| Literature DB >> 36248529 |
Qingyu Zhang1, Mudassir Husnain2, Muhammad Usman2, Muhammad Waheed Akhtar2,3, Saqib Ali3, Mussadiq Ali Khan4, Qamar Abbas2,5, Riffat Ismail6, Tayyab Rehman6, Muhammad Akram6.
Abstract
Climate change has increasingly been recognised and associated with consumer behaviour: Practitioners are developing their strategies to reduce environmental degradation while increasing the management of sustainable consumption; it needs to better understand consumer attitudes and eco-friendly factors about the issue. Therefore, the current study focused to understand the effects of pro-environmental factors on individuals' environmental attitudes (purchase behaviour towards products with recycled packaging) through the lens of theory of planned behaviour in a cross-cultural setting. Moreover, present research focuses on the moderating role that religiosity plays in causal pathways between certain determinants (attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control) and intentions in this context. A multi-wave time-lagged research design was employed in this study, and university students from two developing countries were surveyed (N = 324, 266). The findings revealed pronounced similarities between the two examined countries. Overwhelmingly, pro-environmental factors examined (environmental values, environmental knowledge, and environmental concern) were found to be positively related to attitude formation. Further results showed that attitude and subjective norms are significant predictors of the intention to purchase products with recycled packaging. Moreover, with the exception of perceived behavioural control, religiosity moderates the relationships between all the determinants of TPB and intention to purchase recycled packaged products. Present study offers insightful implications to management of these emerging and/or similar cultural markets regarding customer value for green products. Using TPB, present study broadened and deepen extant stream of literature on consumption of recycled packaged products in two highly emerging markets; Pakistan and Malaysia.Entities:
Keywords: cross cultural; pro-environmental factors; products with recycled packaging; religiosity; theory of planned behaviour
Year: 2022 PMID: 36248529 PMCID: PMC9557231 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840711
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Theoretical framework of the study.
Demographics of the respondents.
| Characteristics | Total Sample | Pakistan | Malaysia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||
| Male | 291 | 161 | 130 |
| Female | 162 | 98 | 64 |
| Age | |||
| 18–22 Years | 129 | 89 | 40 |
| 23–26 Years | 174 | 83 | 91 |
| 27–30 Years | 95 | 49 | 46 |
| > 30 Years | 55 | 26 | 29 |
| Income | |||
| 1–20,000 PKR | 127 | 58 | 69 |
| 20,001–40,000 PKR | 189 | 72 | 117 |
| 40,001–60,000 PKR | 79 | 31 | 48 |
| > 60,000 PKR | 58 | 16 | 42 |
| Qualifications | |||
| Undergraduate | 202 | 121 | 81 |
| Master | 162 | 84 | 78 |
| M.Phil. & above | 89 | 38 | 51 |
Income in Malaysian currency is converted to Pak Rs.
Results regarding discriminant validity: aggregate.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. INT(T2) | (0.741) | ||||||||
| 2. ENC(T1) | 0.258 | (0.863) | |||||||
| 3. ENK(T1) | 0.531 | 0.356 | (0.779) | ||||||
| 4. ENV(T1) | 0.176 | 0.184 | 0.386 | (0.680) | |||||
| 5. ATT(T1) | 0.394 | 0.298 | 0.415 | 0.209 | (0.702) | ||||
| 6. SN(T1) | 0.278 | 0.368 | 0.298 | 0.189 | 0.388 | (0.892) | |||
| 7.PBC(T1) | 0.179 | 0.207 | 0.190 | 0.302 | 0.201 | 0.289 | (0.731) | ||
| 8.REL(T2) | 0.278 | 0.498 | 0.283 | 0.491 | 0.245 | 0.489 | 0.426 | (0.720) | |
| 9.BEH(T3) | 0.173 | 0.287 | 0.389 | 0.315 | 0.278 | 0.308 | 0.288 | 0.387 | (0.825) |
N = 453; T = Time; the values in brackets are the square roots of the (AVE).
