Literature DB >> 36248394

Popliteal aneurysm repair using the posterior approach.

Bradley Bowles1, Mark Awad1, Matthew R Smeds1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneurysm; Popliteal aneurysm; Posterior; Repair; Surgery; Treatment

Year:  2022        PMID: 36248394      PMCID: PMC9556624          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2022.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech        ISSN: 2468-4287


× No keyword cloud information.
Popliteal artery aneurysms are the most common peripheral artery aneurysm, accounting for ≥70% of peripheral aneurysms. It has generally been accepted that the indication for repair includes a symptomatic aneurysm or an asymptomatic aneurysm ≥2 cm in a medically suitable patient. The treatment modalities can be divided into endovascular and open surgical repair with the latter subdivided into posterior and medial approaches, depending on the location and the patient’s anatomic features. Open repair has had superior patency and amputation-free survival compared with endovascular repair but with similar mortality rates and has been well tolerated with reasonable long-term results. When deciding between a posterior and medial approach, an understanding of the patient’s aneurysm characteristics is crucial. Small or fusiform aneurysms, those extending outside the popliteal fossa, and those in patients with poor outflow necessitating distal bypass will often be approached medially. Larger aneurysms with compressive symptoms and those confined to the behind the knee popliteal space will often be treated using the posterior approach. In our video, we demonstrate the treatment of a 72-year-old man with an asymptomatic 3.8-cm popliteal aneurysm using an open posterior approach and prosthetic conduit. In brief, the posterior approach was performed with the patient in the prone position via an S-shaped incision from the medial side of the thigh extending to the lateral calf with the horizontal component over the flexor crease (A). The upper longitudinal incision can be extended over the great saphenous vein, and the inferior incision can be extended medially over the small saphenous vein if these vessels have been targeted as conduits. An interposition bypass using either a prosthetic or saphenous vein graft has demonstrated similar patency rates and major adverse limb events in this position and improved patency compared with a medial bypass in some studies, although the data is somewhat lacking., The patient provided written informed consent for the report of his case details and imaging studies (available on request). In conclusion, the posterior approach to popliteal artery aneurysms is a durable repair option for patients with pathology confined to the popliteal fossa. The procedure is well tolerated and complements endovascular and open medial approaches to this disease in properly selected patients. Intraoperative photograph showing incision with identification of small saphenous vein.
  4 in total

1.  Open versus endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysms.

Authors:  Randy D Moore; Andrew B Hill
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of posterior versus medial approach for popliteal artery aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Alison Phair; Shahin Hajibandeh; Shahab Hajibandeh; Damian Kelleher; Riza Ibrahim; George A Antoniou
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  The incidence of iliac, femoral, and popliteal artery aneurysms in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  P F Lawrence; S Lorenzo-Rivero; J L Lyon
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Comparison of Outcomes for Open Popliteal Artery Aneurysm Repair Using Vein and Prosthetic Conduits.

Authors:  Heepeel Chang; Frank J Veith; Caron B Rockman; Jeffrey J Siracuse; Glenn R Jacobowitz; Neal S Cayne; Virendra I Patel; Karan Garg
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 1.466

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.