| Literature DB >> 36248423 |
Jirui Lang1,2,3, Li Li2,3, Shilong Chen2,3, Yunyun Quan2,3, Jing Yi2,3, Jin Zeng2,3, Yong Li4, Junning Zhao1,2,3, Zhujun Yin2,3.
Abstract
Background: Gout is a common crystal-related arthritis caused by the deposition of monosodium urates (MSU). Tibetan medicine Wuwei Shexiang Pills (WSP) has been demonstrated to exhibit anti-inflammatory, antihyperuricemia, and antigout activities. However, the underlying mechanism is unknown.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36248423 PMCID: PMC9568303 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2377692
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
All herbal ingredients of WSP.
| Chinese name | Latin name | Marker |
|---|---|---|
| Zang Chang Pu |
| ZCP |
| He Zi |
| HZ |
| Mu Xiang |
| MX |
| She Xiang (artificial Moschus in English) | Not applicable | SX |
| Tie Bang Chui |
| TBC |
Figure 1Workflow graph of this study.
Figure 2In vitro experiment protocol.
Primers used for qRT-PCR.
| Gene | Forward sequence (5′–3′) | Reverse sequence (5′–3′) |
|---|---|---|
| IL-6 | CACTGGTCTTTTGGAGTTTGAG | GGACTTTTGTACTCATCTGCAC |
| IL-1 | GCCAGTGAAATGATGGCTTATT | AGGAGCACTTCATCTGTTTAGG |
| TNF- | AGCCCTGGTATGAGCCCATCTATC | TCCCAAAGTAGACCTGCCCAGAC |
| IL-18 | GCTGAAGATGATGAAAACCTGG | CAAATAGAGGCCGATTTCCTTG |
| NLRP3 | AGGGATGAGAGTGTTGTGTGAAACG | GCTTCTGGTTGCTGCTGAGGAC |
|
| AATCTGGCACCACACCTTCTACAA | GGATAGCACAGCCTGGATAGCAA |
Figure 3(a) Venn diagram. The value demonstrated the number of shared and unique targets of WSP and gout. (b) A total of 8 modules have been found in the PPI network. The color depths of nodes are positively correlated with their degrees. The size and color depths of edges are positively correlated with the interaction degree of the two nodes.
The function description of the PPI network.
| GO | Description | −Log10(P) |
|---|---|---|
| GO:0002521 | Leukocyte differentiation | 23.16 |
| GO:0001819 | Positive regulation of cytokine production | 22.42 |
| GO:0032496 | Response to lipopolysaccharide | 18.96 |
| GO:0022409 | Positive regulation of cell-cell adhesion | 18.13 |
| GO:0050727 | Regulation of inflammatory response | 17.73 |
Figure 4(a) GO biological processes of WSP against gout. (b) KEGG enrichment analysis results. The color scale represented the –Log10 (p value), and the dot size indicated the gene count in each term. (c) The ingredient-target-pathway network. The different colors indicated the different ingredients of herbs. The size of nodes was positively correlated with their degrees. The bigger the nodes are, the more important they were.
Targets-pathways enrichment results.
| GO | Pathway | Log10(P) | Targets |
|---|---|---|---|
| ko04668 | TNF signaling pathway | −14.52 | CSF2, FOS, IL1B, JUN, LTA, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, MAPK3, PTGS2, CCL2, CCL5, TNF, VCAM1, RIPK1 |
| hsa04066 | HIF-1 signaling pathway | −13.92 | BCL2, EPO, GAPDH, IFNG, IGF1R, INS, INSR, NOS2, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PRKCA, MAPK3, RPS6KB1, STAT3 |
| ko04630 | Jak-STAT signaling pathway | −3.56 | BCL2, CSF2, EPO, IFNG, IL4, IL6ST, IL10, IL13, JAK3, LEP, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PTPN6, STAT3, STAT5A |
| hsa05163 | Human cytomegalovirus infection | −13.10 | CALR, IL1B, ITGB3, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PRKCA, MAPK3, PTGER1, PTGS2, RNASE1, RPS6KB1, CCL2, CCL5, SRC, STAT3, TNF, RIPK1 |
| ko04657 | IL-17 signaling pathway | −12.49 | CSF2, FOS, IFNG, IL1B, IL4, IL13, JUN, MAPK3, PTGS2, S100A9, CCL2, TNF |
