| Literature DB >> 36247679 |
Qiren Tan1, Xiaoying Li1, Lumei Wang1,2, Jie Zhao3, Qinyan Yang1, Peng Sun1, Yun Deng1,2, Guoqing Shen1,2.
Abstract
Cadmium (Cd2+) and mercury ions (Hg2+) are essential for the quality control of food samples because of their serious toxicity to human health, but the effective and simple strategy for their parallel detection remains challenging. In this paper, a rapid and simple parallel detection method for Cd2+ and Hg2+ was developed using carbon dots (CDs) as fluorescent sensors. A one-step hydrothermal method with a single precursor l-arginine as both the carbon and nitrogen sources was employed to prepare nitrogen-doped CDs (N-CDs). N-CDs exhibited a uniform particle size and excitation-independent fluorescence emission. The maximum emission wavelength of N-CDs was observed at 354 nm with the excitation wavelength at 295 nm. The quantum yield of N-CDs reached as high as 71.6% in water. By using sodium diphosphate and phytic acid as masking agents, the fluorescent sensor can be quenched by Cd2+ and Hg2+ in the linear range of 0-26.8 μM and 0-49.9 μM within 5 min. Other common ions in farm products showed no significant effect on the fluorescence intensity of the sensing system. The results demonstrated that the sensing system had good selectivity and sensitivity for Cd2+ and Hg2+. The detection limits for Cd2+ and Hg2+ were 0.20 and 0.188 μM, respectively. In addition, the fluorescent sensor had been successfully applied for the detection of Cd2+ and Hg2+ in fruits and vegetables, and the recoveries were 86.44-109.40% and 86.62-115.32%, respectively. The proposed fluorescent sensor provides a rapid, simple, and sensitive detection method for Cd2+ and Hg2+ in food samples and thus a novel quantitative detection method for heavy metal ions in foods.Entities:
Keywords: cadmium ion; carbon dots; food safety; mercury ion; quantitative detection
Year: 2022 PMID: 36247679 PMCID: PMC9563711 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.1005231
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.545
FIGURE 1Fluorescence spectra of resultant CDs under different conditions: (A) different reaction temperatures with reaction time of 4 h; (B) different reaction temperatures with reaction time of 6 h; (C) different reaction temperatures with reaction time of 8 h; (D) different reaction times with reaction temperature of 180°C.
FIGURE 2Characterization of N-CDs: (A) TEM images. Inset: Size distribution diagrams of N-CDs; (B) FT-IR spectra of l-arginine and N-CDs; (C) Full survey XPS spectra of N-CDs; (D) C 1s XPS spectra of N-CDs; (E) N 1s XPS spectra of N-CDs; (F) O 1s XPS spectra of N-CDs.
FIGURE 3(A) Fluorescence emission spectra of N-CDs under different excitation wavelengths ranging from 265 to 315 nm; (B) UV–vis absorption, maximum fluorescence excitation, and maximum emission spectra of N-CDs. Inset: photographs of N-CDs solution under 365 nm UV light (left) and visible light (right); (C) Effect of pH on the fluorescence intensity of the N-CDs; (D) Effect of irradiation time with a 365 nm UV-lamp on the photostability of N-CDs.
FIGURE 4Selectivity of N-CDs toward different metal ions.
Masking agent screening results.
| Masking agents | Hg2+ | Cd2+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1,10-Phenanthroline |
|
|
| Rochelle salt |
|
|
| EDTA |
|
|
| Sodium diphosphate |
|
|
| Phytic acid |
|
|
| Potassium iodide |
|
|
| Sodium sulphate |
|
|
| Acetate buffer |
|
|
| Trisodium citrate dihydrate |
|
|
“+” denotes not masked, “−” denotes fully masked.
FIGURE 5(A) Selectivity of the N-CDs detection to Cd2+ (B) Incubation time of N-CDs with Cd2+; (C) Fluorescence emission spectra of N-CDs under different concentrations of Cd2+.
FIGURE 6(A) Selectivity of N-CDs detection to Hg2+; (B) Incubation time of N-CDs with Hg2+; (C) Fluorescence emission spectra of N-CDs under different concentrations of Hg2+.
FIGURE 7(A) UV–vis absorption spectra of Cd2+ and Hg2+ solutions. Maximum fluorescence excitation and maximum emission spectra of N-CDs; (B) The fluorescence lifetime curves of N-CDs, N-CDs/Cd2+, and N-CDs/Hg2+system.
Comparison of different methods for the detection of Cd2+ and Hg2+ using CDs as sensing probes.
| Precursors of CDs | Ions | QY (%) | Linear range | LOD | Real sample | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chopped scallions | Cd2+ | 18.6 | 0.1–3 μM, 5.0–30.0 μM | 15 nM | Tap water |
|
| Melamine, 2,4-difluorobenzoic acid | Cd2+ | 65.5 | 0–30 μM | 0.34 μM | Tap water |
|
| Citric acid, o-phosphorylethanolamine | Cd2+ | 8.17 | 0.5–12.5 μM | 0.16 μM | Serum and urine |
|
| Auricularia auriculawere | Cd2+, Hg2+ | 23.57 | 0–50 μM | 101.55 nM, 77.21 nM | Dendrobium |
|
| L-Cysteine | Hg2+ | 12.6 | 0.5–20 μM | 500 nM | Lake water |
|
| Sodium citrate, urea | Hg2+ | 67 | 0.001–5 μM | 0.65 μM | Lake water |
|
| Citric acid, urea, thiourea | Hg2+ | 19.2 | 0.1–20 μM | 62 nM | Tap, river, and mineral water, and canned fish |
|
| Citric acid, melamine | Hg2+ | 44 | 2–14 μM | 0.44 μM | Human milk |
|
| L-arginine | Cd2+, Hg2+ | 71.6 | 0–26.8 μM, 0–49.9 μM | 0.201 μM, 0.188 μM | Apples and cabbages | This work |
Analytical results for determination of Cd2+ and Hg2+ in real samples.
| Ions | Sample | Spiked (mg L−1) | Found (mg L−1) | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd2+ | Apple 1 | 0 | — | — | — |
| Apple 2 | 10 | 9.74 | 97.40 | 2.4 | |
| Apple 3 | 50 | 48.32 | 96.64 | 2.6 | |
| Apple 4 | 250 | 241.43 | 96.57 | 3.7 | |
| Cabbage 1 | 0 | 0 | — | — | |
| Cabbage 2 | 10 | 10.94 | 109.40 | 3.0 | |
| Cabbage 3 | 50 | 43.22 | 86.44 | 3.9 | |
| Cabbage 4 | 250 | 248.13 | 99.25 | 4.5 | |
| Hg2+ | Apple 1 | 0 | — | — | — |
| Apple 2 | 50 | 49.22 | 98.44 | 1.8 | |
| Apple 3 | 100 | 115.32 | 115.32 | 3.3 | |
| Apple 4 | 500 | 433.10 | 86.62 | 2.5 | |
| Cabbage 1 | 0 | — | — | — | |
| Cabbage 2 | 50 | 51.14 | 102.28 | 3.3 | |
| Cabbage 3 | 100 | 112.41 | 112.41 | 2.1 | |
| Cabbage 4 | 500 | 513.50 | 102.70 | 4.8 |