Results of the model comparison (Pakistan and Malaysia).
| Model | χ2/Df | RMR | GFI | CFI | RMSEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypothesized model | 1.57/1.73 | 0.04/0.05 | 0.94/0.89 | 0.88/0.85 | 0.04/0.05 |
| Three-factor modela | 14.9/9.45 | 0.14/0.19 | 0.53/0.51 | 0.59/0.68 | 0.02/0.03 |
| Three-factor modelb | 11.5/9.02 | 0.16/0.23 | 0.55/0.68 | 0.61/0.50 | 0.12/0.14 |
| Three-factor modelc | 8.01/7.53 | 0.15/0.21 | 0.65/0.60 | 0.54/0.62 | 0.39/0.82 |
| Three-factor modeld | 24.1/15.6 | 0.23/0.22 | 0.45/0.52 | 0.61/0.57 | 0.13/0.14 |
| Single-factor model | 34.2/28.5 | 0.13/0.06 | 0.22/0.31 | 0.33/0.39 | 0.37/0.16 |
Data from Pakistan and Malaysia were examined in this analysis; aattitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, and religiosity were combined in a model; battitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, and intentions were combined in a model; creligiosity and intentions were combined in a model; dintentions and behaviour were combined in a model; N = 453; RMR, Root mean square residual; GFI, Goodness of fit index; CFI, Comparative fit index; and RMSEA, Root mean square error of approximation.
Results regarding the main effects and the moderated regression analyses.
| Criterion | Predictors | Hypothesis |
| Pakistan path coefficient |
| Malaysia path coefficient | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EN | ENV(T1) | H1(a) | 0.41 | 0.17 | 0.39 | 0.11 | |
| Attitude(T1) | ENK(T1) | H1(b) | 0.44 | 0.26 | |||
| ENC(T1) | H1(c) | 0.31 | 0.17 | ||||
| Intentions(T) | Attitude(T1) | H2 | 0.26 | 0.59 | 0.21 | 0.55 | |
| SN(T1) | H3 | 0.28 | 0.22 | ||||
| PBC(T1) | H4 | n.s. | n.s. | ||||
| Behaviour(T3) | Intentions(T2) | H5 | 0.62 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.39 | |
| Criterion | C.R |
| Estimate Pak | C.R |
| Estimate MY | |
| ZINT | ZATT | 4.62 | 0.42 | 0.13 | 3.43 | 0.33 | 0.26 |
| REL_ × _ATT | 5.45(H6) | 0.22 | 4.73 | 0.14 | |||
| REL_ × _SN | 4.69(H7) | 0.19 | 4.26 | 0.10 | |||
| ZSN | 6.56 | 0.33 | 5.70 | 0.45 | |||
| ZREL | 5.02 | 0.48 | 6.33 | 0.25 | |||
| ZPBC | 1.03 | n.s. | n.s | n.s | |||
| REL_x_PBC | 0.78(H8) | n.s. | n.s | n.s |
N = 310 (Pak); 143(MY). EN = Environment; ENV = Environmental values; ENK = Environmental knowledge; ENC = Environmental concern; PBC = perceived behavioural control; SN=Subjective norms; and REL = Religiosity. Significance (two-tailed test):
p < 0.001;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.05.
Figure 2Moderator Interactions i.e. Religiosity x Attitude, Religiosity x SN, Religiosity x PBC.
