2037.514 | 0.344203 | -1.53867 | 6.89E−25 | 5.84E−22 | Down | 40.84 ± 3.96 | 14.7 ± 1.45 |
| Sost | 42.59663 | 13.75403 | 71.43923 | 5.19406 | 2.376863 | 0.000292 | 0.006904 | Up | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 1.75 ± 0.88 |
| Wnt10a | 25.99778 | 5.397115 | 46.59845 | 8.633956 | 3.110022 | 1.55E−09 | 1.84E−07 | Up | 0.18 ± 0.04 | 1.6 ± 0.36 |
| Tgif2 | 34.24088 | 22.41959 | 46.06217 | 2.05455 | 1.038822 | 0.009295 | 0.090277 | Up | 0.19 ± 0.08 | 0.4 ± 0.09 |
| Akt2 | 1636.926 | 1752.81 | 1521.042 | 0.867773 | -0.20461 | 0.18374 | 0.566908 | Down | 14.89 ± 1.27 | 13.66 ± 0.89 |
| Mep1b | 1186.108073 | 1815.089162 | 557.126985 | 0.306941938 | -1.703962318 | 3.32E-14 | 1.00E−11 | Down | 32.73 ± 5.51 | 10.42 ± 0.59 |
| Col1a1 | 283.145249 | 157.3987414 | 408.8917565 | 2.597808297 | 1.377294972 | 0.031493193 | 0.205445201 | Up | 1.34 ± 0.43 | 3.8 ± 1.95 |
| Apoe | 7173.173801 | 3315.058638 | 11031.28897 | 3.327630118 | 1.73449508 | 2.12E-05 | 0.000800668 | Up | 103.07 ± 13.9 | 359.13 ± 101.38 |
Candidate genes validation.
| Gene | FC-Value con vs. MDL | P-Value con vs. MDL |
|---|---|---|
| Egr1 | 3.822322 | 0.175687 |
| Foxo3 | 1.599497 | 0.00031 |
| Pik3r3 | 1.551625 | 0.002654 |
| Fgf1 | 0.295552 | 0.018858 |
| Sost | 2.850806 | 0.065136 |
| Wnt10a | 4.653438 | 0.014783 |
| Tgif2 | 1.6666 | 0.060593 |
| Akt2 | 0.75556 | 0.084682 |
| Mep1b | 0.293199 | 0.010849 |
| Col1a1 | 2.293331 | 0.159263 |
| Apoe | 2.54738 | 0.105881 |
Regulation of multi-bioactive compounds combination on differential candidate genes.
| Gene | FC-Value | P-Value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDL vs. MH | MDL vs. TJH | MDL vs. VGH | MDL vs. MH | MDL vs. TJH | MDL vs. VGH | |
| Egr1 | 0.705968 | 0.549043 | 0.500241 | 0.518296 | 0.341142 | 0.303367 |
| Foxo3 | 0.851511 | 1.1245 | 0.877599 | 0.002549 | 0.072078 | 0.316091 |
| Pik3r3 | 1.299359 | 0.744304 | 0.82166 | 0.075605 | 0.005148 | 0.020719 |
| Fgf1 | 1.482029 | 1.283115 | 1.061877 | 0.011011 | 0.251666 | 0.665722 |
| Sost | 0.627235 | 0.782331 | 0.871475 | 0.272875 | 0.340254 | 0.554061 |
| Wnt10a | 1.577122 | 0.736772 | 0.95392 | 0.148055 | 0.224915 | 0.848578 |
| Tgif2 | 1.033512 | 0.884769 | 0.956578 | 0.821024 | 0.614892 | 0.803241 |
| Akt2 | 1.143723 | 1.007503 | 1.04592 | 0.014682 | 0.784118 | 0.471872 |
| Mep1b | 2.069585 | 0.929148 | 0.927403 | 0.104949 | 0.471726 | 0.479246 |
| Col1a1 | 0.870926 | 0.478604 | 0.642959 | 0.686801 | 0.184324 | 0.416325 |
| Apoe | 1.287144 | 0.84279 | 1.163685 | 0.318679 | 0.545231 | 0.678083 |
Relative quantitative results of target proteins.
| Protein ID | Protein | Gene | Fold change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDL/CON | MH/MDL | TJH/MDL | VGH/MDL | MH/TJH | MH/VGH | |||
| A0A087WS56 | Fibronectin | Fn1 | 1.10 | 1.49 | 1.17 | 0.64 | 1.27 | 2.31 |
| A2ARV4 | Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 2 | Lrp2 | 1.21 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.74 | 1.02 | 1.30 |
| A8DUK4 | Beta-globin | Hbb-bs | 1.12 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.62 | 1.09 | 1.62 |
| P09411 | Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 | Pgk1 | 1.03 | 0.94 | 1.03 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 1.12 |
| P26443 | Glutamate dehydrogenase 1, mitochondrial | Glud1 | 2.12 | 0.77 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.79 | 0.82 |
| P47738 | Aldehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial | Aldh2 | 1.31 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 1.06 | 1.08 |
| P52503 | NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron-sulfur protein 6, mitochondrial | Ndufs6 | 1.28 | 0.86 | 1.05 | 0.94 | 0.82 | 0.92 |
| Q91VB8 | Alpha globin 1 | Hba-a1 | 1.07 | 1.15 | 1.12 | 0.72 | 1.02 | 1.59 |
| Q91Y97 | Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase B | Aldob | 1.14 | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 1.11 |
| Q9DBM2 | Peroxisomal bifunctional enzyme | Ehhadh | 0.33 | 0.89 | 1.09 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 1.02 |
| S4R1W1 | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | Gm3839 | 1.08 | 1.11 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 1.10 | 1.45 |
FIGURE 6Quantitative comparison of target proteins. (ns: P > 0.05, not significant; # p < 0.05; ## p < 0.01; ### p < 0.001: models vs. control; *:p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001; ****: p < 0.0001)
FIGURE 7Molecular mechanism of multi-bioactive compounds combination from Salvia miltiorrhiza to improve DKD. (The red arrows represent changes in db/db model mice).