| ko04152 | AMPK signaling pathway | −12.49 | FBP1, HNF4A, IGF1R, INS, INSR, LEP, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PPARG, RPS6KB1, SCD, ADIPOQ, SIRT1 |
| ko04060 | Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction | −12.26 | CSF2, EPO, IFNG, IL1B, IL4, IL6ST, IL10, IL13, KIT, LEP, LTA, PF4, CCL2, CCL5, TGFB1, TNF, TNFSF11 |
| ko04659 | Th17 cell differentiation | −11.75 | FOS, IFNG, IL1B, IL4, IL6ST, JAK3, JUN, MAPK3, STAT3, STAT5A, TGFB1, FOXP3 |
| hsa04380 | Osteoclast differentiation | −11.66 | FOS, IFNG, IL1B, ITGB3, JUN, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PPARG, MAPK3, RNASE1, TGFB1, TNF, TNFSF11 |
| ko05321 | Inflammatory bowel disease | −11.28 | IFNG, IL1B, IL4, IL10, IL13, JUN, STAT3, TGFB1, TNF, FOXP3 |
| ko05323 | Rheumatoid arthritis | −11.23 | CSF2, FOS, IFNG, IL1B, ITGB2, JUN, CCL2, CCL5, TGFB1, TNF, TNFSF11 |
| hsa04917 | Prolactin signaling pathway | −10.64 | CYP17A1, FOS, INS, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, MAPK3, SRC, STAT3, STAT5A, TNFSF11 |
| ko04660 | T Cell receptor signaling pathway | −10.57 | CSF2, FOS, IFNG, IL4, IL10, JUN, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, MAPK3, PTPN6, TNF |
| hsa01521 | EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance | −10.41 | BCL2, FGFR2, IGF1R, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PRKCA, MAPK3, RPS6KB1, SRC, STAT3 |
| hsa04015 | Rap1 signaling pathway | −10.04 | ACTB, FGFR2, IGF1R, INS, INSR, ITGB2, ITGB3, KIT, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PRKCA, MAPK3, RNASE1, SRC |
| hsa04151 | PI3K-Akt signaling pathway | −9.92 | BCL2, EPO, FGFR2, IGF1R, IL4, INS, INSR, ITGB3, JAK3, KIT, PIK3CA, PIK3CG, PIK3R1, PRKCA, MAPK3, RNASE1, RPS6KB1 |
| hsa04664 | Fc epsilon RI signaling pathway | −8.95 | CSF2, IL4, IL13, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PRKCA, MAPK3, RNASE1, TNF |
| hsa04620 | Toll-like receptor signaling pathway | −8.93 | FOS, IL1B, JUN, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, MAPK3, RNASE1, CCL5, TNF, RIPK1 |
| hsa04062 | Chemokine signaling pathway | −8.51 | JAK3, PF4, PIK3CA, PIK3CG, PIK3R1, PRKCA, MAPK3, RNASE1, CCL2, CCL5, SRC, STAT3 |
| hsa04012 | ErbB signaling pathway | −8.32 | ABL1, JUN, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PRKCA, MAPK3, RPS6KB1, SRC, STAT5A |
Parameters of main ingredients.
| Marker | Ingredient | Degree | Betweenness centrality | Closeness centrality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SX10 | 5-Cis-Cyclopentadecen-1-One | 22 | 0.0193688 | 0.43356643 |
| SX26 | 5-Cis-Cyclotetradecen-1-One | 22 | 0.0193688 | 0.43356643 |
| ZCP8 | (−)-isoshyobunone | 22 | 0.0193688 | 0.43356643 |
| MX1 | Artemisia Ketone | 21 | 0.01401109 | 0.42465753 |
| MX30 | Beta-Ionone | 21 | 0.01401109 | 0.42465753 |
| MX5 | (E)-6,10-Dimethyl-9-methylene-5-undecen-2-one | 21 | 0.01401109 | 0.42465753 |
| SX1 | Androstenedione | 21 | 0.01401109 | 0.42465753 |
| ZCP12 | Acolamone | 21 | 0.01401109 | 0.42465753 |
| ZCP20 | Calacone | 21 | 0.01401109 | 0.42465753 |
| ZCP23 | Isoacolamone | 21 | 0.01401109 | 0.42465753 |
| ZCP4 | Shyobunone | 21 | 0.01401109 | 0.42465753 |
| ZCP5 | Acoragermacrone | 21 | 0.01401109 | 0.42465753 |
| ZCP6 | Acoronene | 21 | 0.01401109 | 0.42465753 |
| SX5 | Estradiol | 15 | 0.04337996 | 0.38509317 |
| SX2 | Testosterone | 10 | 0.02274873 | 0.36686391 |
| SX3 | 3,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid | 10 | 0.02185115 | 0.37575758 |
Parameters of main targets.