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| EV1: “The balance of nature is very delicate and easily upset” | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.70 | 0.74 | ||
| EV2: “Humans must live in harmony with nature in order to survive” | 0.73 | 0.75 | |||||||
| EV3: “Mankind was created to rule over the rest of nature” | 0.67 | 0.79 | |||||||
| EV4: “Humans have the right to modify the natural environment to suit their needs” | 0.82 | 0.63 | |||||||
|
| EK1: “Most smog in our big cities comes from industrial plants.” | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.85 | 0.72 | 0.67 | ||
| EK2:“Unacceptable levels of mercury have been found in seafood.” | 0.78 | 0.89 | |||||||
| EK3: “Diesel fuel generates less pollution than unleaded fuel.” | 0.65 | 0.84 | |||||||
| EK4: “Ecology assumes that man is an integral part of nature.” | |||||||||
| EK5: “Aluminium takes longer to decompose than iron or steel.” | |||||||||
| EK6: “Traditional plastic bags do not decompose in landfills.” | 0.81 | 0.66 | |||||||
| EK7: “Products do not use any electricity in sleep mode.” | 0.69 | 0.58 | |||||||
| EK8: “Most of the water in the country is used in agriculture.” | 0.62 | 0.54 | |||||||
|
| EC1: “I would say that I am emotionally involved in environmental protection.” | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 0.64 | ||
| EC2: “I am worried about the worsening quality of the environment.” | 0.68 | 0.71 | |||||||
| EC3: “I think about how the environment’s quality can be improved.” | 0.65 | 0.64 | |||||||
|
| A1: “Generally, buying recycled packaged goods is a better choice.” | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.69 | ||
| A2: “In terms of price, I prefer products with recycled packaging.” | 0.72 | 0.68 | |||||||
| A3: “I like shopping for products with recycled packaging.” | 0.65 | 0.59 | |||||||
| A4: “Buying products with recycled packaging generally benefits consumers.” | 0.67 | 0.83 | |||||||
| A5: “There’s nothing wrong with purchasing products with recycled packaging.” | 0.71 | 0.63 | |||||||
|
| SN1: “Neighbours expect me to purchase products with recycled packaging.” | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.51 | 0.60 | ||
| SN2: “Family expects me to purchase products with recycled packaging.” | 0.68 | 0.60 | |||||||
|
| PBC1: “Choosing to buy products that are in recycled packages helps to solve environmental problems.” | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.67 | ||
| PBC2: “The impact of package recycling is lower than the impacts of other measures used to mitigate the solid waste problem.” | 0.79 | 0.60 | |||||||
| PBC3: “Sorting waste and disposing of it in recycling bins is something that requires work, and it does not solve waste problems.” | 0.77 | 0.57 | |||||||
|
| R1: “In my personal life, religion is very important.” | 0.55 | 0.78 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.58 | ||
| R2: “Islam helps me have a better life.” | 0.67 | 0.57 | |||||||
| R3: “The Dua’aa (supplication) supports me.” | 0.62 | 0.70 | |||||||
| R4: “The Prophet Muhammad (peace-be-upon-him) is a role model for me.” | 0.73 | 0.59 | |||||||
| R5: “Performing Hajj is one of my main priorities.” | 0.70 | 0.61 | |||||||
| R6: “I believe that Allah (God) helps me.” | 0.69 | 0.76 | |||||||
| R7: “I perform all my prayers.” | 0.51 | 0.63 | |||||||
| R8: “I always perform my prayers on time.” | 0.65 | 0.83 | |||||||
| R9: “I perform my daily prayers in the mosque regularly.” | 0.67 | 0.73 | |||||||
| R10: “I perform the obligation of Zakat.” | 0.71 | 0.53 | |||||||
| R11: “I read the Qur’an regularly.” | 0.61 | 0.69 | |||||||
| R12: “I fast the whole month of Ramadan.” | 0.54 | 0.68 | |||||||
|
| PB1: “When shopping, I deliberately check products for environmentally harmful ingredients.” | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.56 | 0.61 | ||
| PB2: “When shopping, I deliberately choose products with environmentally friendly packaging.” | 0.63 | 0.54 | |||||||
| PB3: “I prefer to buy sustainable products even if they are more expensive than others.” | 0.56 | 0.60 | |||||||
| PB4: “While shopping, I look for environmental and fair trade labels before buying products.” | 0.70 | 0.67 | |||||||
|
| BI1: “I intend to buy certain products because they are less polluting.” | 0.62 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.61 | 0.59 | ||
| BI2: “I intend to switch to other brands for ecological reasons.” | 0.59 | 0.78 | BI3: I want to buy recycled products in my coming shopping. | 0.73 | 0.65 | ||||