| Literature DB >> 36248928 |
Weiyu Fu1,2, Lixia Wang3,4.
Abstract
Considering that in the process of job scheduling, the cluster load should be prebalanced rather than remedied when the load is seriously unbalanced; therefore, in this paper, the task scheduling flow of the Hadoop cluster is analyzed deeply. On the Hadoop platform, a self-dividing algorithm is proposed for load balancing. An intelligent optimization algorithm is used to solve load balance. A dynamic feedback load balancing scheduling method is proposed from the point of view of task scheduling. In order to solve the shortcoming of the fair scheduling algorithm, this paper proposes two ways to improve the resource utilization and overall performance of Hadoop. When the mapping task is completed and the tasks to be reduced are assigned, the task assignment is based on the performance of the nodes to be reduced. It gives full play to the advantages of the ant colony algorithm and the hive colony algorithm so that the fusion algorithm can better deal with load balance. Then, three existing scheduling algorithms are introduced in detail: single queue scheduling, capacity scheduling, and fair scheduling. On this basis, an improved task scheduling strategy based on genetic algorithm is proposed to allocate and execute application tasks to reduce task completion time. The experiment verifies the effectiveness of the algorithm. The LBNP algorithm greatly improves the efficiency of reducing task execution and job execution. The delay capacity scheduling algorithm can ensure that most tasks can achieve localization scheduling, improve resource utilization, improve load balance, and speed up job completion time.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36248928 PMCID: PMC9568311 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1545024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Hadoop map reduce calculation model.
Figure 2Average response time of each node in a single test.
Figure 3REST-map reduce framework architecture.
Figure 4Evaluation model.
Figure 5Map reduce calculation process.
Figure 6Individual fitness probability and selected random number.
Figure 7Node load evaluation.