| Target | Degree | Betweenness centrality | Closeness centrality |
|---|---|---|---|
| PIK3R1 | 29 | 0.05908793 | 0.47509579 |
| PIK3CA | 28 | 0.05208823 | 0.47148289 |
| SRC | 26 | 0.04916463 | 0.43816254 |
| INS | 25 | 0.06397996 | 0.43205575 |
| IL10 | 25 | 0.03851927 | 0.4012945 |
| TGFB1 | 25 | 0.04392304 | 0.42611684 |
| TNF | 24 | 0.03075795 | 0.42906574 |
| FGFR2 | 24 | 0.04953984 | 0.41196013 |
| PF4 | 23 | 0.02872017 | 0.39616613 |
| SIRT1 | 22 | 0.03333712 | 0.38871473 |
| TNFSF11 | 22 | 0.02359378 | 0.39871383 |
| IL4 | 21 | 0.01637895 | 0.39871383 |
| CSF2 | 20 | 0.0155255 | 0.4012945 |
| IL1B | 18 | 0.078045 | 0.4012945 |
| STAT5A | 18 | 0.01173282 | 0.39116719 |
Figure 5Molecule docking results of the main active components and the key TNF-associated targets. (a) The number in the grid represents the binding energy between ligands and macromolecules. The darker the color is, the stronger the affinity is. (b) 4 ingredients (SX10 (5-Cis-Cyclopentadecen-1-One), ZCP8 ((-)-isoshyobunone), ZCP6 (Acoronene), and SX5 (Estradiol)) and NF-κB P65. (c) 7 ingredients (SX26 (5-Cis-Cyclotetradecen-1-One, ZCP8 ((-)-isoshyobunone), MX30 (Beta-Ionone), SX1 (Androstenedione), ZCP12 (Acolamone), ZCP23 (Isoacolamone), and SX5 (Estradiol)) and NLRP3. (d) 9 ingredients (SX10 (5-Cis-Cyclopentadecen-1-One, SX26 (5-Cis-Cyclotetradecen-1-One), ZCP8 ((-)-isoshyobunone), MX30 (Beta-Ionone), SX1 (Androstenedione), ZCP12 (Acolamone), ZCP4 (Shyobunone), ZCP6 (Acoronene), and SX5 (Estradiol)) and IL-1β. (e) 13 ingredients (SX10 (5-Cis-Cyclopentadecen-1-One), ZCP8 ((-)-isoshyobunone), MX1 (Artemisia Ketone), MX30 (Beta-Ionone), MX5 ((E)-6,10-Dimethyl-9-methylene-5-undecen-2-one), SX1 (Androstenedione), ZCP12 (Acolamone), ZCP20 (Calacone), ZCP23 (Isoacolamone), ZCP4 (Shyobunone), ZCP5 (Acoragermacrone), ZCP6 (Acoronene), and SX5 (Estradiol)) and TNF-α. (f) 9 ingredients (SX10 (5-Cis-Cyclopentadecen-1-One), ZCP8 ((-)-isoshyobunone), MX30 (Beta-Ionone), SX1 (Androstenedione), ZCP20 (Calacone), ZCP23 (Isoacolamone), ZCP4 (Shyobunone), ZCP6, and SX5 (Estradiol)) and MAPK P38.
Figure 6Effect of containing serum on cell viability and WSP attenuated the production of inflammatory cytokines in MSU-activated THP-1 macrophages. (a) The viability of MSU-activated THP-1 macrophages was evaluated by CCK-8 assay. Values are mean ± SD (n = 6). ##p < 0.01 vs. CON group; p < 0.01 vs. MOD group. (b–e) Levels of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-18, and IL-6 in the supernatant of MSU-activated THP-1 macrophages measured by ELISA. Values are mean ± SD (n = 4∼5). (f–i) Relative mRNA levels of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-18, and IL-6 of MSU-activated THP-1 macrophages measured by qRT-PCR. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. CON group; ∗p < 0.05, p < 0.01 vs. MOD group.
Figure 7WSP downregulated the protein expression of MAPK/NF-κB signaling pathways in MSU-activated THP-1 macrophages. (a, b) Levels of p-P38, p-ERK, p-JNK, P38, ERK, and JNK in MSU-activated THP-1 macrophages were analyzed by western blot. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). (c) The nuclear translocation activity of NF-κB p65 in MSU-activated THP-1 macrophages was analyzed by immunofluorescence staining. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). (d, e) Levels of p-p65, p-IKKα/β, p65, IKKα, and IKKβ in MSU-activated THP-1 macrophages were analyzed by western blot. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. CON group; ∗p < 0.05, p < 0.01 vs. MOD group.
Figure 8WSP suppressed NLRP3 inflammasome activation in MSU-activated THP-1 macrophages. (a, b) Levels of NLRP3, ASC, and cleaved Caspase-1 in MSU-activated THP-1 macrophages were analyzed by western blot. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). (c) Relative mRNA levels of NLRP3 of MSU-activated THP-1 macrophages measured by qRT-PCR. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. CON group; ∗p < 0.05, p < 0.01 vs. MOD group.