| Literature DB >> 36248504 |
Ying Yan1,2, Wenfang Fan3, Bingjia Shao3,4, Yuanyang Lei2.
Abstract
A higher level of intelligence can improve adolescents' interactions with intelligent online services, although overemphasizing intelligent online services may nullify their sense of autonomy and in turn affect their acceptance intention. Enterprises have therefore focused on the best ways through which to provide intelligent online services. Based on the technology acceptance model, this study constructs a theoretical model of the impact of perceived control and power on adolescents' acceptance intention of intelligent services. Through a scenario experiment involving an intelligent online recommendation service, 195 participants were obtained to test the model. The results show that the adolescents' perceived control affects their acceptance intention of intelligent online services through their perceived usefulness. The adolescents' sense of power moderates the influence of perceived control on perceived usefulness. This study supplements the research on intelligent online services and provides a reference for online merchants seeking to design such service processes.Entities:
Keywords: acceptance intention; adolescent; intelligent service; perceived control; perceived usefulness; sense of power
Year: 2022 PMID: 36248504 PMCID: PMC9559805 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1013436
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Research model.
Figure 2Experimental scenario of the number of recommended options 3. Images source from: m.qunar.com. Reproduced with permission.
Figure 3Experimental scenario of the number of recommended options 1. Images sourced from: m.qunar.com. Reproduced with permission.
Test for reliability and validity.
| Variables | Items | Mean | SD | FL | Alpha | CR | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived control (PC) | PC1 | 4.86 | 1.332 | 0.886 | 0.907 | 0.936 | 0.785 |
| PC2 | 4.90 | 1.229 | 0.912 | ||||
| PC3 | 4.99 | 1.181 | 0.904 | ||||
| PC4 | 5.02 | 1.072 | 0.842 | ||||
| Perceived usefulness (PU) | PU1 | 4.98 | 0.887 | 0.858 | 0.874 | 0.914 | 0.727 |
| PU2 | 4.96 | 0.942 | 0.860 | ||||
| PU3 | 5.01 | 0.918 | 0.827 | ||||
| PU4 | 4.98 | 0.951 | 0.865 | ||||
| Acceptance intention (AI) | AI 1 | 4.88 | 0.980 | 0.885 | 0.819 | 0.895 | 0.741 |
| AI 2 | 4.69 | 1.010 | 0.888 | ||||
| AI 3 | 4.73 | 1.133 | 0.806 | ||||
| Sense of power (SP) | SP1 | 4.55 | 1.078 | 0.769 | 0.709 | 0.861 | 0.610 |
| SP2 | 4.21 | 1.113 | 0.865 | ||||
| SP3 | 4.20 | 1.211 | 0.722 | ||||
| SP4 | 5.19 | 1.107 | 0.759 |
Correlation coefficient matrix.
| Variables | PC | PU | AI | SP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC | 0.886 | |||
| PU | 0.806 | 0.852 | ||
| AI | 0.678 | 0.790 | 0.860 | |
| SP | 0.488 | 0.542 | 0.533 | 0.781 |
The value on the diagonal is the square root of AVE, and other data are the correlation coefficients between the corresponding variables.
Manipulation check results for perceived control.
| Group | N | Mean | SD | SE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low perceived control | 64 | 4.156 | 0.797 | 0.099 |
| High perceived control | 64 | 5.727 | 0.640 | 0.080 |
Figure 4Acceptance intention under different levels of perceived control.
Core path testing.
| Paths | Coefficients | SD | T | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived control –> Perceived usefulness | 0.593 | 0.039 | 15.173 | 0.000 |
| Perceived usefulness –> Acceptance intention | 0.895 | 0.062 | 14.449 | 0.000 |
| Perceived control –> Perceived usefulness –> Acceptance intention | 0.784 | 0.104 | 7.550 | 0.000 |
Figure 5Moderating effect test of sense of power.