| Literature DB >> 36248558 |
Hind Alfadda1, Muhammad Afzaal2, Hassan Mahdi1, Rasha Alaudan1, Samantha Curle3.
Abstract
This study makes an original contribution to knowledge by investigating the impact of Just-in-Time (JiT) teaching and peer instruction (PI) strategies on the promotion of students' achievement, interaction, and motivation in English language learning. Students were recruited from an undergraduate TESOL program in the first semester of 2019 at a University in Saudi Arabia. A multiple method research design was used to address the research questions robustly and rigorously. First, a two-group quasi-experimental design was implemented. In the first group, a lecture-based strategy was used (n = 28), while in the second group, JiT and PI strategies were used (n = 27) in English language lessons. An innovative research method was used in this study: a private Instagram account was created, serving as a platform through which teacher and students could communicate using interactive posts and comments. Second, students filled out a survey reflecting on this medium of language teaching and learning. Finally, focus group interviews were conducted to determine students' views on the use of Instagram as an educational tool in terms of its flexibility and usefulness. The findings of the study suggest that JiT teaching, and PI promoted students' achievement and enhanced students' motivation, particularly in relation to fluency and novelty in the second language. Furthermore, students viewed Instagram as a successful educational tool that significantly facilitated their collaboration. Nevertheless, this study also highlights the challenges of using JiT teaching and PI to facilitate language learning. Suggestions for practitioners are specified; including providing adequate e-learning tools for students to enhance language learning motivation and achievement.Entities:
Keywords: Instagram and; Just-in-Time; Snapchat stories; language acquisition; peer instruction; psychological motivation
Year: 2022 PMID: 36248558 PMCID: PMC9559734 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866354
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Perceived advantages and disadvantages of using Instagram to learn English.
| Advantages | Disadvantages | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Readily available. | Lack of privacy. |
| 2 | Affordable. | Academic use may inhibit personal use. |
| 3 | Allows one to become immersed in an English language environment. | The information posted on Instagram may contain spelling and grammatical errors. |
| 4 | Provides an informal learning context. | Learning experiences based on Instagram may be too informal or unstructured. |
| 5 | Provides an opportunity to use the language in an authentic manner. | |
| 6 | Increases interest in learning English. | |
| 7 | Increases motivation to read English materials. |
Adapted from Aloraini and Cardoso (2018); Gonulal (2019); Yeh and Mitric (2019).
Figure 1Stages of data collection.
Reliability statistics.
| Cronbach’s Alpha | Cronbach’s Alpha based on standardized items |
|
|---|---|---|
| 0.885 | 0.910 | 25 |
Paired samples t-test for the control group.
| Test |
| Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pretest | 28 | 27.71 | 5.47 |
| Post-test | 28 | 28.34 | 4.91 |
Results of the t-test between the pretest scores (M = 27.71, SD = 5.47) and the post-test scores (M = 28.34, SD = 4.91); t(27) = 6.1093, p = 1.587−6. p < 0.05.
Paired samples t-test for the experimental group.
| Test |
| Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pretest | 27 | 27.19 | 5.23 |
| Post-test | 27 | 38.44 | 4.89 |
Results of the t-test between the pretest scores (M = 27.19, SD = 5.23) and the post-test scores (M = 38.44, SD = 4.91); t(26) = 7.6588, p = 3.966−8. p < 0.05.
Figure 2Control group pre- and post-test scores.
Figure 3Comparison of control and experimental groups pre- and post-test scores.
Independent samples t-test between conditions (control and experimental) post-test.
| Conditions |
| Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 28 | 34.86 | 4.91 |
| Experimental | 27 | 38.44 | 4.89 |
Statistical average of the responses regarding the use of Instagram.
| Item | Statement | % agreement | Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I love to read from Instagram rather than the book. | 76% | 3.21 | 0.82 |
| 2 | Reading my friends’ comments has helped support my understanding. | 93% | 3.52 | 0.63 |
| 3 | Reading my friends’ comments makes the topic more authentic. | 93% | 3.28 | 0.59 |
| 4 | I would rather do my reading assignment from Instagram than from the book. | 83% | 3.48 | 0.74 |
| 5 | I like to discuss my point of view with my friends in the comments section. | 97% | 3.45 | 0.57 |
| 6 | I like to discuss the posted pictures in a written form rather than an oral form. | 79% | 3.93 | 0.68 |
| 7 | My friends’ comments enhance my vision of the topic. | 100% | 3.41 | 0.50 |
| 8 | I like to discuss our written comments in the classroom with my classmates. | 100% | 3.41 | 0.50 |
| 9 | I enjoy debating opinions with my classmates in the comments section. | 97% | 3.38 | 0.56 |
| 10 | Writing my opinions in the comments section helps me to think carefully about how to express my ideas clearly. | 100% | 3.76 | 0.44 |
| 11 | Discussions in the comments section help me gain new perspectives about the topic. | 100% | 3.48 | 0.51 |
| 12 | Face-to-face discussions about the topics shared on Instagram help clear up any misunderstandings that I may have. | 86% | 3.41 | 0.73 |
| 13 | After the class ended, I continued to think about my written comments. | 86% | 3.00 | 0.53 |
| 14 | I still like to play Instagram stories even after the class has ended. | 86% | 3.14 | 0.69 |
| 15 | After the class, Instagram helped me to think about the discussions held in the classroom. | 97% | 3.28 | 0.53 |
| 16 | After the class, the Instagram posts helped me reconsider and develop my ideas and thoughts. | 100% | 3.48 | 0.51 |
| 17 | Instagram helped me to think outside the box. | 93% | 3.34 | 0.61 |
| 18 | I like using Instagram in learning because it allows me to access learning materials any time during the day. | 86% | 3.45 | 0.74 |
| 19 | I like using the emojis in the comments section instead of writing. | 79% | 3.24 | 0.79 |
| 20 | Instagram is easy to use. | 100% | 3.90 | 0.31 |
| 21 | The informal atmosphere of Instagram makes it enjoyable and more flexible to learn. | 97% | 3.59 | 0.57 |
Figure 4Students’ actual responses in class on Instagram.
Correlations among the categories of the questionnaire.
| Pre-class teaching | Active learning | Reflection | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active learning | Pearson Correlation | 0.267 | ||
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.178 | |||
| Reflection | Pearson Correlation | 0.747 | 0.518 | |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.006 | ||
| Usability and flexibility of Instagram | Pearson Correlation | 0.111 | 0.456 | 0.373 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.582 | 0.017 | 0.055 | |
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).